Jump to content

Wonder if this line is still relevant to the philosophy of these things


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

(Trying to keep title vague)

Ran across this line from the Former's speech again:

Quote

Promises. Promises for me are not what they are for men. I am made of promises--promises to exist, promises to think, promises to be. I said I would not intervene in my sons’ contest. A promise made before their hatred of one another manifest, when they loved. I am bound. I cannot intervene any more than you can make the sun vanish, emperor of men.

I wonder if this is still relevant to the current Cosmere and Shards. Not in a literal manner, necessarily. But in how Brandon envisions these types of being viewing themselves.

(This would very much be a kind of philosophical view, not the Shards like, literally being promises manifest, but I can see that kind of idea arising with the whole "Dawnshards are Commands" thing. If Dawnshards are Commanding things, could the Investiture out there following these Commands be viewed kind of as promising to carry it out? That sort of deal.)

Nothing terribly important or major, just an idle wonder.

Edited by LewsTherinTelescope
Posted

Nice thought. I suspect that the idea did make it into the canonical Cosmere in at least some form since we know from the Stormfather, Odium and WoBs that Shards are absolutely bound by capital-o Oaths that they make. Breaking things that don't qualify as proper oaths is okay though.

To go to your idea about Investiture 'promising' to carry out a Command, that's kind of how Awakening works. We're told that if you break apart an Awakened object, the pieces of it can still try to carry out the Command if they're able to do so.

Posted
On 8/18/2021 at 10:42 PM, Weltall said:

Nice thought. I suspect that the idea did make it into the canonical Cosmere in at least some form since we know from the Stormfather, Odium and WoBs that Shards are absolutely bound by capital-o Oaths that they make. Breaking things that don't qualify as proper oaths is okay though.

To go to your idea about Investiture 'promising' to carry out a Command, that's kind of how Awakening works. We're told that if you break apart an Awakened object, the pieces of it can still try to carry out the Command if they're able to do so.

Oh cool, yeah that does match that idea.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...