Through the living Wahr

So Vote Analysis Time, there were two missleading Claims and a fes that changed the numerical value I will not count those as Misleading as thats a very slight change to make. The People that were Misleading are: Drake, he claimed to -Vote Miss but didnt Miss, she claimed to -Vote Hopper but didnt. To be fair a Missleading from Miss was expected as she again claimed four negative Votes in thread. Also the only positive claim I saw was from Ink on Drake and that turned out true. Now time for some Train analysis. There have to be elims in the leading trains, especially if coco leads with that big of a diffrence on the negative side. So The leading trains are TJ, Grass, Ink, Coco active in three of those are: Verdance (Coco, Ink, TJ), Wahr (TJ, Verdance, Coco), TJ (Ink, Coco, Verdance), Mippo (Ink, TJ, Coco), Miss (Coco, Verdance, TJ), Mint (Verdance, Ink, TJ) active in two of those are: Aman/Drake (TJ, Coco), Ink (Coco, Verdance), TUM (Ink, Coco) active in one of those are: Twin (Coco) Crossrefrencing the last two cycles in leading trains on two prior Days Grass (3,3,3); Aman/Drake (2,3,1); TJ (3,2,3); Mint (2,1,3) in leading trains on one prior Day Ink (2,-,2); Mippo (2,-,3) TUM(-,1,2); Twin (-,3,1); Wahr (-,3,3); Miss (-,2,3) So I dont like how Grass, Mint, TJ and Aman/Drake are constantly part of leading execution trains. So I am growing more suspicious of them. especially with Drake trying to obfuscat who the Gryffindor Prefect is and being misleading about his votes after advocating for the color coded system. So my Votes will go to Drake, TJ and Grass for now VC: (1-3) Drake Wahr (1-3) (1-3) Grass Wahr (1-3) (1-3) TJ Wahr (1-3) I got friendship with Ravenclaw Ed1t: The train Count should be correct now, didnt have time to add on which trains there were yet, but the important info should all be correct now. Ed2t Added who was part of which trains

We accept that it is happening but unfortunately Gods cannot exist on the mortal plane, so as Part of your descendence unto the mortal plane you loose all god like Qualitäts and turn into a human I wish that I had more time to read (No way that this goes wrong, right?)

Current VC which is should be mostly accurate except for @DrakeMarshall being extremely confusing about if his -3 is on Coco or TJ also not sure if thats a yello or an orange on Miss. Also unsure if Coco intends to Vote on TJ or not. (10-16) Coco: Drake (3), Wahr (1-3), Mippo (1), TJ (2-3), Miss (0-3), Ink (3) (8-9) Ink: Coco (3), Mippo (3), TJ (2-3) (5-10) Hopper: Wahr (1-3), Ink (2), Mippo (2), Miss (0-3) (3)TJ: Drake (3) (2-7) Ver: Wahr (1-3), TJ (1), Miss (0-3) (2) TUM: Drake (2) (1-2) Miss: Drake (1-2) (0-3) Drake: Miss (0-3) Honestly I preferd the System from last Cycle, which was proposed by Aman and worked very well. In order to show your current votes you would post the full VC updated with your Votes, the next person would copy it over and edit in their Votes and so on.

I mean Through the living Grass did, and he is still alive, so I think you will be fine.

Maybe @Archer used RNG to decided in that case or maybe he decided based on which Obliviate was submitted first? But it is possible that Coco tried to stop Grass but Grass Obliviate took priority obliviating Doc

There is also the possibility of a very risky gambit were you make someone belive that he doesnt have a spell anymore, by claiming to oblivate him but dont actually doing it.

Current VC (7-10) Coco: TJ (2-3), Wahr (1-3), Drake (3), Mippo (1) (8-9) Ink: TJ (2-3), Mippo (3), Coco (3) (3-5) Hopper: Wahr (1-3), Mippo (2) (2-4) Grass: Wahr (1-3), TJ (1) (2) TUM: Drake (2) (2) TJ: Coco (2) TJ claimed Ravenclaw Prefect and I think he said that he Protegoed Aman.

You know that like three of us selfvoted for Prefect C1 What do you mean e!Doc, he was NKed and flipped as Village My Reason for voting Qian was obviously that he is a copy cat

I have the feeling that Mippo wasnt very active so far, or at least nothing he said stood out to me much, the most notable thing was forgetting to vote last Cycle but that is NAI in my Oppinion.

Have never played with you before, so I dont think its impossible. But as stated Option1 is the most likely out of the 3 at least in my oppinion.

So I dont really like whats going on with Coco/Grass here. There are a few possibilities here: e/v: either e!coco wanted to remove a village spell disguising it as trying to remove an elim spell or v!coco actually removed an elim spell v/v: v!coco tried to remove an elim spell but removed an village spell e/e: its a very elaborate scheme between e!coco and e!grass to hide an elim spell. I would say the e/v option is probably the most likely will slightly change up my vote, removing TJ from it and voting instead on Coco (3-6) Coco: TJ (2-3), Wahr (1-3) (2-4) Grass: Wahr (1-3), TJ (1) (2-3) Ink: TJ (2-3) (1-3) Hopper: Wahr (1-3)

Qian is invorrect, Leokadius (little Leo) cape is obviously cooler thatn Leonidas (Big Leo) I mean Leokadius cape has a Coat of Arms so its obviously the cooler one.

