theTruthshaper

I am pretty sure that Spook was with a LOT of women post Catacendre.

You are both near and far sighted?

Things can always get worse. Why, that's what I am banking on being here on the Shard instead of studying.

LOOK AT MY POWER AND QUAKE!!! BWAH-HA-HA-HA

Don't be scared, it can only get better from now on.

I will straight out admit that I haven't played either of these games. However, isn't Link more like Adolin?

That's what people thought about 2020 too.

Well, let's see: Messiah-like figure - Check Monetary requirements - Check Isolation from friends and family - Check (This is what happens when you have one(1) topic you bring up in every conversation) Attempts to convert others - Check Conclusion: There is no way that the Sanderfans do not form a cult.

I was not talking about now specifically. You will almost certainly eat a waffle again sometime, and will then remember the person who told you the Truth.

There is always another waffle (or pancake)

Pro tip: Eat waffle with nutella

*wins*

*wins while Frustration and Truthless talk*

*Takes away hat and wins*

*wins*

*wins*

*wins*

Green and Red are too similar and cause a lot of confusion(to me at least, but I think that green-red colorblindness is fairly common). I choose red as for because xinoeph was already using it.

I vote 302 (Meta rule: I propose we use green to indicate for and blue to indicate against). Edited to reduce confusion Clever! But your P303 and P304 now run afoul of 111, i.e. they consist of two compounded rule changes. Also, 301 is an amendment of 202. Do we want that to reflect in the Doc?

I edited my post to withdraw(?) my vote. At the time, I had not realized that 302 would have problems. Good point. I think a better way might be to dispense with the turn order completely instead.

There is a problem. P303 must amend 105: This will require atleast 2 rule changes. (3 if we want to make it immutable once again)

Why is the third rule an amendment to 206? They have nothing in common. Also, I think we should first make sure that this game is balanced before making rules relating to the transfer of points. I offer a replacement: 304: If the voting for a particular rule is incomplete, the next player may take their turn, but only after they have voted for all the already proposed rules. EDIT: 111 merely says that one rule change cannot consist of two or more componded rule changes. It says nothing about how many rule changes are allowed in a turn(which is what 301 changes)

What is the ether bunny?

Well, I do sleep a lot. But I doubt that you could gain 1.5 years on me. (Unless you burn cadmium? ) 700

Well, Drama does not have to be always bad. What do we do on these threads if not Drama?