Terminology category

[Alicila]

There's a thing that bothers me is that the content pages "Savant" and "Babsk" belongs to the category "terminology". This is odd because "Terminology" is a subcategory of disambiguation pages and should only include redirects. But since a lot of content pages can belong to terminology, too, it would be nice to find a separate place for these non-disambiguating terminology pages. My suggestion is to change the current "terminology" into "teminology redirects" and put the content pages in a separate category "terminology".

This is Joe ST on that. 

However, I realized that there might be too many pages that can fit into the category Terminology, like Allomancy, Investiture, Lifeless, etc.

Perhaps the efforts to put all these pages into a category will not be so useful? Please leave some thoughts on this.

Edited April 23, 2019 by Alicila

[Chaos he/him]

Hi Alicila,

We are discussing the Terminology category. We definitely see this has not been consistently applied and we are trying to figure out a course of action. A lot of the redirect categorization has not been well thought out. So we are trying to think about that. 

[Jofwu he/him]

As best I can tell, this Category was meant as a way to capture certain types of redirect pages. I think I've convinced @Joe ST that they aren't necessary on full articles that already have distinct categories? So I've gone ahead and removed the tag from those pages.