Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Marukka said:

Rayse

 

1 hour ago, Some Random Spren said:

moash?

Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
Edited by ElMonoEstupendo
Posted
2 hours ago, Marukka said:

Yes! :D

Last clue would have been "Intervention"

Nicely done!

2 hours ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Nice choices!

  1. This character cannot be trusted.

Attica Smedry?

Posted
9 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is very dangerous.

Wait, what? Can be trusted? (HAHA, you made an Oopsie! :P)

Kaladin! 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, AceBassMan said:

Nicely done!

Attica Smedry?

 

54 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Wait, what? Can be trusted? (HAHA, you made an Oopsie! :P)

Kaladin! 

Not Attica.
Not Kaladin.
Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
  3. This character became someone else.
Edited by ElMonoEstupendo
Posted
3 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Attica.
Not Kaladin.
Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
  3. This character pretends to be someone else.

Ah, I see what you're doing there... nice! :D

I have no idea who that could be (right now) but that's a great twist! 

Posted
6 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Attica.
Not Kaladin.
Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
  3. This character pretends to be someone else.

I freakin love when Ruin does his thing :D

Posted
29 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

 

Not Attica.
Not Kaladin.
Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
  3. This character pretends to be someone else.

M-Bot?

Posted
27 minutes ago, AceBassMan said:

I freakin love when Ruin does his thing :D

:D It is cool. But this time it's not Ati rewriting his own myth. Perhaps the same gimmick, though...

6 minutes ago, Marukka said:

M-Bot?

Not M-Bot.
Not Attica.
Not Kaladin.
Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
  3. This character became someone else.
  4. This character is one of many.
Posted
5 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

:D It is cool. But this time it's not Ati rewriting his own myth. Perhaps the same gimmick, though...

Not M-Bot.
Not Attica.
Not Kaladin.
Not Rayse.
Not Moash.

  1. This character can be trusted.
  2. This character is harmless.
  3. This character became someone else.
  4. This character is one of many.

Cytonic spoiler

Spoiler

Chet?

 

Posted
16 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Correct!

  Hide contents

Chet Starfinder himself!

 

Very nice choice and really awesome clues! :D

1. This character has more than one name.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Primeval Chaos said:

Hoid aka. Topaz aka. cephandrius aka. drifter aka. Wit aka. Roamer aka. Imperial Fool aka. Lunu'anaki

Nope

Not Hoid

1. This character has more than one name.
2. This character was part of an uneasy alliance.

Posted
2 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Regalia.

Nope

Not Hoid
Not Regalia

1. This character has more than one name.
2. This character was part of an uneasy alliance.
3. This character fought and was victorious over some corruption.

Posted
2 hours ago, Marukka said:

Very nice choice and really awesome clues! :D

1. This character has more than one name.

yeah that was cool ElMono :D

Firefight?

Posted
1 minute ago, AceBassMan said:

yeah that was cool ElMono :D

Firefight?

Nope

Not Hoid
Not Regalia
Not Firefight

1. This character has more than one name.
2. This character was part of an uneasy alliance.
3. This character fought and was victorious over some corruption.
4. However useful this character was, they remained one of the baddies.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Marukka said:

Nope

Not Hoid
Not Regalia
Not Firefight

1. This character has more than one name.
2. This character was part of an uneasy alliance.
3. This character fought and was victorious over some corruption.
4. However useful this character was, they remained one of the baddies.

Mmm... Rashek?

Posted
18 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Mmm... Rashek?

Nope

Not Hoid
Not Regalia
Not Firefight
Not Rashek

1. This character has more than one name.
2. This character was part of an uneasy alliance.
3. This character fought and was victorious over some corruption.
4. However useful this character was, they remained one of the baddies.
5. This character can be seriously hot.

Posted
1 hour ago, Marukka said:

Nope

Not Hoid
Not Regalia
Not Firefight
Not Rashek

1. This character has more than one name.
2. This character was part of an uneasy alliance.
3. This character fought and was victorious over some corruption.
4. However useful this character was, they remained one of the baddies.
5. This character can be seriously hot.

Obliteration.

Posted
20 minutes ago, ElMonoEstupendo said:

Obliteration.

You got it! :D

I was really rooting for you, you were do close with Regalia! B)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...