Straw
-
Posts
2547 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
3
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Straw
-
Cool! More SE relatives!
-
1. Please don't double post @Grumpy Dula 2. Which SE player is your brother? 3. I was saying yes that the KotD needs to die to complete their win con.
-
Yes. Yes. Yes.
-
Role: The Keeper of the Dead: This player has access to the dead doc and has complete control over the rules that govern what happens to dead players (can edit, create, and delete), they also have access to all of the abilities of dead players, and can use one dead player ability each turn. Their win con is to have every player eventually be dead. This player retains all of their abilities when dead.
-
@AliasSheep Can we make multiple roles with our rule?
-
@Bort That would probably violate my rule, causing one of our rules to be RNGed out of the game.
-
@Eternum That doesn't really seem like very many PMs.
-
Eternum, that doesn't seem like very many PMs. EDIT: Sheep has said in discord that she would be fine with infinite PMs.
-
... So, every single action has a 10% chance of something weird happening?
-
Noooooooooooooooooo!!! EDIT: @AliasSheep and @STINK how many PMs are you guys OK with dealing with?
-
Infinite PMs! Group PMs allowed! You can PM dead players!
-
@little wilson How would your rule interact with "passive" rules like mine, Orlok's, Flash's, and King Cole's? @STINK Why exactly is my rule, (minus the part that got vetoed by you) game breaking enough to be possibly vetoed?
-
Jondesu, should the player name be an@mention?
-
What are the exact mechanics of your rule?
-
Flash: I have a few questions about your rule: 1. There is currently no second realm. Did you mean that they loose the extra life from King Cole's rule? 2. You never said what happens on a tie vote. 3. You never said what happens to a player if they get red voted. 4. Can you vote on the GMs (you should be able to!)? 5. Can dead players vote via GM PM (please say yes)?
-
Addition to my rule: each faction can once per turn give one of the players in it an item, however, the faction has to also take on an additional win con (both the item and the new win con have to been approved as suitably interesting and balanced by the GMs).
-
@Flash I noticed you have a small rule! Would you like to be the one to decide the rules for the voting system?
-
Notes on the rules so far: @King Cole Why do you want double lives? That seems like it'd slow down the game a lot. If you just want people to be able to participate in the game more, I'd suggest making a rule that allows dead players to influence the game in some way. There's no lynch so far! What'll we ever do without a lynch!
-
Addition to my rule: Each faction's members can make up their own win con, however, it has to be approved as suitably interesting by the GM.
-
But then if there were 30+ players's there'd only be 7+ factions! BTW, Sheep said in discord that unless somebody fleshes out the factions, the factions will be generic and boring.
-
The problem with that is that if there were 30+ players, there'd be 15+ factions
-
Due to my rule causing potential difficulties in balancing the game, I will instead have my rule be that there must be at least 10 factions in the game. Players can be a member of multiple factions, and each faction must have a unique win con.
-
Clarification on my rule: my rule means that every player has to have at least one unique win con and ability. This way, my rule won't conflict with any rules that create new factions.
-
If RNG kicks out our rule, can we propose a new rule?
-
Single cycle please. EDIT: BTW You could just make the single cycle/double cycle vote into a poll
