manukos
-
Posts
619 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by manukos
-
No i think i'keep it . come at me odium And @Dalinar Kholin , yes, yes he does
-
First of all @Alvron you are a 100% correct I am a person from sel in love with my land sry but I did this when I noticed that @DroughtBringer was bandwagoning while I was out and my phone died so now at 5 in the morning I return to find that no one else voted him in and I kinda ruined the vote so I am fine taking the blame . Ruin do your best, show me what you can do. odium you may come too but my shard is not that important. Edit : ps you could had guessed that I was an elantrian from my first RP I left 2 hints .
-
Welcome to the shard The best community you will ever find If you ever need anything feel free to message me . Just be warry of the bananas in my inbox Have an upvote and a cookie P.S. the cookie has. Chocolate chips and is freshly baked
-
Bandwagon alert I am voting droughtbringer P.S. yey it only took 10 mins to figure out thanks @Master Elodin
-
@Dalinar Kholin it most certainly is a U turn .During the night i was 100% sure that he and joe were village but after day 2 came he kept latching on to my mistakes like doks and thinking that "someone i trust "-by joe was him. (why are pms considered doks and not this thread, dont think it clearified in the glossary) and from my experience playing boring normal mafia this kinds of players are usualy eliminators since in case they ar proven wrong they can hide behind the excuse of the mistakes . but my actions were kinda weird soooo.... idk perhaps if i was one of you i would be suspicious of myself too. also @AliasSheep can you say again why you are suspicious of magestar?
-
oh that was not evidence it was marely a way to remove any form of suspicion from you because i was certain that you were village . I just don't know why you were so suddenly against me after night two ended . Especialy considering the fact that throughout the night i was defending yours and joe's innocence.
-
@Seonid sry for missing that @Master Elodin knowing this, i get your suspicions.... but the feelings are mutual but i will not vote yet
-
yeah spot on..... not i just wanted verification because if you didnt , you become a suspect since it is possible that you could had not been invested , an idea which i found ludacris but now seems possible from how you opposed me when i asked for proof
-
@Master Elodinwait , what of what i said was weird ? @Kasimir offered a plan of you moving a vote to @Darkness Ascendant as a plan of clearing any suspicion of you beng odium/autonomy and joe your converted i just asked if it happened ?
-
@Seonid sorry to bother you but can we have a tally so far as well as some verification of whether the vote was transferred to @Darkness Ascendant or not.
-
What can you do? I usually like to judge expressions ( rarely successfully) as a criteria for lynching and proving innocence . But that unfortunately that is not possible here
-
Sorry guys @AliasSheep @I_am_a_Stick it apears i missused the word doc I meant the day and night cycle threads like this one P.S. sry i was out and probably will be again soon
-
@Kasimir i nice plan and RP not much to add but, i wanted to mention something about @Darkness Ascendant in the roshar pm he has systematicaly sent a single message at the start of each day and night so far and nothing more .... just pointing that out, and also i wouldn't be against voting him for lynch . has he said anything in any of the mutual docs
-
If he invested then I don't think that he could had used the power as well but he could had changed his vot to save himself apart from that you are correct @Alvron I didn't realize that you could pass the shard prior to a lynch and then assumed that as the invested you inherited the shard elodin ( PvZ cosmere seems like a great idea) anyway I am turning in for the night . Write 5pages for me to read during breakfast
-
Wait , don't you have the shard ? Joe said that he would give it to someone he trusted and MSN said that it was likely you .... but no that wouldn't make sense as for pleas I could had been over dramatic but I was referring to joe saying not to lynch him and I was just saying that we shouldn't have our awakener (I think ) waste a breath since you can just use your power to prove it
-
First of all what was up with that kill? As for lynching I will assist in the process if we are calm and reasonable about it for checking elodin wouldn't it be easier if we just had him invest in one of us or have Him use his ability? P.S. Can we interpret the RP above to understand who killed him
-
Look all i am saying is that i belive that the less of us there are the easier it is for autonomy and the shard Plus i concluded (perhaps wrongly ) that joe is inocent and i thought that sharing what i came up with would benefit us as a whole Also it might be my personal flaw . but i dont like it when people disregard logic . having said that , i am new to this thing and i shouldn't expect to know things and should have kept a ower profile Also @AliasSheep xd xd xd i thought of the same thing but couldnt phrase it correctly .
