Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.

Wax

Posted
1 hour ago, Marukka said:

Wax

 

19 minutes ago, Elf said:

Lightsong?

Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.
Posted
38 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.

Vwafendal?

Posted
10 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Vwafendal?

 

9 minutes ago, CryoZenith said:

Nale

Not Vwafendal.
Not Nale.
Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.
  4. This character funds espionage.
Posted
1 minute ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Vwafendal.
Not Nale.
Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.
  4. This character funds espionage.

Raoden?

Posted
23 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Vwafendal.
Not Nale.
Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.
  4. This character funds espionage.

Kelseir????

Posted
42 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Raoden?

 

21 minutes ago, animalia said:

Kelseir????

Not Raoden.
Not Kelsier.
Not Vwafendal.
Not Nale.
Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.
  4. This character funds espionage.
  5. This character has a colourful family tree.
Posted
50 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Vwafendal.
Not Nale.
Not Wax.
Not Lightsong.
Not Mraize.
Not Dalinar.

  1. This character keeps their deals.
  2. This character is related to a villain.
  3. This character clearly has a favourite.
  4. This character funds espionage.

Dedelin

Posted
9 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Moash?

Nope

4 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Ahan (I think it was him? The one who betrayed Sarene.) or Eventeo 

Nope

Not Moash
Not Ahan
Not Eventeo

1. This character changed sides.
2. This character sure got around a lot.

Posted
5 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Khriss, and you're being clever with #1.

Nope. I am not that clever. :wacko:

Not Moash
Not Ahan
Not Eventeo
Not Khriss

1. This character changed sides.
2. This character sure got around a lot.
3. This character was deemed very trustworthy.

Posted
2 hours ago, Marukka said:

Nope. I am not that clever. :wacko:

Not Moash
Not Ahan
Not Eventeo
Not Khriss

1. This character changed sides.
2. This character sure got around a lot.
3. This character was deemed very trustworthy.

Elorin 

Posted
34 minutes ago, CryoZenith said:

I am going to assume #2 is metaphorical and guess Szeth.

Nope

14 minutes ago, Kingsdaughter613 said:

Elorin 

Nope

Not Moash
Not Ahan
Not Eventeo
Not Khriss
Not Szeth
Not Elorin

1. This character changed sides.
2. This character sure got around a lot.
3. This character was deemed very trustworthy.
4. This character was given an absolutely vital task that he/she failed.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Nope

Nope

Not Moash
Not Ahan
Not Eventeo
Not Khriss
Not Szeth
Not Elorin

1. This character changed sides.
2. This character sure got around a lot.
3. This character was deemed very trustworthy.
4. This character was given an absolutely vital task that he/she failed.

Rashek?

Posted
47 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

Rashek?

Nope

Not Moash
Not Ahan
Not Eventeo
Not Khriss
Not Szeth
Not Elorin
Not Rashek

1. This character changed sides.
2. This character sure got around a lot.
3. This character was deemed very trustworthy.
4. This character was given an absolutely vital task that he/she failed.
5. This character was killed while trying to accomplish this task.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...