Yes I know double posting is to be avoided but I had only now time to do the Analysis and felt like it warranted its own post: So the leading Trains in both directions probably contain elims. Especially since another Prefect who got Extra Credit was murdered today: Active in 3 of 5 trains were: Grass (Doc, TJ, Coco) Twin (Doc, TJ, Qian) Aman/Drake (TJ, Mint, Qian) Wahr (TJ, Coco, Qian) Active in 2 of 5 trains were: Miss (Doc, Coco) Emepror/Aeternum (Doc, Coco) TJ (Coco, Mint) Active in 1 of 5 trains were: Coco (Doc) TUM (Mint) Mint (Qian) These do not include votes from dead Players. Since they were revealed to be Village. Now lets Crossrefrence it with the Data from Last Cycle. Grass and TJ were both active in 3 leading trains yesterday Aman, Ink, Coco, Mippo and Mint were active in 2 leading trains yesterday. People that were active in leading trains on both Days: Grass (3, 3) TJ (3, 2) Aman/Drake (2, 3) Coco (2, 1) Mint (2, 1) Now from those five I am most Suspicious of: Grass he was active in many leading trains across both Cycles and there is the wierd situation with the Hufflepuff Prefect. I am also not a big fan how active Aman/Drake and TJ were in those trains. Also Hopper continues to not Vote at all. Current VC (1-3) TJ: Wahr (1-3) (1-3) Grass: Wahr (1-3) (1-3) Hopper: Wahr (1-3) I will hold of on Voting the PHs this Cycle since I dont want to judge them solely on the actions of their predecessors.

Well 4 villagers are dead, There were a lot of people joking about secret roles, which was initiated by a bluff/reaction test from Aman Some of us post who we will put our votes on and keep a public VC.

Little RP: Leokadius was not doing well, he had found friends in his house sure, but Hogwarts was supposed to be safe. There had been 3 murders in the first few days of the school year as well as two expulsions. He wasnt sure anymore if it his parents were right sending him here.

So time for my Daily Analysis on who was misleading with their claimed Votes So most of the Vote Claims were true. Miss claim on Hopper and Amans claim on TUM were misleading, but because they each claimed 4 negative votes, 1 misleading was expected. Against her Claim, Coco didnt vote Hopper but that might have been due to Amans claim that anyone voting Hopper would be evil. Aman was also very misleading about his positive votes but that isnt suprising seeing his original vote claim for them was extremely vague so I will not hold it against him/his PH

Updated VC with Miss Fallens Votes: (4-12) Coco: Wahr (1-3), Qian (1-3), TJ (1-3), Miss (1-3) (3-9) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), Qian (1-3) (3-9) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), Mint (1-3) (3-9) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), TJ (1-3) (2-6) TUM: Aman (1-3), Mint (1-3) (2-6) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), TJ (1-3) (1-3) Doc: Mint (1-3), (1-3) Hopper: Miss (1-3) (1-3) Grass: Miss (1-3) (1-3) Aman: Miss (1-3)

Thats the possible negative values each of them could have. Since we didnt show the exact distribution of our Votes there are multiple possiblities how much negative votes they recieved. I made a small error, your total is also 2-6. I have now fixed it in the original post.

Adding my Own negative Votes on Qian and Coco to the list (2-6) Mint: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Miss: Doc12 (1-3), Aman (1-3), (2-6) Qian: Aman (1-3),Wahr (1-3), (1-3) Ink: Doc12 (1-3), (1-3) TUM: Aman (1-3), (1-3) Coco: Wahr (1-3), My current positives are still TUM and TJ

(Well technically I should be working right now) If I were elim, which I am not. I would avoid Votes that would seem strange to the Generall thread, depending on the situation, I would try to avoid voting teammates but depending on the situation could do it to not stand out to much.

I dont care that much about the Votes cast last Cycle, since my retrospective count of them seems somewhat inacurate, which makes it not particualarly usefull. But this Cycle I will keep Track of them so I can make a more usefull comparison next Cycle. But the amount of people that have shared their votes so far is not very big. (You and Doc)

Yeah, you are probably right that I shoulnt continue to vote for you without any reason. Will remove my Negative vote on you

I tried but they only include the negative votes, I wanted both for my list, also it was a lot easier to use Docs Vote count since it listed the placed votes and not the recieved votes like yours, but I believe I did use yours to gather some of the numerical values, the other ones I got from searching the thread. Which is abusrdely hard if everyone represents their votes diffrently and I had 11 pages to search. well that is something I coulnd have known. Also what were your reasons for that conclusion

So apparently we have already abbandoned the idea of sharing vote and having accountability. I unfortunately didnt take notes on who claimed to vote for whom But scanning the thread and using Docs last Vote count I have created an hopefully accurated Table regarding who people claimed to vote and who they voted, if I missed something please let me now (and link the relevant post) Things to Note, Aman apparently lied completely. I dont like that since he is the one that proposed it. He warned us that there was Missinformation in his posted Votes but I had assumed there would be truth to it none the less. Grass lied about 1 of 3 votes (10/30) Coco lied about 2 of 5 votes (12/30) Twin lied about 1 of 6 votes (5/30) Qian lied about 1 of 2 votes (15/30) TUM did not lie about any Votes, if hed did it would have been an instant red flag for me. I could see an Coco / Twin e/e pair considering they lied about voting each other So in order to get the Vote sharing back on here are my current votes Positives: TUM and TJ (appreciate the honesty and TUM sticking to the acountability) Negatives: Aman, coco, Doc (dont like how much Aman and Coco have lied about their votes, Doc is still under generall suspicion) Now if anyone points out mistakes I made, I will gladly correct them and depending on the Mistake am Open to changing my current votes

Beware it is I "HALVING THROUGH WITHER"