Jump to content

Thermophile

Members
  • Posts

    111
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Thermophile

  1. Atium is actually a "god metal", and apparently composes part of the physical body of Ruin.

    Sazed says that the real difference between atium and other metals is that atium is composed of entirely Ruin, rather than half Preservation and half Ruin. Although it would make sense that the source of power differs slightly, the fact that toxic metals do not harm you after being burned (Kelsiers words) leads me to believe that other metals vacate the stomach as well.

  2. As I said in the original post, I originally thought the metal was turned into an inert state, but in the scene with all the atium towards the end of the third book pretty much makes that impossible.

     

    As for entropy, that would break the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which is probably the second most often broken law of physics in fiction. Although I personally believe that the First Law is being broken in this instance, there isn't any evidence either way.

  3. First Law of Thermodynamics amounts to this: If energy exits an enclosed system, the energy in that system must decrease by that amount. This is the fundamental law that nealry all forms of magic in fiction break, as the magic is not permanentely consumed in the process. Again, this is fine, nobody should hold magic fully to the laws of physics. My point was that as the metal dissapears (as it seems to), the energy (or mass. The two are technically the same) in the enclosed system of the planet would reduce far more than it is increased by the use of allomancy. This is unusual for end-positive magic systems, which leads me to believe that the metal returns to the earth after use, just like atium.

  4. So back to the car. You have this car, it's the system we are using as the frame of reference. Obviously not a closed one, as you're putting gas in it from outside.

    So you put the gas in it, and you've got potential energy to work with now. More than before. You start driving and that's converted to motion. It's still more energy than just an empty car, and it'll never go below the original empty baseline unless you go annihilate the parts into energy (just why?) or scrap some pieces. Eventually you run out of gas, strand yourself on the interstate like an idiot, and are back to . . . however much energy is used to form the matter of the car at all. The fuel escaped as exhaust all the while and disappated.

    You have an allomancer. You start with however much investiture constitutes his spiritweb and the matter forming his cells. That's the system we're defining as a reference. You burn, pouring Preservation (or metabolized atium) into the allomancer, investing him. His powers use that investiture to do their magics, like how the car goes forward. All this time, from the first time the allomancer uses his powers to the day he kicks the bucket, he is more invested than the baseline human. You run out if metal, the flow stops, and you're back to normal with no magic, looking like a fool. The investiture probably escapes into the environment, incorpirated into newborn baby souls, shards, atium, what have you.

    You can't just take the entire cosmere into account, because investiture cannot be created or destroyed as far as we know. Only end neutral will exist, and it's the same for energy in the real world. Science doesn't work like that. The thermometer you stuck in the test tube to track a reaction in a chemistry lab is used to track change of heat of that reaction alone, not the whole universe (which will be 0 anyway). Science is relative, you need to define the frame of reference first.

     

    Unless I misread this, I don't feel like you really addressed the point of this topic. I have heard that metal is more of a 'focus' for the allomancy, rather than the real component. The real component for allomancy is using the investiture you posses to cause an effect (which increases the total energy in the world). You don't lose investiture, otherwise, instead of becoming savants, people would become weaker. The energy generated by allomancy (unless you count compounding, but I think some sort of amplification is going on there) is much less than the energy contained in the matter. The law of conservation of energy would dictate that the energy has to go somewhere, and if the metal does return into the ground, that would allow there to be energy gained rather than lost. Unless less metal goes into the ground than was burned, but I don't want to get into that until I'm ready to make an argument that all magic systems are actually end-negative.

     

    Of course, I could have just completely misunderstood you, so if I did, sorry.

  5. I'm not sure that's what end-positive means. Obviously, aeons create energy, as the shards aren't being consumed through use. With that logic, cars would be end-positive, since you didn't put in the work to create the fuel.

     

    I think end-positive means you're getting energy from nothing in particular. This breaks the Law of Conservation of Mass, but I'm not holding fantasy novels to that.

