Amanuensis
-
Posts
5932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Amanuensis
-
I can empathize with that take a lot, if not in this specific game / context. What're your thoughts on Drake, then? Might as well ask Raven and Neil too.
-
Can I get all your Archer thoughts? Where is he for you reads wise, neglecting other player's opinions of him.
-
Hrm. Depending on said VC I might move again.
-
Also I'll neither confirm or deny if Sart is indeed the elim name I received, and this vote does not mean I don't still think Archer has a better chance of being elim than not, but this slot is worth pressuring after the noticeable drop off between Game A and Game B.
-
Like objectively the elims need to kill me tonight, and it really feels like you are giving them an excuse not to Drake. I will reveal the elim name I received at the very last second of this cycle. If they don't kill me today then tomorrow I out both names and they are in the same position we had been by the end of C1 last game. The only hope they have of not getting both outed is by killing me now, fullstop
-
I do when you're (from my PoV) objectively wrong and none of your reasons make a lick of sense to me Here's the core of my issue. When people say "You are X" with 100% certainty, regardless of whether or not it's true, is not comprehensible to me in the slightest. Especially when one of your "points" was that I overcredenced a few village leans C1 (in the same post I said for now, indicating I will revisit those slots later). The point I'm making here is I'm not certain, and have not once indicated any certainty, on a single players alignment. But you argue that I did and that makes me elim, which is just not factually true. Add on the fact that I am Village, and your insistence I'm not based on faulty reasoning, makes the situation doubly frustrating hence me saying I don't want to engage with you on myself further and let my slot resolve itself. ED1T: For furtherest clarity, this is why I see your approach on me as a tunnel. You've insisted multiple times that it's true, and not allowed yourself any room for being wrong. Any rebuttal I provide has only been met with further rebuttals, and from my PoV it looks like you're twisting things in knots to support your conclusion, and not truly in furtherance of figuring out my slot.
-
We can just agree to disagree at this point I don't think it's productive for me to engage with your tunnel further. Either I'll find out you're the second elim tomorrow or I won't and can work from there Ultimately this discussion is something we can have on C3 or C4. I am the Contact, whether or not you believe it, so if I don't die I'll be able to prove it, and if I do die then there ya go. My slot is solved
-
To explain further, it makes no sense for doc!Aman to claim Contact. It would become obvious if I don't get killed early, so that means there are 3 possibilities: - Lone wolf baiting NK to prove I'm unkillable / elim to my teammates - Vanillager doing PR cover - Contact making it look like I'm doing PR cover
-
Wait a second, now I'm mixing the names up again lol. I meant I like the theory Archer is the lone wolf. I do not think he has doc access I could probably go back and see later tonight the reasons why I felt that way. But no, e!me usually avoids giving v!reads early game, let alone reads at all (hence last game) Ultimately I think I have lone wolf potential but no, I am not in the doc regardless of my alignment
-
One more thing. I retrieved a name from the Insider but I'm not voting them for now. Would rather see how they behave the rest of the cycle. Will probably drop the name before today ends in case they kill me
-
"Good for now" literally meant for that cycle lol, aka people I wouldn't vote C1 Anyway back to catching up Did I? Archer. It was a thought I had but not one that I would bet money on. Was mostly hoping for someone to weigh in at the moment. I like the Insider!Archer theory tbh
-
4 on archer 4 on aeo (including herself) 2 on JNV 1 on Stick
-
It's a Croatian swear that I used once and Kas liked basically "eff it" but in a flippant, who cares, YOLO way
-
Does e!Archer not make it for EoD is my question rn
-
Jebiga! Archer
-
Is it Ninja'd
-
I'd be down to switch my vote / the exe to either Bee or Archer tbh i lub flashwagons Amanuensis
-
r00d
-
JNV I guess @JNV how goes things friend
-
Hi Aeo. I'm doing okay. Stomach is a bit grumbly but I'm not really hungry. HBU?
-
Oo which one
-
-
Wilco! I find it interesting Raven went from saying he needed more info to vote, I engaged with him with some jokes, and then he ended up voting Neil. I don't know what to make it that yet, but it's notable Archer is probably elim according to my gut but I've got no foundation for a vote beyond that No unique thoughts on Royal, would probably defer to other reads from peeps I trust.
-
Feels better than it sounds, I can tell you that! Anyway back to game content, I'm fine with Kas, Stick, Neil, and Drake for now. Where @Sart at
-
Too late I'm wearing a snuggy and uggs and everything
