Jump to content

The Unknown Character

Members
  • Posts

    4260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Unknown Character

  1. Why does that put us in the same activity profile? Only the last part has anything to do with activity, and it's more of a meta thing for me anyway. Edit: You know what, this doesn't feel like V!Kas behavior. I've been consistently null for two cycles then for no particular reason I jump to vote worthy suspect. Mat noticed something c1 and I agree, something is off with you, Kas. @Elandera for the edit vote.
  2. Why do I keep getting lumped into the low activity group? I have been the third highest poster the last two cycles, Wizard had a third of the number of posts I did. At this point if I'm null it's your own fault, and if your only reason for sussing me is my perceived inactivity, then there isn't a reason. Sorry if that's a little heated, but make sure what you say is true before you use it as reasoning to vote someone.
  3. I know this is a double post, but it's been a while since my last one and we need to get the LG up and rolling. @Ashbringer @little wilson and @Elbereth @StrikerEZ Ash again And me. If nobody else wants it I can take it.
  4. As a regular non-voter, my reason for not voting is because I would rather be silent then wrong. Why be wrong now when you could be right later?
  5. I meant playstyle wise, since people don't tend to believe when someone talks about their own meta. I'm not sure. The mechanics are pretty simple, so we didn't have or need discussion about that. Honestly, I'm fine with what was discussed, it wasn't much but I don’t think there could have been much more. Honestly, we just need another player to testify to see if this is normal, if you want a relatively short read for how I act when I'm due to be exed, BT2 might be a good example if you read the Cryptic doc in combination with the thread. Otherwise I'm not sure. I must have miscounted yours, I pegged you at 5. I was mostly just laughing at irony, with me being called relatively inactive by people with less posts then me, even if their content might be a little bit greater. You weren't the first btw, Joe at least has pegged me and I think a few others have as well.
  6. Yah, that's what I said. It knows stormlight terms, and a single mistborn word.
  7. I know what I say has no bearing, but you can look or someone else can confirm, I don’t vote unless I have a solid suspicion, or I have to for exlo. I mentioned earlier to Kas, I would rather have a little bit of accurate suspicion then a lot of barely supported guesses. The most meaningful thing I have is I don't like Kas' c1 posts, but their first post this cycle feels not only vil but like vil Kas, and the rest I haven't gotten any particular read from. Mat was my vil read, but you may have noticed that he's a corpse now. Also, what discussion? The Luckspren vs Ash discussions? The other major discussion was the inactivity/CC debate which I participated in a decent amount. I also discussed the Tie Strat with Kas. That's the Majority of topics we had last cycle I think. Also, I didn’t come out swinging to Joe's post. I corrected an inaccuracy because I hate being misrepresented. Something else to note, I just went back through the thread, and I had more posts than you. I was in the top three posters last cycle. Maybe you should interact more, participate in some of the discussions. That meaningful enough for you?
  8. You must know a thing to destroy it.
  9. Well, you've claimed TL, so if Luck is TL as well, that says some very interesting things about the distro. How does you asking this question track with defending the tie strategy with it's not meant to catch an elim?
  10. It wasn't even on the topic of inactivity anymore, we were talking about CCs at that point, which, I get, is pretty close, but it’s stretching to call that a defense.
  11. What reason would someone have to know you had TL? Everyone had lenses, so it could have just been a shot in the dark.
  12. You claim to be on their side and you disparage our cause, yet you use the very things we purport.
  13. It is very quiet, but I'd probably be around more if there was more to interact with. I expect more discussion d2.
  14. I've also been noticing something off with Kas, but I think I know where they're coming from, so I'm going to leave it be.
  15. I've been around for about a year longer than JNV btw, I just tend to be pretty forgettable because of my activity level. I think we just go about this differently. I'd rather have less more accurate info than more more inaccurate info.
  16. That is deeply flawed. You can get a false positive on relationships easier than an elim. It doesn’t need to be trying to kill an elim for it to be false positive. Also, it should be trying to kill an elim, causing the tie is just hoping to get two elims instead of one. (Elim and the other elim they protect) @Conquestor NAI means Not/Non Alignment Indicative.
  17. Alliterative animals, so first a verb, then an animal that's name starts with the same first letter. Ex: Galluping Gazelles. Actually, I think it blocks kills too, but if your target is killed, you both die.
  18. I talk when I can, I have a pretty busy life, and the time I do have I rarely get on the Shard.
  19. because all of you are jerks Because when people run out of options they do a CC, which almost never actually catches an elim. Hence why it works well when I'm an elim and badly when I'm a villager.
  20. No, I intend to I say that all are equal, but those who mourn the death of tyranny are fools at best, and those same tyrants at worst.
  21. Hey, it works out well when I'm Elim, so why should I talk a lot? Unfortunately, it tends to get me killed in my Village games though. That tends to lead false positives, and it has high chance of false negative as well.
  22. Dear Rhetoric, oh so blinded by the lies of the Questioneers, come to the light, do you not wish to be equal with all others?
×
×
  • Create New...