Adolin_Dustbringer

I expanded all my creativity when I first made this character. I have none left to spare.

I'll join as Jim Bob Dirt, a dirt salesman.

Well, honestly didn't expect that. RIP me. And I was so close to winning too

Thanks for the soulcaster, Cara. Also, Awes. edit: guess I was a tad late. oops

So all I need to complete my secondary objective is the Soulcaster. Could the owner give it to me? It's for a good cause.

And funnily enough, the first vote was reversed from me to the other guy (whose name I forgot and am too lazy to look up). Wonder how much different the game would've been if I died on the first day.

Well, that was fun. Khas. Hope I get the evil role next time.

Hmmm... so all I need is an Emotion Bracelet, a Pain Knife, a Spanreed, a Grandbow, and possibly a Soulcaster (not sure if I need one to win). Would anyone like to donate them to me? It's for a good cause.

I just got the itch. it makes me feel alive I'm calling Roshar Social Services. you can have full custody.

Siding with the GBs does sound amusing (especially considering I was a bit disappointed that I didn't get the evil role this game or last). It's still a bit risky, but my chances are, as you said, better with the GBs anyway. My proposal: I steal the Grandbow tonight as a show of good will. You give me an item you don't need (the items I already have are a half-shard, a reverser, and a painrial). Providing you do this, I cooperate with your votes tomorrow and steal whatever items you ask me to. Sound fair?

Well, this game looks just about over. Might as well vote Tion anyway.

Welp... this is looking worse and worse.

Alrighty, I'll join as Jim Bob Dirt... who MAY or MAY NOT be a dirt salesman.

I honestly don't know what to believe at this point. Tion Grellin

Just to clarify, I did use a pain knife on Fnorf. And, yes, it was solely to protect me.

Well, this makes about as much sense as anything. And at this point, I must agree that every vote counts. Tion. As for the people suspecting me... I honestly never thought that me saying we shouldn't lynch someone on the first day would end up making so many people thinking I'm suspicious. Oh well, that's just how it is some times.

Well that was... not the best outcome.

Ok, just to be clear, I'm not opposed to votes on people who we aren't necessarily confirmed GB (though I won't partake in votes unless I'm certain). I was more specifically opposed to the first day's vote. But you guys also seem to think it's suspicious to not defend yourself, so...

Fair enough. I'm not actually angry or anything, I just think his argument regarding my supposed suspiciousness is a bit tenuous. I can see how my post seems a bit flame-y though, my apologies.

Oh yes, we've gained so much information. I mean, we learned that Tors and Xanas were innocent, right? Shame we had to lynch them to learn though. And are you really claiming people are suspicious based on how much they contribute to your arbitrary lynchings? That's ridiculous.

I don't exactly see why some people still think I'm suspicious. Is arguing caution REALLY that out of the ordinary? I mean, wouldn't the GB want people to lynch more liberally? And the theory that Fnord and I were fake-arguing in order to not appear associated seems a tad convoluted to me. We didn't appear associated in the first place, why go out of our way? I still don't feel certain enough to vote for anyone, so I'll refrain once again.

So what I'm wondering is: why is Macen still alive? Why didn't the GB even attack him? I'm not saying he's GB, but it certainly seems suspicious.

Sure there's a point in gathering info, I'm not opposed to that. My question is what info you can really get from accusations in the first day. Last game we lynched plenty of people who SEEMED suspicious. But how many of those people who seemed suspicious actually turned out to be PK? Already this game we've killed an innocent with an important role. How many more is it worth to kill for your supposed "information"? Honestly though, what's done is done. No point in arguing any further. We shouldn't be divisive; that's exactly what the GB want most.

How are arbitrary accusation in any way reliable? I'm not against discussion, but there is absolutely NOTHING to go on at this stage of the game. What defense do you want me to make? What defense can I make? As I said, there's nothing to go on; there's no information on which to base accusations, besides "feeling that people are suspicious", which is no basis at all. Do you want a witch-hunt? This especially makes no sense. Let's say we do what you want and randomly select a person to be lynched. And let's say they turn out to be GB. What, should we then lynch every person who defended them? That's nonsense. I'm not saying you shouldn't have people you suspect. What I'm saying is that we only help the GB by pointing fingers like this. If you suspect someone, INVESTIGATE. Don't just pile votes on them in the hope that you're right.

You know what benefits the GB even more? A noble getting lynched. The thing is, there's no point in baseless accusations. What useful discussion comes from that a random lynch vote?