Jump to content

Swimmingly

Members
  • Posts

    3138
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Swimmingly

  1. I suggest a fancy name for it then
  2. I suggest regional calendar: BE(planetary signifier) for Before Event and PE(planet SIG.) for Post Event
  3. Can a soother just state "I'm soothing the last vote on the most-voted for person" to meta, and get that done at the the end of the day?
  4. So basically doing physics calculations and substituting variables aloud?
  5. I'm using this as a confirmation mechanism - I asked our supposed Tin-set Mistborn to post one thing privately, and I'm asking our anonymous other one(s) to post a different one publicly. If the messages are all in order, Peng is a mistborn. Or an inquisitor/tineye pretending to be Mistborn
  6. He delights in telling half-truths and lying by omission, and we delight in tearing apart his words for the toffee centre. It's a happy medium.
  7. I thought it was more silvery white...
  8. By inane, I think Aether means diabolical and surprising. Because atium, malatium, electrum, gold, nicrosil, chromium, aluminum, duralumin. Given that atium can store anything, actually, our Inquisitor could be spiked with all atium and be burning one as his exclusive power every time he wants to kill anybody, or have gold metalminds already charged, or things I am scared of..
  9. Another thing: for the next night, we should make sure that the coinshot and lurcher are going for the same person.
  10. He says the only sensible thing for an inquisitor to do is to join the no-kill club, in as many words, then he does the exact opposite. That is suspicious, to me. Very, very suspicious. I still doubt you, Fnord.
  11. I notice something Fnord, here... he assumed that Inquisitors were powerful We argue, validly, that killing will hurt the crew worse than the inquisitor. He argues for a lynch, though it would be bad for us I say, kill Fnord! He's an Inquisitor! Of course, calling to lynch a guy because he argued for a lynch despite a valid argument against a lynch is kinda messed up. How about, it was a trap the whole time!
  12. But the coinshot(s), inquisitor, and maybe mistborn are goin' to be huntin' tonight, good sirs... we must be careful I guess we probably should vote to kill someone anyway, then, so we can tell who's vote was targeted.
  13. The issue is, does a vote of "no kill" count as a vote towards no deaths or just abstaining from voting? Ok, I'll gladly accept that, though his wording was a little ambiguous
  14. Yeah, I'm surprised I wasn't confused by this sooner Also, I think a nokill vote just means that you're saying, I'm not voting.
  15. Actually, I don't think the Inquisitor can have a vote modifying power yet, good sirs Also, let the noose hang loose
  16. If we assume, sirs and madames, that more than 9 Allomancers are among us and that there is only a single Inquisitor, than any kill has about a 1/3 chance of hitting a Misting and each Misting kill has a 1/2 chance of creating a spiked Misting, not to mention a 100% chance of creating a converted player, if the Inquisitor chooses to exercise his hemalurgy.
×
×
  • Create New...