Jump to content

STINK

Moderators
  • Posts

    2796
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by STINK

  1. Elbereth, you said plenty thanks In fact, looking at Elbereths plan I think that it would be better to do that one as then no-one should have to worry about names being leaked or anything, but we can still see how close/far away the HI is to being subverted. It also allows Araris to actually do some stuff with his ability or maybe just plain deduction skills etc I don't think Elkanah has posted?
  2. 9/10 Looks pretty cool, but lacks the cultural reference that most profile pics have. Though it is also unique, which is good in a profile pic.
  3. I totally know what jurisprudence is, and not because I just googled it. And most people say that Politics is boring, so is it exciting or boring?
  4. You're writing about a 'battle-by-essay' in what looks to be an essay? Is this a challenge to the teacher of that class?
  5. Well I can't say that I didn't see this happening, the joke was too good to pass up. I won't vote for Wilson, cause based on other games people will want the Wilson to talk anyway. I'll vote for the person that no-one expects to see it going to, Elbereth! (they're new and a sibling, right? If not please tell me who is, thanks) All you have to is talk, Elbereth.
  6. I am still staying in the game, but the rules lawyer known as NoName is resigning, and his client Jack is coming aboard! Italics = What they are thinking in either Dialogue or Mental Conversation (It's a bit confusing I know) Normal = Dialogue or in the case of a mental dialogue, what is being thought without speaking. < Jack's POV > " I have asked all the questions that you requested and more, and feel confident enough to let you know that no complications should arise" NoName said. I really should find out his name sometime, and what is with the Spikes in his head? " Thank you, any reason why you need metals for the payment?" Jack inquired, as he was unaware of the powers that some had in the Cosmere. " You don't know? I can assure you that you will learn much in this mission, and that I hope you return in good health" Why is he talking about my health? This lawyer sure is odd, but he was recommended to me by Leyton, so he must be good. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < NoName's POV > He didn't know why this bumbling fool was going on the mission, but it did give him a chance to speak to the captain, who looked oddly familiar. I TRUST THAT YOU HAVE SUCCESSFULLY GOT JACK ON THE MISSION? Yes, is there anything else? JACK IS MORE IMPORTANT TO ME THAN YOU THINK, AND THERE WILL BE THOSE WHO WISH TO KILL HIM ON THAT SHIP, MAKE SURE THAT ONE OF THEM HAS SEEN THE WAYS OF OUR CAUSE. As you command And so NoName went off to find a traitor, so that Leyton could continue to have things as he would want. Not that it would be good for the other passengers.
  7. I'm just gonna say here, (mainly to DeathClutch) that while aggravating people to deliberately get some secrets out of them is a strategy, when the person replies and is annoyed/overly defensive, it isn't always because they are evil but also because they are being aggravated. I don't think many people would respond with smiles of joy if this tactic was used against them, and if you wanna see when this tactic goes wrong, just look at Seonids death in the previous LG, where I tunneled and aggravated someone who turned out to be a great asset to the town, though Kipper may not be a great asset to the town
  8. Kipper, I wanted to see some analysis After all, if everyone says that the people who write long posts are dying, shouldn't we get the last few remaining to do their job? Also, I wanted to see you write a post after a whole cycle with no posts from Kipper! Do you have to ask me the same question for every post? I'm not really sure who to vote now, anyone know any other people who may pride themselves on their analysis skills that may not be doing much of it?
  9. I am back from holiday now, so I have internet again! But I also have lots of work to do (though none of it is useful) that I must complete, so will have to spend less time on SE. That said, basic thought here but couldn't we have one coinshot reveal themselves, then have a lurcher on them and that way we most definitely threaten the skaa as we can tell the coinshot what to kill, and see if any emotional allomancy happens on them, confirming that there is at least either a soother or rioter with the skaa, as well as making the skaa be in more danger due to there being a threat of the lynch and a coinshot. Someone could also watch the alleged coinshot to see if they actually performed an action on the target. There are probably faults here that I can't think about, because I made up this plan as I went along
  10. You include the GM in PMs, so that they can see what you're talking about to see if you might be cheating but also so that they can laugh at what you think is going on. And to make a PM, you click the letter at the top of the screen and click compose new message, then from there it's pretty self-explanatory.
  11. I will admit with you when you say that I seemed to vote for Creccio without reason, or at least seemed to. And I clearly explained why I was voting for Ripple in my post, which Ripple has not responded to but that is hopefully because they haven't been online yet. I am interested to know why you haven't talked about this Zephrer thing like the posts above you but instead were talking about me, a seemingly resolved problem. To quote you, "Looks a little bit like a skaa"
  12. Why are people becoming Rubix? Am II seeing things?
  13. When the Banter gets going, it is the Archbishops job (Rubix) to make sure that it doesn't stop for no-one.
×
×
  • Create New...