Jump to content

Master Elodin

Members
  • Posts

    1353
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Master Elodin

  1. Well, regardless of me not realizing that you hadn't voted for Gunshy, my point still stands. You did help move the Sart lynch along and you are still suspicious of Gunshy for semantical reasons, regardless of the fact that you are apparently good at wording things clearly and Haelbarde correctly interpreted what you said (even though his interpretation doesn't make me wrong). Also, I'm not trying to stop discussion of Gunshy (even though that comparison is ridiculous), I'm just analyzing your behavior and how it matches up to the mindset and actions of Padan Fain. Even if I misunderstood your meaning, your intents would be the same. Also, Gamma never said that someone couldn't have two roles. EDIT: Ninjad by Maill.
  2. Ok, Wilson. First, my assumption was completely reasonable. Second, you deliberately cut out the edit. But enough about him, let's talk about you. You are nearly cleared of being a Darkfriend, but there's one thing that you aren't cleared of: being Padan Fain. Now, let's go back and look at your actions for a second, and see what they reveal. First Day: You lynch Sart. This is good for us, as he was a Forsaken. But what was your initial reason for lynching him? Semantics. At least to me, it seemed like you were searching for a reason to lynch someone without much contest. This alone makes me suspicious. Then, the second Day rolls around. Second Day: Hmm, ok, you're voting for Gunshy. I wonder why this is. Oh! I see. It's another semantically constructed reason! Better yet, one that was could be interpreted in at least ten different ways. For some reason, you decided to immediately interpret it in the most damning way possible. And now you suggest that a Wolf-Brother kills him. No, you strongly suggest it. Is this because you want him to die even if you can't convince everyone to lynch him? Seems likely. So, there you have it, ladies and gents. My strongest suspicion for the day.. I give you.. Wilson! To sum up, she has repeatedly tried to lynch people with no reason, and also recently suggested killing one with no real reason. All of these things suggest that she's a Darkfriend, but she can't be one. Therefore, the only logical solution is that she is Padan Fain! EDIT: Dangit, I can't make Padan pink! EDIT: Thanks Hael. It's not perfect but it works. EDIT: Yay! It works!
  3. Sigs and titles. Also I assume that Gunshy has read Wilsons sig, and looked through some old games. Those make it evident that both Wilson and Meta are scary players.
  4. I'm talking about why they wouldn't have detained me if I was on their team- they would've known that I couldn't be targeted. EDIT: Really, Elb? You're going to say that names like "Bloodthirsy Goddess" or "True Divinity" don't instill fear or at least awe?
  5. I don't actually remember being suggested as a scanee. Killee, yes, but not scanee.EDIT: This was pretty much implied in the beginning of this thread- I was under suspicion, but no one that I know of suggested to scan me. Unless you have a PM with Straw. That would explain it. Also, your confusion was hilarious.
  6. Nah, I'm not a Whitecloak. You're getting closer though. Kinda. Also, I'm assuming that Nyali is a Thief-Taker, but correct me if I'm wrong.
  7. Wilson, the first game I played I knew about you guys, so your argument about that part is completely invalid. Honestly, people have you in their member titles ! You can't get much more well know than that. Also, the Darkfrinds would have known that I was a Dreamwalker. EDIT: See my post, jaime.
  8. I was directly quoting Jaimeleecee's post when I was talking about a Whitecloak eliminator. As for the first post, I don't want to get into this spiral of bluffs and double bluffs being assumed.
  9. Why would I admit to being detained then, since it's the obvious conclusion? I agree that it looks bad though. Why would the eliminators protect me instead of detaining Straw? This makes no sense.EDIT: I'd love to stay and prove my innocence, but I have to go to school.
  10. Actually five.1. Straw was RB'd. 2. Straw lied. 3. I was detained. <--- It's this one. 4. Mask of Mirrors on me. 5. I dreamwalked. (if applicable) Why does it make me suspicious? Because of the missing eliminator kill? EDIT: Jaimeleecee, Occam's Razor. You all think I'm an eliminator. Detaining blocks action from eliminators. Actions from eliminators are bad actions.
  11. Eurythmics' Sweet Dreams (Are Made of This).
  12. I believe that I explained myself already, Seonid. There was no real reason for any of the candidates, so I jumped at the slightest suspicion-inducing thing.EDIT: Also, I trust Meta, for any of you who would like to know.
  13. Roleblock or protection most likely. Hopefully the first, because then we would have caught someone.
  14. 1. Charybdis 2. Scylla 3. Elves 4. Dark Elves 5. Jotun 6. The Void Cow 7. Surtur 8. Kraken 9. Gryphon 10. Pegasus 11. Hippogriff 12. Harpy 13. Zombie 14. Fae 15. Hellhounds 16. Giants 17. Kappa 18. Pixies 19. Puca 20. Hydra WLIU name 15 methods used to assassinate kings in books.
  15. It's 18th in line for LG. I have a rough draft by now but if you'd like to help design and flesh it out/smooth it out shoot me a PM.
  16. I just saw this (emphasis mine). Also can we stop talking about the Fain thing and talk about something more important? For example, do you guys think that the eliminators have a Channeller? If so, how do we deal with it?
  17. That kind of cements Maill as definitely not Padan Fain. That's good. Elb, do you mind looking at the Young Wizards thing?
×
×
  • Create New...