Jump to content

Bridge-Four

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    82

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Bridge-Four

  1. Bridge-Four
    True! TPBM should play a game of Sanderson Elimination
  2. Bridge-Four

    Happy Birthday, Dannex!!!

    1. dannnex

      dannnex

      Thank you! Although in my timezone I still technically have a few hours until it’s actually my birthday. :P

  3. Bridge-Four
    Everyone must die someday, except Stick.
  4. Bridge-Four
    R
  5. Bridge-Four
    See? I told you guys Archer was not likely elim in the last post or maybe the second last post. But is seems we have blundered quite badly, we are 4 Hastings vs 3 elims. At the moment, I don't suspect anyone highly. Mild suspicions on Illwei and Gears. But that is about it.
  6. Bridge-Four
    To be completely honest, I am unsure. I really can't make my mind up which one of you I suspect more. I can give you a blurry idea, cuz if I read the game rules right I can't outright tell you everything said in the PM Firstly there was the message he sent me near the end of the last cycle where he suspected he was going to be NK'd, I was asleep then, so I saw it this cycle[Cycle 3] but well, if he was elim why would he ask me to forward the message if he died? [I don't think the elim can NK another elim.] Then the Tani vote came through and tbh I still can't see any solid reason behind it. [M main reson to suspect Archer as elim] But well as Archer PM'd me 'There is so less substance that you have to take the smallest leads to make anything of it' [Paraphrased] But yeah, I am still unsure. A) If I could prove it to you that I have no other PM then I would have. Or there is a way to, then tell me. B ) If I am an elim, why would I really PM another elim? I would have gotten the elim doc anyways right? C) Had I lied on the PM thing, the person I would have PM'd would have immediately told that I was lying. (If you think I would have PM-paired with an elim, please read B ) again)
  7. Bridge-Four
    Hey just so you guys know, I am taking my vote for Archer back because of something they said in the PM. And am voting Mat for he is my lead suspect now.
  8. Bridge-Four
    Well, I am voting Archer this cycle. But I still sus you Mat.
  9. Bridge-Four
    S?
  10. Bridge-Four
    But most importantly, he was not dead like Goofy Panda.
  11. Bridge-Four
    I have been elim reading you from the last turn and some of my suspicions still stay. As for Archer I think I have stated my reasons above. If I am not wrong, you and Archer have a PM too, you might as well be bussing Archer.
  12. Bridge-Four
    My list of who I think is aligned to which side
  13. Bridge-Four
    Yeah, I played it twice as far as I can remember. Once I was village and won. The second time I was elim and was caught in the first round : P
  14. Bridge-Four
    Good Night to you too! I'm also dropping off, will see you guys about 3-5 hours after the rollover happens. And remember, Mraize will like to meet you if you kill Kiel, it won't be pleasant
  15. Bridge-Four
    The main reason for it has been the late vote switch in the last cycle. And a bit of this - Though it seems quite obvious, it could also be the other way around, maybe it was made to make it look obvious, so that we leave Mat from our sus list. (Maybe I am overthinking it.) And a bit of gut read (Even though it was wrong the last time, sorry TUO!) But as I am thinking of it, I sus Mat a bit less now (But I still sus you for now) Anyways I voted for Kings this cycle. Edit- Oops I forgot to reason out Kings voting, it really is from what you(Quinn) and Mat said.
  16. Bridge-Four
    I am yet to make my mind up, but I will vote Matrim or Kings.
  17. Bridge-Four
    ...Neither of us, the GM did But well he chose me, I didn't choose anyone as I did not know anything about anyone so I asked Ashbringer about it in something along the same lines of it. They told me that if I don't choose anyone then I would get a random one and I got interested in that.
  18. Bridge-Four
    (Double posting rn, sorry I guess?) Me and Archer are PM-paired and that was the only PM I had, so I guess it is your turn to speak up.
  19. Bridge-Four
    Okay but I still stand by the opinion that we should ask for their consent. If someone doesn't give their consent or is rather hesitant, then we would have someone to add to the suspect list.
  20. Bridge-Four
    He liked doing it anyway.
  21. Bridge-Four
    I am fine with giving my PM info, but my only objection(Not a big one though) is, why give any extra info to elims that we can save and/or hide? I am fine with sharing the PMs but I think we should ask for consent from our PM-pair, if they don't want to give that info then we should respect that.
  22. Bridge-Four
    I see, thanks again.
  23. Bridge-Four
    Thanks.
  24. Bridge-Four
    What is a bus?
  25. Bridge-Four
    Well, you can. But it would make it very easy for elims to cut off the connections that they want.
×
×
  • Create New...