  6. I don't see that being a problem. Calamity was close enough to be seen by a telescope as a person (although perhaps a very large one). A basic triangulation could easily determine it's distance. This was no doubt done before Epics started appearing. Unless Calamity was using some sort of massive psychic field to repress such an action, in which case that is likely how he avoided being attacked.

  7. I see what you're saying, but I'm not solely referring to nukes. What about railguns? An advanced homing missile attached to a rocket? I can't imagine nobody trying to attack Calamity through some, or all, of these methods.

     

    Again, I can completely imagine him surviving, since he's basically a shard (I'm still kinda annoyed it isn't in the cosmere). I'm just saying we'd have heard about it.

  8. Okay. Allomancy has been declared to be end-positive a lot of times. This means that it does not follow the Law of Conservation of Energy, causing more energy to enter the system then was originally there. This is okay, because this is magic. However E=mc^2 means that each kilogram of mass amounts to roughly 9 x 10^16. A metal flake is nowhere near a kilogram. Let's say a metal flake is a ten thousandth of a kilogram, to be conservative. That still means that a metal flake would need to give more than 10^13 joules. That's ten trillion joules. Yikes. Unfortunately, it is difficult to convert the energy used in allomancy due to the unusual outputs, scientifically speaking. However, there is one metal that transfers metal almost directly from allomantic power into calculable work: iron/steel. Now, the best chance we get (I think) to measure the energy potential of steel is when Vin is doing the horseshoe trick to get to Luthadel. She spent roughly five hours doing it and used 'almost all of her iron and steel'. I'm not going to be calculating iron, since she wasn't spending as much energy pulling in the horseshoes, and was probably wasting a lot of the energy potential. She was keeping herself aloft on average so that makes the energy output somewhat easy to calculate.

     

     

    Let's assume Vin weighs rougly 150 pounds, or 68 kilograms. This means it would take just over 666 watts to keep her afloat (yes, that is what I got). Over the course of 5 hours, this adds up to roughly 12 million, or 1.2 x 10^7 joules. This is six orders of magnitude away from the energy the mass of the metal contained. At this point, it seems like allomancy should be classified as end-negative. What's really going on here?

     

     

    At first, I thought that the metal may just revert into an inert state, or change into a different element. However, considering what happened at towards end of the third book, I find this unlikely. What I propose is that when metal is burned, the metal itself is returned into the earth. After all, it contains a bit of Ruin and Preservation, so the energy must return to its source, aka, the earth. This means that when an allomancer uses metal, that metal appears back in whatever mine it was taken out of.

     

     

     

    What do you guys think?

  9. Yeah, but the government was still fighting against the epics for an unspecified amount of time. People of that day obviously assosiate Calamity with Epics, so somebody must have thought 'if we blew Calamity out of the sky, maybe the Epics would go away?'

     

    Maybe not, and perhaps it was an utter failure, but I find it unlikely that nobody even thought of trying to destroy Calamity.

  10. I would have the power to animate objects to work and fight at my whim (not a High Epic).

     

    My weakness would be of being caught in a lie.

     

    I would be called The Architect, but I'd just wear whatever was comfiest.

     

    I'd have my automotons working my will, and genarally messing with peoples lives without me neccecarily having to even know about it.

  11. I remember only something like "make the Healing harder" and there is a lot of difference.

     

    Also because an Inquisitor (in both of cases) can simply pull out the Allumin-things that hit him and Healing normally. Don't forget that a Pewter Allomancer may resist very long to "fatal" wound

    That's why you'd have the arrowhead/spearhead/other aluminum weapon pard detach when the rest of it is pulled on. If it's messing with your regeneration (even if it wouldn't fully stop it), a full sized arrowhead would kill you fairly quickly, I'd imagine.

     

    With TLR being as OP as he his, I bet he'd just be able to overpower the heal resisting effects of aluminum, so unless you have a LOT of aluminum guns, this is going to just remain a guide on killing Steel Inquisitors. Very sad.

×
×
  • Create New...