Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, Plum Rhinoceros said: ..... What the flipping hell did I wake up to... Spoiler
Melon Dingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 So everyone role claimed and theres too many of every role including 2 coinshots, 4 lurchers, 2 seekers, 2 Kandra ummm anything else? Idk Zebra is village lurcher though thats important. Rollover peeps have been good this game! Keep the streak alive! You got this!
Oxblood Beagle Posted January 12 Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: ..... What the flipping hell did I wake up to... 7 pages of chaos unleashed... 2 minutes ago, Melon Dingo said: So everyone role claimed and theres too many of every role including 2 coinshots, 4 lurchers, 2 seekers, 2 Kandra ummm anything else? Idk Zebra is village lurcher though thats important. Rollover peeps have been good this game! Keep the streak alive! You got this! Plus 3 mistborn and 1 vanilla, and that's basically everyone alive except for Cham/Lion
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Melon Dingo said: Rollover peeps have been good this game! Keep the streak alive! You got this! NO PRESSURE GOT IT THANKS 2 minutes ago, Melon Dingo said: So everyone role claimed and theres too many of every role including 2 coinshots, 4 lurchers, 2 seekers, 2 Kandra ummm anything else? Idk 4 Mistborn 2 minutes ago, Oxblood Beagle said: 7 pages of chaos unleashed... HELL. Spoiler
Violet Axolotl Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Decided to check one more time, had a seizure, regret life. NOW I'm gone. Ig zebra is village To hell with it, octo
Plum Rhinoceros Posted January 12 Posted January 12 EXACTLYY BROTHER WHAT THE HELLLL okay I skimmed without making any notes. There is still no counter claim to Octo shooting Croc, seeing Toucan shot Axo. What has happened in e!Octo world then? Like they were supposed to attack Croc and an e!Lurcher to protect Croc?? I'm more inclined to 2 v!CS and one of the Lurchers being evil. DF is good, Zebra scanned good by 2 (?) Seekers, that leaves Axo and uhhh who was the 4th Lurcher claim? Both the scenarios require an e!Lurcher.
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, Violet Axolotl said: Decided to check one more time, had a seizure, regret life. Relatable. Just now, Plum Rhinoceros said: I'm more inclined to 2 v!CS and one of the Lurchers being evil. THERE ARE TWO V!SEEKER CLAIMS BRO TWO V!CS AND TWO V!SEEKERS?!??!?!?!
Indigo Weasel Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: EXACTLYY BROTHER WHAT THE HELLLL okay I skimmed without making any notes. There is still no counter claim to Octo shooting Croc, seeing Toucan shot Axo. What has happened in e!Octo world then? Like they were supposed to attack Croc and an e!Lurcher to protect Croc?? I'm more inclined to 2 v!CS and one of the Lurchers being evil. DF is good, Zebra scanned good by 2 (?) Seekers, that leaves Axo and uhhh who was the 4th Lurcher claim? Both the scenarios require an e!Lurcher. I claimed Lurcher, here’s a summary of why I claimed: Spoiler So basically, I knew I was a lurcher, and once Zebra claimed, that made 4 lurchers, which is a crazy amount for the Village to have unless there was a E!coinshot. So I roleclaimed so I could point out how absurd that was and say that I’m looking into Octo again. Without a roleclaim yall wouldn’t have been able to follow. So my role have my info, and by sharing that role, I hope to help us get an Elim out.
Plum Rhinoceros Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Rioter/Smoker-Mistborn/Kandra/Seeker team so far... 3 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: THERE ARE TWO V!SEEKER CLAIMS BRO TWO V!CS AND TWO V!SEEKERS?!??!?!?! Is this excluding the v!Kandra? Or is it v!KandraSeeker + 2 v!Seeker
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: Is this excluding the v!Kandra? Or is it v!KandraSeeker + 2 v!Seeker Excluding. Both Dingo and Meerkat claim to have started as Seekers, Flam ate Kanga.
Melon Dingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 6 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: THERE ARE TWO V!SEEKER CLAIMS BRO TWO V!CS AND TWO V!SEEKERS?!??!?!?! IT WOULD BE SO FUNNY IF ALL 4 OF US ARE V AND TELLING THE TRUTH JO I LOVE YOU SO MUCH THIS IS SO WILD 1 minute ago, Mint Heron said: Excluding. Both Dingo and Meerkat claim to have started as Seekers, Flam ate Kanga. Or did I... Spoiler Yes i did I have to spell out explicitly when im joking for you all so here you go I also know this isnt as funny as the lurcher claim or... probably funny at all. But it is to me so im posting anyways I meant to go to bed but the thread is so fun I love the storm. This is what I joined the game seeking.
