Jump to content

Trelagist

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    44

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Trelagist

  1. Trelagist
    Sorry, I'm on mobile and never noticed that. I WANT MY ROLE
  2. Trelagist
    You don't have a green one, though. How are you going to rescind those votes?
  3. Trelagist
    My name will be The Nameless.
  4. Trelagist
    Soon enough to spam F5?
  5. Trelagist
    Soon?
  6. Trelagist
    I can't believe how easily Joe's manipulating us. I'd dare say not knowing the Holder's identity isn't any worse than Joe being alive and active. (red, can't do right now) Joe (/red)
  7. Trelagist
    Why are we believing Joe, again? How do we know he's not Ryuk and trying to trick us?
  8. Trelagist
    About that active-at-7 thing, I just wanted to check my PMs, but I didn't get to do even that, since my battery died right there.
  9. Trelagist
    My character can't be nameless? He'll go by T, then.
  10. Trelagist
    Signing up.
  11. Trelagist
    I was about to tell everyone how I'd be inactive the next 2 days because of exams, but then I realized: I'm going to be dead in a couple of hours. I still haven't decided between posting a troll RP as my Death Rattle or a spiteful "I told you!" Edit: Yup, I'm bitter
  12. Trelagist
    My bad then. In her PM with me, Wilson said she knew I had gotten Orlok's item and asked me what it was. How would she know the former, but not the latter? Emotion bracelet? Edit: I might be the most aggressive on Wilson, but not about the duel.
  13. Trelagist
    Nyali, if you don't mind me asking, how would DC be certain of my innocence if he's a Noble himself? Edit: And if so, why am I in his suspicion-list?
  14. Trelagist
    As I'm probably dying tonight, I want to announce that I have an Emotion Bracelet and no idea who to use it on as my last action. Any suggestions? And Maill, is destroyed Shardplate given to the Ghostbloods if they do decide to kill DC? (It wouldn't work RPwise) If not, your fear for your life, DC, I assure you, unlike mine, is unfounded.
  15. Trelagist
    Wait - if you think Wilson is probably good, why did you duel her? Edit: removed vote
  16. Trelagist
    I think all that we gained from that exchange was the knowledge that option 'GB theater' is not completely impossible. Which puts attention on me as a GB. Soon after I talk about deathrattles. Huh.
  17. Trelagist
    Wilson
  18. Trelagist
    Which means, unless we are SURE (sound familiar?) that DC is evil, voting for Wilson is best.
  19. Trelagist
    Let's list the possibilities: Wilson evil, DC Noble: Voting Wilson is best since we don't want to lose a Noble, even though it doesn't kill her. DC evil, Wilson Noble: Vote DC, obviously. Both Noble: Voting Wilson is best, as that'll mean no deaths. Both evil: impossible.
  20. Trelagist
    Why would DC protect me? He's probably getting killed because of the duel, and sacrificing himself to protect me (Who you apparently trust(ed?) more than you trust me) makes no sense all.
  21. Trelagist
    Edit: Accidental double post.
  22. Trelagist
    BTW Wil also told me the same thing last night (in which I attacked her) and asked me what I had received.
  23. Trelagist
    I'm fully expecting to die tonight anyway. Curse of the Bottom.
  24. Trelagist
    That last one definitely could happen in a free-PM game, but I'm guessing they didn't get anyone to tell it to. So they just directly told us to kill them instead, hoping that they would be heeded, as is the right course of action for a cleared (by death) player. But we didn't.
  25. Trelagist
    I hit Wilson, because after that death cry that said Kill Wilson, everybody was so willing to dismiss it as strong suspicion, while the one who wrote it (gimme a sec) had clearly showed us of their capability to express mere suspicion in appropriate language in that very same death cry. Edit: Also, nobody has any reason to say Kill X or X is 100% evil in a death cry, unless they have really reliable confirmation (Yafe did say Lopen had a high probability of being evil, while he called the other 3 definitely evil. That means he was sure (not just a high probability, which is all he could hope for with the reasoning he gave us in his death cry, he was actually, definitely, sure) that those 3 were evil. Perhaps he thought elaborating on his definite proof might reveal sensitive information? Honestly, I'm not quite sure.
×
×
  • Create New...