FeruchemicalAbhorsen

Great, thank you! Just one question - what does it mean to "Bisect the minor arc" to make the type II points? Is it just halfway along the arc between the two points? If that is true, I don't think IEB is valid, because it doesn't look like there are halfway points for any pair except IE, and even IE is a bit if a stretch. Thanks again!

I assume you already know Tolkien. If length is really not an issue, Robert Jordan. Garth Nix's Abhorsen is good, KttK is somewhat strange. Phillip Pullman. Seconding Christopher Paolini. Zenna Henderson.

Henry Ford said that. Technically, a sharp has straight vertical lines and slanted horizontals. So, that is a hashtag. I ain't never died while wearing my lucky hat - If you don't know who, SHAME! I always find it sad when I hear people say "I don't read". That's like saying "I don't love" or "I don't learn" or "I don't live". - I can't remember who said that. "That thing is alive!" Nicholas Sayre "Turn and turn and turn again; you see the what but not the when." "Which way do you face if you turn around three times? Backwards." - GtO, don't remember author

Mistborn spoilers: What do you call a candy that makes Inquisitors less angry?

I know it will work with other triangles, but I was trying to figure out which one was used in the drawing.

Right. You said it better than I did.

Pewter is only "not safe" because you no longer feel any pain, and won't notice fatal wounds. Sounds a whole lot safer than holding NB for any length of time.

Keep in mind that if you made aluminum/ralkalest armor, it would block the effect, so maybe it does "pass through". I think that only personal plate blocking it is a good thought, we'll have to see how it turns out as more crossovers happen.

There's a sketch of the Easton, basic and advanced, in the book. However, there's not one of the triangle used to decide the nine bind points. What I was wondering was if anyone has figured out what it is, or whether it really is as impossible as it seems.

My family and I spent several hours trying to reconstruct the triangle for the Easton. As far as we can tell, this triangle doesn't exist. Does anyone know what it is? ( I'd love to be proven wrong). Another possibility could be that that the drawings in the book are not entirely accurate, because a slightly squished equilateral triangle almost works.