Jump to content

Mailliw73

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7523

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mailliw73

  1. Mailliw73
    Wilson, that last paragraph is exactly what I thought happened. I was thinking Rey was Luke's daughter all along, and when R2 woke up as she arrived, I thought that was more foreshadowing, but then they didn't even explain anything.
  2. Mailliw73
    Wow. Yet another bandwagon. I don't have the time now, but I plan to be looking over each cycle's last minute votes and try to see if I can put anything together from that.
  3. Mailliw73
    Wow, I'd really have liked more discussion than this for this cycle. I guess 10+ pages of discussion is too much to hope for every cycle, isn't it? Alv, I'm sorry you think I'm trying too hard, I don't know what else I can say. I'd rather not be lynched for no reason(Creccio) or me trying too hard to be a troll(Alv), so I'm going to vote for Venture to try to make it a bit closer. The other reason for this vote is because the current meta allows for players to sign up for games and then drift by, posting nothing, making it to the end of the game, sometimes winning, sometimes losing, but they survive because they didn't actually do anything. That's not an attitude that should be encouraged here. Polking. I still want to see you post though.
  4. Mailliw73
    Maill the cobbler is in again! Hopefully to finally take out the Spiked!
  5. Mailliw73
    I wasn't sure it was a WGG, because attempting one on a habitually inactive player such as Venture wouldn't be useful. Especially that early in the game. There isn't a point, IMO. I was definitely more suspicious of HS, but then I was voting for him solely based on his attitude, and I'd rather not kill someone with my emotions clouding my judgement. I'd also rather kill someone like Venture, who is almost completely inactive(partly to stop that meta) because it happens often and we don't learn anything from a player who just drops out of the game. So, I'd rather kill him over one of the most active players, because at least we could learn something from HS posting. I want to call out Polking. I believe you still haven't posted since the game began.
  6. Mailliw73
    PK posting second doesn't clear him either though. All he has to do it confirm whatever the Scholar's intermediary says in the thread. If the Scholar says anything, PK will just post the exact same thing if he is or if he isn't a Scholar. PK posting first is probably the best response.
  7. Mailliw73
    ... I don't know what I'm supposed to say to that. Also, I meant to mention this in the last post. I want to apologize to Hellscythe for my behavior yesterday. I let emotions cloud my judgement and said things in a way that they shouldn't have been said. If you have any complaints and want to talk about it, just shoot me a PM. Sorry again.
  8. Mailliw73
    So, my reasons for voting aren't logical, but you "just knowing" is? Can I ask for more explanation? And where my votes didn't add up? I believe that each of my votes has had a logical reason behind it. By the lack of counterclaims and my knowledge of our faction, I'd say this is accurate as well. With the Lux comment, I assume you're referring to Light and are thus claiming Lightweaver. Might I ask why the storms you'd do that? You basically just lost us that role and signed your death warrant. You can't redirect every action headed your way. Um, is there any reason for this vote?
  9. Mailliw73
    Hellscythe, posts like that are why you get votes. Once you decide that someone must be evil, you say everything as if that's a foregone conclusion. But it's not. Not whatsoever. Just because you suspect someone doesn't mean they're always actually evil. I wasn't trying to get you angry so that you'd rack up votes, I was trying to have a debate with you, but you instead wanted a full on mud slinging contest. I don't think you being cocky or rude had anything to do with my posts, frankly, I don't think it has anything to do with your alignment(which is why I've changed my vote), at this point. But your attitude and tone are what are getting you killed right now, so I would advise you to take note of that. (And I did green out my vote of you now. Sorry, I forgot about the original vote.)
  10. Mailliw73
    I'm about halfway through the Lions of Al-Rassan, now that you mention it. I saw Kasimir and someone discussing it and Tigana and decided to read it. I'm really enjoying so far.
  11. Mailliw73
    I'm voting for you based on your attitude, in part. The main reason I am though is because of the things you say just don't add up. Sorry there's not much to it, that's just how it is. And I'll admit, I'd rather go after Ghostbloods who I think are Diagrammists first before I attack my own faction. I'm not sure how you can defend that, and I'm sorry, but sometimes there are just gut feeling lynches. It happens. Sometimes they're right and sometimes they aren't. But, while I still don't like your attitude, I'd rather kill Venture, who hasn't posted again since his roleclaim, than you, since you're actually talking. Hellscythe. Venture.
  12. Mailliw73
    I don't think anyone is voting for you solely because of your role.
  13. Mailliw73
    *Geniuses Enough explorers? What are you talking about? It's just a decent role for them to have. We aren't saying that they need more, just that it's a very likely role for them to have.
