Epigraphs

[Munin he/him]

In the epigraphs, it's mentioned that Hoid is probably the author of the epigraphs.

However, it seems to me like theories don't really belong in a wiki.

What are the rules on this?

[Munin he/him]

I agree it's highly likely, but at least in my opinion, wikis are for confirmed facts.

Forums are more the place for unproven theories, no matter how likely.

[Chaos he/him]

You would need to clearly state that its aTHEORY, not fact, that Hoid wrote them.

[KChan she/her]

Agreed. Mentioning theories is fine, but they must be clearly labeled as such. I've even seen whole wiki pages developed to particularly deep-running theories on other wikis.

[Zas678 he/him]

*sigh* I fail at Wikis.

[Andrew the Great he/him]

Me too, zas, me too. But we don't fail at information, so if we get all the good, awesome detail in there, the people who don't fail at wikis can come along and make us feel stupid.

[Deano Stormblessed he/him]

As long as the information is there, that's all that matters. Someone can come along later and edit it to turn it into a theory, but with out the information, we would never know about the theory in the first place.