Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
11 hours ago, animalia said:

"almost"? Guess we can rule out Kelseir then. :D

Not Kelsier. But they might have killed other nobles, it's just that there's one they almost killed too.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
Posted
5 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Not Kelsier. But they might have killed other nobles, it's just that there's one they almost killed too.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.

Jon Acron?

Posted
1 hour ago, Szeth's Facepalm said:

I don't suppose it's zane...

 

42 minutes ago, Hazekiller16 said:

Jasnah?

 

6 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Jon Acron?

 

5 minutes ago, Thaidakar the Ghostblood said:

Shalash?

Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
Posted
32 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

 

 

Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.

Ien? Not very wise when affected by the Shaod, and almost had a big part in taking out Dilaf that got cut.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, animalia said:

Shallan?

Edit: or Bavadin?

 

1 hour ago, AceBassMan said:

Ien? Not very wise when affected by the Shaod, and almost had a big part in taking out Dilaf that got cut.

Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.
Edited by ElMonoEstupendo
Posted
1 hour ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.

Moash?

Posted
1 hour ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.

doesn't quite match clue four but Eshonai? 

Posted
2 hours ago, AceBassMan said:

Moash?

 

2 hours ago, Shinwarrior said:

doesn't quite match clue four but Eshonai? 

Not Moash.
Not Eshonai.
Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.

Bonus Clue: This character was a child during the Recreance.

Posted
2 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Moash.
Not Eshonai.
Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.

Bonus Clue: This character was a child during the Recreance.

Syl?

Posted
8 hours ago, Thaidakar the Ghostblood said:

Stormfather?

 

7 hours ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Syl?

Not Stormfather.
Not Syl.
Not Moash.
Not Eshonai.
Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.

Bonus Clue: This character was a child during the Recreance.
Bonus Bonus Clue: This character is susceptible to blotting.

Posted
12 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Stormfather.
Not Syl.
Not Moash.
Not Eshonai.
Not Shallan.
Not Bavadin.
Not Ien.
Not Zane.
Not Jasnah.
Not Jon Acron.
Not Shalash.
Not Kelsier.
Not Ashe.
Not Vin.
Not Sazed.

  1. This character associates with royalty.
  2. This character almost killed a noble.
  3. We've seen two very different aspects of this character.
  4. This character's name is at odds with one of their aspects.
  5. This character defied their people to revive an old tradition.

Bonus Clue: This character was a child during the Recreance.
Bonus Bonus Clue: This character is susceptible to blotting.

Ivory?

Posted
4 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Ivory!

Now that I think about it, is ivory even a thing on Roshar? What has tusks...

It’s likely a holdover word from before they came to Roshar, given ivory is only found in mammals. The colour name would have remained even after the source of the word was lost.

1: This character is a parent

Posted
2 hours ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

It’s likely a holdover word from before they came to Roshar, given ivory is only found in mammals. The colour name would have remained even after the source of the word was lost.

1: This character is a parent

The StormDaddy

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, animalia said:

Kiin.

Nope!

This character is a parent.

This character has more than two children.

This character has a married child.
Edited by Kingsdaughter613

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...