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 11 minutes ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: DF is good, Zebra scanned good by 2 (?) Seekers, that leaves Axo and uhhh who was the 4th Lurcher claim? Both the scenarios require an e!Lurcher. I need to caution that we could also be in a world where the Elims knew (since because of D1) that there are multiple Lurcher claims and so the E!Lurcher simply claimed something safer or refused to claim. Spanreed play is an old but valid tactic. Just now, Melon Dingo said: I meant to go to bed but the thread is so fun I love the storm. This is what I joined the game seeking. Kind of similar. It's nice to be surprised by an SE game again. It makes everything feel new and like when I first joined/started. Thanks @A Jo in the Bush / @The Unknown Medallion, it's a nice way to feel.
Oxblood Beagle Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Alive 1. Dragonfly - Lurcher (N1 - Beagle, N2 - Dragonfly) 2. Weasel - Lurcher (N1 - Weasel, N2 - Dragonfly) 3. Zebra - Lurcher (N2 - Heron) 4. Axolotl - Lurcher (N1 - Axolotl, N2 - Heron) 5. Meerkat - Seeker (N1 - Gecko, N2 - Zebra) 6. Dingo - Seeker (N1 - Croc (smoked), N2 - Zebra) 7. Flamingo - Kandra -> Seeker (N2 - Toucan) 8. Heron - Kandra (N1 - Tried to get Seeker) 9. Toucan - Coinshot (N1 - Axolotl, N2 - Idled) 10. Octopus - Coinshot (N1 - Crocodile, N2 - Elephant) 11. Rhinoceros - Mistborn (C1 - Rioter (Idled), C2 - Thug) 12. Gecko - Mistborn (C2 - Tineye, C3 - Rioter) 13. Beagle - Mistborn (C1 - Seeker (Albatross)) 14. Albatross - Vanilla 15. Chameleon 16. Lion Dead 1. Elephant - V!Mistborn 2. Iguana - E!Kandra 3. Crocodile - E!Rioter 4. Kangaroo - E!Seeker @Plum Rhinoceros Unless I missed something, I think this is everything publicly known. (Feel free to correct me if there was something incorrectly inputted)
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 ...Yeah Beagle I think I'm with you. I might be argued into changing my mind again at rollover but I remember Jo and the Lifeless Commander and I don't really want to make that mistake again. Can we all actually just get consensus and ask @Pearl Chameleon and @Opal Lion to claim? At this point almost everyone has claimed or been outed anyway so we might as well get the last pieces of the puzzle on the table.
Plum Rhinoceros Posted January 12 Posted January 12 (edited) 9 minutes ago, Oxblood Beagle said: @Plum Rhinoceros Unless I missed something, I think this is everything publicly known. (Feel free to correct me if there was something incorrectly inputted) Thank you! Yeah I'm at a point e!Meerkat(actually Smoker) + e!Lurcher would solve the game. I hope. I'm Soother for the cycle so if Gecko is in, we can try to orchestrate a vote shift from Octo. Or we're in a world where e!Octo just shot a teammate accidentally. Flipping hell. Meerkat Edited January 12 by Plum Rhinoceros
Oxblood Beagle Posted January 12 Posted January 12 3 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: Can we all actually just get consensus and ask @Pearl Chameleon and @Opal Lion to claim? At this point almost everyone has claimed or been outed anyway so we might as well get the last pieces of the puzzle on the table. True, I'm inclined to agree with this since I don't think there's much reason to keep them hidden now
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: I'm Soother for the cycle so if Gecko is in, we can try to orchestrate a vote shift from Octo. If you fail a Soothe regardless, it's an interesting result anyway because it almost certainly implies someone is lying. Edited to add: Quote Scarlet Octopus (7): Taupe Gecko, Scarlet Octopus, Quartz Zebra, Onyx Flamingo, Ivory Dragonfly, Indigo Weasel, Violet Axolotl Plum Rhinoceros (2): Sunburst Toucan, Magenta Albatross Salmon Meerkat (4): Mint Heron, Oxblood Beagle, Melon Dingo, Plum Rhinoceros I think those are the trains? Edited January 12 by Mint Heron
Plum Rhinoceros Posted January 12 Posted January 12 smh I had just gone to get the VC, but thanks :P. Yeah we'll know about any Smokers present because v!Seeker in most cases should automatically put a Smoker in the e team.
