KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:34 AM Posted Sunday at 03:34 AM (edited) I realised that there was no thread dedicated to this, so I decided to make one! Tau Day is coming up, after all. For those of you who don't know, Tau is equal to 2π, and is an alternative circle constant. τ is good because if you use π, a full circle is 2π radians, but with τ, it's just one τ radians, which makes trig waaaaay easier. So yes, I believe τ is objectively better than π, but I am also too used to π to swap now  And also most calculators lack tau, and there's no song to help me memorise it, so... Anyways, what do y'all think of tau? Edited Sunday at 04:04 AM by KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren SPaG
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:48 AM Posted Sunday at 03:48 AM (edited) At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using. Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0. Edited Sunday at 03:48 AM by Through the Living Hopper
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:53 AM Author Posted Sunday at 03:53 AM 3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using. Probably, but there's still a chance 3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0. Oh yes, something I forgot to mention... With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero But with tau... e^(τi) = 1 So yeah, another reason tau is better
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:56 AM Posted Sunday at 03:56 AM 1 minute ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero But with tau... e^(τi) = 1 So yeah, another reason tau is better Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula.
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 03:59 AM Author Posted Sunday at 03:59 AM 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula. Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one The one is just there to make it a nicer number
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted Sunday at 04:00 AM Posted Sunday at 04:00 AM Just now, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one The one is just there to make it a nicer number Also to add another identity. And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0).
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Sunday at 04:03 AM Author Posted Sunday at 04:03 AM 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: 3 minutes ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said:  Also to add another identity.  Why are you adding the multiplicative identity ? 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:  And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0). One works just as well The extra +1 makes it not as good for π's
Usseewa ✾ She♡They ✾ Posted Sunday at 06:43 PM Posted Sunday at 06:43 PM the symbol for tau looks like half a pi (the right part of pi), so it's funny that's it's 2pi..
Chaos he/him Posted Sunday at 11:44 PM Posted Sunday at 11:44 PM Tau is so much better. It'd make learning the unit circle far easier. Half the circle would be tau/2. Way better! In basically every physics formula, it's always 2pi. That really should indicate that 2pi is the correct one. I mean, when the hell do we even is C = pi * d? Use the radius! The radius is the important one. You might say, "But Eric what about A = pi*r^2?" To which I'd say, A = 1/2 tau*r^2 is very symmetric with the kinetic energy formula. That 1/2 should be there anyway, due to integration. In fact, I thought that one argument against tau was that the standard normal distribution had a single sqrt(pi) rather than sqrt(2pi), but nope! It does have a 2pi. I guess the integral from -infinity to infinity of e^(-x^2) has the sqrt(pi)... So anyway, I'm a math professor who loves tau. I'm not at all a fan of pi day, and I won't stand for this pi propaganda merely because "well then we can have pie on pi day". Lame. I spend pi day in my math tutoring center explaining why tau is superior. 6
Shatter He/Him Posted Monday at 06:07 PM Posted Monday at 06:07 PM I like τ and π. I'm not an ultra mathy guy, so I just decide which one to use and stick with it.
Keteᛕ He/Him/His Posted Monday at 09:54 PM Posted Monday at 09:54 PM The formula for the area of a circle is A = pi r^2, compared to A = (tau r^2)/2... pi is also much older 1
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted Monday at 10:03 PM Author Posted Monday at 10:03 PM 7 minutes ago, Keteᛕ said: The formula for the area of a circle is A = pi r^2, compared to A = (tau r^2)/2... That is one equation, when tau makes basically everything else easier. Do you do trig? Also, as Chaos said, it aligns well with the kinetic energy formula. 8 minutes ago, Keteᛕ said: pi is also much older That is not a good reason... geocentrism is way older than anything else... 1
Usseewa ✾ She♡They ✾ Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 13 hours ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: That is not a good reason... geocentrism is way older than anything else... aggree  makes me question everything we think we know, and believe Â
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted 5 hours ago Author Posted 5 hours ago 9 hours ago, Usseewa said:  makes me question everything we think we know, and believe  Aaaand that is how science happens Â
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now