  14. Mailliw73
    What everyone means is that an Elsecaller, because of the Transformation surge, is much more likely to be on the Diagrammists team than not. There is little use for a SoH or GB one. The Transportation ability would also grant them another protection role, but a limited one, so not to unbalance the team.
  15. Mailliw73
    If there weren't already plenty of votes on you, PK, and Venture, I would. In fact, I might still vote for Venture. I'm not convinced of either of you, but at least you've defended yourself. Venture hasn't. Of the current lynch candidates, he's the most inactive. Why so? It is very likely.
  16. Mailliw73
    It matters because killing newbies doesn't help them learn how to play the game or encourage new players from signing up. More so than some others, notably Polking, Honey Badger, Ripple, Orlok, Jain, Alv, etc. They've all played games before and haven't given a reason for their absence. Starry, on the other hand, is brand new and has posted.
  17. Mailliw73
    Who are you answering? You quoted Starry, but the Not Really doesn't make any sense in that context.
  18. Mailliw73
    Very true.
  19. Mailliw73
    Coach Kelly?
  20. Mailliw73
    How could you be one step ahead of them? Unless you were the Surgeon/ED that protected Venture, and you've already claimed and been shown to be an Explorer/EC, you didn't do anything to stay ahead of them. You showed what your thought process was, and that's great. But saying that you are more intelligent than the Eliminators comes off as cocky and when people get cocky, people make mistakes. *coughKippertunnelcough* Great stats, but this isn't Town of Salem, so not really relevant, but thanks. ^This. Why Starry? There are those who haven't even posted at all since the game began or those who haven't posted this cycle at all, but Starry has posted already.
  21. Mailliw73
    The fact that they were made into food makes me quite happy.
  22. Mailliw73
    1 for 3. Or 1-2, if that's what you mean. Which isn't a horrible record, but it's also a small sample size. My point was that you should never underestimate the Eliminators. Go read LG9 or LG4 or LG1 or LG5 or any of the other games' evil docs really, if you want to see the ingenuity of evil teams. Go read LG5's. I GMd that one and it had, IMO, one of the best Eliminator teams so far. That was Kas's first game and you can go read how clever he, Alv, and Awes were together in that game.
  23. Mailliw73
    Maybe this opinion is why you haven't won a game in a while..? Never, never assume your enemies are less intelligent as you. This stands for anything. Any kind of game, battle, anything. People who underestimate their opponents tend to lose. If anything, overestimate your enemy. I always assume the Eliminators would do anything I think of. If I can think of it, they can too. Especially since they get to collaborate. No, you aren't. Unless our Cooks are going to focus on the Faction War as much as yours did, and if they do, we will lose. Focussing on the other faction is how the Village loses these games. Go look at LG4. Yes, it was broken, but the Hallandren and the Idrians worked together completely to find the Pahn Kahl. That is how this game should be played. Yes, I want your faction's KR dead, but that's secondary. If the Diagrammists outnumber us, it doesn't matter if the SoH have all their KR and the GBs don't have any, we still lose. That's the point. The best option for a SoH cook to kill was the person they think most likely to be a Diagrammist. The chance of you being a KR was 4/18. That's just under 25%, but the fact that you drew so much attention to yourself makes it less likely that you're a Radiant. If you were, you wouldn't want to draw fire.
  24. Mailliw73
    PK? The math was a bit sketchy, but I tend to skim over any math anyone posts anyways. The thing that makes me suspect him most was his vote on Sart, but his defense of that has assuaged my suspicions a bit. We do need deaths in this game, so that Scholars can check someone. My main suspicions now are Hellscythe and Bort, who'd be at about 75 and 68, respectively, on a scale with 100 being most suspicious and 50 being of middling suspiciousness. Venture and PK are next in line at about 60. I want to hear from Alv, Hael, Burnt, Lopen, Jain, and Orlok. Why so quiet? Edit: I think this is accurate. (2) Bort: Sart, Starry (1) Shallan: Phatt (3) Venture: Kipper, PK, Araris (2) Starry: HS, Bort (1) Mail: Ripple (4) PK: Ada, Clanky, Kynedath, Aonar (1) HS: Maill
  25. Mailliw73
    You're basing your argument entirely off of an I know You Know. If Venture is the obvious choice for protection because he's the least obvious for killing, then the Diagrammists know that and so would choose to kill Stink instead, but since you know that, you should want to protect him instead, but since they know that you know that, they again go to Venture, and on and on. This is a pointless line of reasoning. Was Venture likely to be attacked? Yes, somewhat. Could it be a WGG? Yes, possibly. Do I think it'd be worth it this early in the game and on a player such as Venture? No, I don't. And, by the way, the least obvious choice for death wasn't Venture, it was someone like Kynedath or Shallan or Bort. Those who posted, but only a bit, so that people couldn't learn much from their deaths. That's how I, at least, decide kills when I'm evil.
×
×
  • Create New...