-
Sure thing gon I already addressed your third point and I think that I did a storming good job explaining my point of view the other two are basically the same what I thought was that if he came back he was most likely to be converted meaning that the rest of us will not be And the shard would had lost one of there conversions and as I said above I'd rather they take a returned that we know and we could lynch next turn rather than a shard edit : ps i am so meating iron eyes before dawn comes
-
@AliasSheepas I said before joe is most likely innocent . Let's look at the facts joe pleaded innocence by claiming that he was cultivation and as proof he presented elodin as his invested, who was unable to reply in time and joe was lynched . This could mean a couple of things: He could be saying the truth (which raises the question , why didn't he use his ability ? The answer for that , could be either that he invested early and couldn't use it since elodin was offline (cause he didn't respond to any of our pleas up until night came) or that he wanted to pass the shard and exonerate himself He could be odium/autonomy and elodin his agent/champion but he would had chosen an active player and the point that I'll make in 3 they are in cahoots and they are cheating.( but for that as well as in No 2 in the lynching process the real cultivation could have changed the votes to reveal joe as a scum , but no one did . In fact you have been pushing for his day one lynching quite a bit which iS kind of suspicious . Even though during day 1 we all agreed that any evidence we had in day1 was flimsy at best
-
The thing is that we loose absolutely nothing by bringing him back yes he is highly likely to be converted but it is a conversion that we can predict . Plus I'd rather that the shard had a returned rather than a mistborn or an elantrian . Not to mention that if he wasn't cultivation the real cultivation or he's invested could change the votes against joe's favor exposing him as a liar and condemning him.
-
Yeah i was quite into yugioh made a lot of decks went to a couple of tournaments,I still play with my brother from time to time I've made like two Pokémon decks that weren't that great even though I've studied the rules of magic I never got into it In The past two years I got really into hearthstone which I would recommend if rou want something that is easy to get into (not as much as last year but still) and it has been a ton of fun playing with some of the guys in my university and coming up with weird deck ideas
-
I do not want to hate on endowment and I understand that some of us have responsibilities but if you have an shard that requires you to be active a lot perhaps it would be wise to pass it on to some one sooner rather than later . p.s. Sry for double post but my edit button does not work for some reason
-
Hmmm let's try again now that I am home and that I can explain better .... so about the first part . It is still the start of the game so we can not expect anything more substantial than that . two players who theoretically did not have means to communicate (considering that they don't cheat and talk to each other outside of the threads and pms ) Agreed that one was granted investment of the specific shard that the other claimed to be and have had invested in him. (Stormfather that was confusing to put to words) I think that trusting that joe is a vessel is a logical assertion. Even though that still doesn't explain why eloping let him die .... maybe offline .... as for why joe let himself die I think that he wanted us to trust in him being a vessel and have him come back ,I think that he had said something of the sort as a viable strategy as for the second ... rusts and ruin I didn't want to say it until day 3 but fine ...... maybe I am overthinking it and it could be wishful thinking but although having a confirmed village is moderately helpful as he can take the lead and be dependable Having a guaranteed member of the 17th shard like joe would most likely be in day 3 gives us a clear lynch as well as stalling the conversion ability of the shard for night 2 , as we stall for more information from our investigators , awakeners etc. tho that plan will not work now ..... as for the last it was mostly a mention to my previous comment about @AliasSheep'S misleading comment that we could wait for night 2 to bring him back which our kindly overlord senoid has said is not possible . Apart from that most of us have not depleted our items yet and vessels are already quite powerful, so I don't see the point in not having him come back so that for example ruin could become a mist born or smt as abundant as that anyway I didn't mean to offend you I just don't see any gain from leaving him to perish for no good reason especially due to ENDOWMENT's possible inactivity
-
I just read it and about that: 1) flimsy evidence is the best kind that we can have 2) having a confirmed village for one cycle is very beneficial 3) and most important ENDOWMENT CAN NOT BRING HIM BACK AFTER TONIGHT ( technically after day 2 but his ability only works during the night
-
ENDOWMENT DO YOUR JOB!!!! Also why did @AliasSheep tried to convince endowment to delay joes return to when it wouldn't be possible (night2) it could be a simple mistake but I am just pointing it out so that it won't go unnoticed in case it means something
