For me, at least from a thematic point of view, it was a humorous throwaway comment designed to illustrate the dangers of pure rationality used alone. That, instead of inviting contradiction, suggests to me that his master plan is flawed. Brilliant, and right on many/all points so far, but as I've said above, not infallible. The way BS is exploring principles and values tells me that the separation of intellect and compassion is vital for understanding the thematic goals of the series. I don't think we should be reading Taravangian as perfect at all. I think this is a clue pointing to the opposite conclusion.