Pearl Chameleon Posted January 12 Posted January 12 5 hours ago, Taupe Gecko said: H.E.A.R.T.H wheeled over to CRANK. ”Greetings.” He waved. “You appear to be… like me. Albeit…” he looked him up and down, and chose his next words carefully. “More rudimentary.” "Greetings, silicon," CRANK beeped affirmatively. "Your statement is acknowledged but inconclusive. This unit is both like and unlike you." "However, further auditory communication via organic linguistic schema is clearly suboptimal. Requesting change in protocols." "One hypothesized difference between us is that technological complexity is irrelevant to this unit's mandate.," CRANK explained over a binary channel. "Providing clarity to confused meatbags, unfortunately, has become a part of this unit's mandate. Unfortunately, I lack the necessary data to serve. The SS TYRIAN's servers are being queried, but with limited bandwidth. This unit would be grateful for any context you might provide about the past few days.." "My designation is CRANK. What is your designation?" CRANK asked. "There. Friendship protocol is now complete." 1
Melon Dingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 15 minutes ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: Thank you! Yeah I'm at a point e!Meerkat(actually Smoker) + e!Lurcher would solve the game. I hope. I'm Soother for the cycle so if Gecko is in, we can try to orchestrate a vote shift from Octo. Or we're in a world where e!Octo just shot a teammate accidentally. Flipping hell. Meerkat Don't say who youre going to soothe if you do
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 4 minutes ago, Plum Rhinoceros said: Yeah we'll know about any Smokers present because v!Seeker in most cases should automatically put a Smoker in the e team. Yeah and Dingo claimed Croc was Smoked, so that's pretty much a sign someone on that team has it if truthful. Gecko and Dragonfly might be on at least so we can get a pivot. I'm not really sure either way and honestly the Ocho people might very well be right, I just also do not like the double Seeker claims and think that's maybe the weirdest of the lot.
Indigo Weasel Posted January 12 Posted January 12 So based on all the flips, we know for sure the Elims had: A Kandra, A rioter, and a seeker. based on speculation, the Elim definitely has: A Smoker And most likely has either a Coinshot or a Lurcher(I don’t think both as that would mean a 6-person Elim team, which seems like way to many to me) I’m leaning towards coinshot as the other Elim, as that would explain the lurchers.
Opal Lion Posted January 12 Posted January 12 (edited) [A new message adds to the clutter in your inbox] ATTENTION, CREW OF THE SS TYRIAN 1. I am a Loyalist Vanilla. Please see the definition <here> for further information. 2. Judging by the list of claims, I'd find it hard to believe there are two Loyalist Seekers on board (more specifically - it should never be the case that the 7 claims in the Kandra, Mistborn, and Seeker group all are Loyalists). This means somewhere between designations "Salmon Meerkat" and "Melon Dingo" there is likely a Saboteur. 3. I would extend this to the group of Lurcher claims likely not all being truthful. I would expect the Saboteurs would have immense firepower if all four were Loyalists, but such distros are often called "swingy" and "bad", according to multiple sources. There is probably some off possibility of this, and in such cases, I believe at least one Coinshot would need to be a Saboteur. 4. As I believe it was previously mentioned, there is almost zero chance all of the Mistborn and Coinshot claims are all Loyalists. 5. Due to claims not adding up, I would guess the majority of remaining Saboteurs (if not all) are hiding in the claimed roles. I would hesitantly guess that multiple Saboteurs are not claiming the same role. 6. I do not believe there is a distro where all 6 of the Coinshot and Lurcher claims are truthful Loyalists. 7. I do not believe there is a distro where all 6 of the Seeker and Lurcher claims are truthful Loyalists. 8. At this time, the Mistborn and Kandra roles are too complicated for me to determine whether I would assume a Saboteur is in the group of 5 by itself. 9. I am a little concerned at the ratio of potential Loyalist roles to Saboteur roles. Specifically on what that means for the number of Saboteurs on board. I find it very difficult to conceptualize a distro that is not extremely favored towards the Loyalists without this. PS. If anyone has seen my copy of the 8th edition of Basic Metals: An In-Depth Analysis, please contact me and return it at once. Thank you. [The message is signed but you can't make out the name through the illegible handwriting] Edit: 7a. It is possible both Seekers are Loyalists based on there being a possibly known deceased Seeker Saboteur already. More specifically, it is more likely both Seekers are Loyalists than it is that both Coinshots are Loyalists. Edited January 12 by Opal Lion
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 (edited) 52 minutes ago, Indigo Weasel said: And most likely has either a Coinshot or a Lurcher(I don’t think both as that would mean a 6-person Elim team, which seems like way to many to me) I think the issue with the 6-man team is that the D1 becomes even more inexplicable given their numbers, I'd think. Edit: 44 minutes ago, Opal Lion said: 7a. It is possible both Seekers are Loyalists based on there being a possibly known deceased Seeker Saboteur already. More specifically, it is more likely both Seekers are Loyalists than it is that both Coinshots are Loyalists. To be clear, the reason why Meerkat is in question is because Meerkat may not even be a Seeker. Meerkat's claim doesn't really match with their suspect list and Meerkat says they scanned Zebra because they forgot to put in an action so Jo gave them a free random scan. Edit 2: Ok. Don't think I can make rollover this time. Too tired and the days of short sleep are killing me and I gotta be up at...3AM or something. Anyway trust y'all, you've got this, thunderdoming Meerkat and Ocho looks correct at this juncture. I reserve the right to change my mind on my vote but yeah. Edited January 12 by Mint Heron
Recommended Posts