Marmota

Q: You mentioned that human can’t bond Honorblades, but Nalan tells Szeth that his bond with his Honorblade has been broken. Can you clear this up? A: Humans CAN bond Honorblades. There's a crucial difference between Honorblades and Shardblades. When you drop an Honorblade, it does not disappear, even if it has been bonded. A Shardblade will disappear when dropped. Wait a sec...If Honorblades dont dissapear, what about Szeth then? He had an honorblade, and could dimiss it

Thanks for the welcoming hehe =) 1 - Ok, agreed. Its bugging me less now 2 - Understood but still didnt like it much 4 - I was thinking that just mentioning an Ideal could open the Oathgate, didnt have to be a new Ideal each time....but it was only an idea to demonstrate that he could have inserted this part in a better position. I mean, still think that after thousand pages of mistery regarding shallan past, the revelation ended up being kind useless....

It sure could be a Herald as well.... though between these two options i would rather take Adolin, because i would like the plot twist. Though, i was seeing the heading again and saw that there was a mistake in the Heading that I quoted. Its not from the " 2nd Ceiling Rotation". It is in fact "2nd Desk Drawer". Looking into other Headings of the book of the 2nd Desk Drawer ( chapters, 81 and 82) both speak of the Unmade. That may lead to belieave that the chapter 86 (One is almost certainly a traitor to the others) might refer to a Unmade as well. Not Adolin(or other KR) neither Heralds. Now its a deviation of the original discussion i know. But it might be implying that an Unmade is actually gona help the Radiants during the new Desolation, and not the other way around. Shame....new vilains are better than new heroes....

BS has already stated that there is some KR orders that would be very happy with what Adolin did to Sadeas (dustbringers for an example). I would be very surprised if Adolin doesnt turn out to be a Radiant as well at the end of the next book. But, i was wondering about this heading in chapter 86 in WoR: One is almost certainly a traitor to the others. —From the Diagram, Book of the 2nd Ceiling Rotation: paragraph 27 I think that it may refer to the KR orders, and one order will have a trator. How cool would it be if the traitor turn out to be Adolin ? I think that the fact that Adolin doesnt have any scheduled flashback book may support this theory i litle bit.

Hey Guys! It was only a couple days ago that i finished WoR, and although I pretty much liked the book, there was some points that are bugging me. Maybe i am missing something here, or just seeing with the wrong eyes. So i would like to share these points with you, maybe you could explain it further and change my opinion....Here we go 1 - In the bridge sabotage part, Kaladin hear the sounds of horns announcing Parshendi an attack before he falls. Later, Dalinar returns to the warcamp and no one ever talks about an attack. Even if its not important, i just feel wrong that no one talked about it. So what happened? 2 - I really thought that it was not well explained when Shallan discovers that Pattern was her shardblade. How come she dint realize it earlier? BS pushed that one IMO.... 3 - Szeth ressurection. Ok we all knew that hes was not really gona die, obviously. But then BS shouldnt make Kaladin cut Szeth's neck with a sharblade! Nale's explanation of how he saved Szeth was really lame (Nale: Your soul was ripped out, but your brain wasnt dead yet....really??). I perceive that Kaladin and the others believing that Szeth is dead will be important in the future, but still i think BS pushed too hard again in that part. 4 - Right in the end, when Shallan remembers what really happened with her mother. BS put this scene after all resolutions in the book, so after all thisrevelation didnt matter for the plot. Wouldnt it be MUCH better if to activate the Oathgate a KR has too pronounce one of his order's Ideal? As truths = Ideal for Lightweavers, she could remember in that time in the revelation would be much more meaninful. So, do you agree ith me? Once again i say that i reaaally liked the book, so these are some minor point, but are some details that are annoying me. Maybe i didnt get it right and someone could explain to me! edit: grammar error