-
Posts
5932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
News
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Events
Everything posted by Amanuensis
-
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Not really. If I'm to die, maybe we just promote Kas? @Matrim's Dice you can go back to voting me btw, it's chill Aman (3): Archer, Wit, Aeoryi Wit (2): Kas, Devo Mat (2): Raven, Araris Archer (1): JNV Kas (1): Aman Nobody (4): Mat, Ash, STINK, TJ -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
My last VC was wrong lol Aman (4): Archer, Mat, Wit, Aeoryi Wit (3): Kas, Aman, Devo Mat (2): Raven, Araris Archer (1): JNV Nobody (3): Ash, STINK, TJ thisisfine.jpg ED1T: NINJAS EVERYWHERE -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Aman (3): Archer, Mat, Wit Raven (3): Kas, Aman, Aeoryi Mat (2): Raven, Araris Archer (1): JNV Nobody (4): Devo, Ash, STINK, TJ Since no one else was doing it I believe this is correct -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
TBH not really I'd have a more firm vote if I had any solid suspicions at this stage -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I'm slightly more leaning toward v!Archer rn, despite my annoyance Wit seems opportunistic tho. -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Because of a fire joke? Lol. "Mostly vibes." "Everyone else is basically null." "IDK about a Archer case but I'll attempt to articulate my feelings." It's like you guys don't even read my posts, you just see my name/PFP and get scared Have you seen me RP? It's obviously not a priority, silly goose ED1T: @Archer Not to mention that RP point was under "And some minor / supplementary things" ED2T: @Archer And the fact that I said this: "I suppose Archer is the type of villager who would do that too," which clearly indicated reevaluation before your Windrunner claim / me deciding to be nice smh Surely you know Kas and I have been PMing this entire time discussing the game, and surely you know I don't always spill every single bean in thread when I can instead be looking for reactions / baiting votes ED3T: Like, part of my bafflement is only my first post exists within a vacuum. Everything else was a result of someone coaxing more out of me I.E. Kas asked me if I thought if elims would gun for RP Ideals, so I gave the objectively correct answer. -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Hopefully I don't have to be the one to address a certain pattern that's developing here -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
The misrepresentation here is a lil silly I didn't come in hot, unless you consider putting a vote down after pinch hitting to a game with ~12 hours in the first cycle left as coming in hot. Or unless you think Kas publicly asking me to explain my thoughts, and my subsequent articulation of my C1 suspicious of Archer, as coming in hot. Sorry for contributing? Also sorry for reevaluating? And mercy? Same game different month I swear smh -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Raven I guess 2 hours 15 min I think -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
That's very fair, and I'm sorry for putting you into that position! I'm open to voting elsewhere, hence me throwing a vote on Archer opposition with no public explanation -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I just noticed it lmao. Btw who you wanna vote? @Fifth Scholar back to Mat -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Oh ok Archer bad then >:) Hm. Yeah that’s a problem. Sadge -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Thank you! Mat. Archer read hasn’t necessarily changed. Could go either way, but now that he’s claimed I’d rather let him prove it / that he’s not tonight’s killer. @Archer could you remove one of the one votes? Ultimately your decision, but at this stage I don’t think Adhesion is helpful/necessary in affecting todays exe directly. -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I had a similar reaction Goodnight! ED1T: Quick someone else post so I can shift my vote -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Tbh I could see a e!Archer/e!Mat world, if that’s what you mean (shading his partner without voting because it’s expected of Archer to fixate on Mat, but he still wants a Villager dead instead). You’ll have to remind me which game 94 was or more specifically, the context of the sphincter tightening I’m pretty sure I misunderstood what you were getting at there with shooting the second most voted player, though. I shy away from black and white thinking in general, especially when based on speculating scenarios that haven’t happened yet. And TBF to Fifth, if I did pinch hit into elim, that’s not really his fault Exp would have been the choice to be evil and I reckon I was slotted in as a PH before others simply because I was the most readily available. C1s are hard what can I say Archer (3): Aman, JNV, Aeoryi Mat (2): Raven, Araris Raven (1): Kas JNV (1): Mat Devo (1): Archer Nobody (): Devo, Wit, Ash, STINK, TJ -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I think you're views are correct here. Explicitly vigshooting all second place votes is certainly a good way to deter elims from accumulating that power too quickly, but naturally that comes with the risk of us maiming our own, so I think rather than having a hard-and-fast rule, we're better off staying vigilant of the game state and making the right adjustments at half time. Looking forward to the results I'd expect elims to go for any and all available powers as swiftly as possible, yeah. Of course, this should be what every player is doing, but we also know that's rarely what happens on either team, due to a wide variety of factors (motivation, time, whim, etc). So it's not really a strong point for e!Archer, imo, but something I felt worth noting nonetheless. That + I do think Archer is the type of elim who would always go for the practical power boost and get it done regardless of their circumstances. (ED1T: I suppose Archer is the type of villager who would do that too I just also think v!Archer would have more oomph here) Sorta? I'm probably not explaining it well enough (I slept terribly last night and the mental exhaustion is hitting me), but I think it's a perspective thing too? I'm trying to understand the place Archer is coming from / what his goals are, and they don't inherently feel V-sided, if that makes sense. I might be down for a Mat vote btw -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Pun always intended! Also, rude! Weird D&D Friends mashup sounds lit tho glad you're here nonetheless o7 Fair enough. My initial read of them has been 'sensible,' which probably tells me more about them as a person rather than as a player in this game. I'll look back at their content and keep an eye on them going forward to see if anything sticks out. IDK about a Archer case but I'll attempt to articulate my feelings Initial stance on the second most votes = sworn ideal thing feels... naive, for lack of a better word? Disarming? I kinda like the second word more cause that's the vibe I'm getting off Archer this game in general. Almost like he's advocating complacence? His votes so far feel more low-effort / toothless than I'd expect from him. To demonstrate, here's some quotes (This moment is odd to me because he's already admitted his Ash vote is just... because... so why not leave it on Exp / why go back at all?) And he switches to Devo in a very unserious way, which to me feels like he's not very invested in the result of the exe today. He's also fixated on Mat a couple times without actually voting him, which feels like a very E!Archer thing to me, though I'm not sure if there's necessarily a historical precedence for that. I feel like in the case of V!Archer fixating on Mat, he usually pushes harder / redder. I'd quote but eh, just the ones above were more work than I thought they'd be, so I recommend going through his last few posts to see what I mean. And some minor / supplementary things Potential slip with the whole "shoot" thing Already hit today's RP ideal goal Lots of words, and thus an equal amount of contribution (theoretically), but it feels a little empty / destinationless, if that makes sense. The journey might be (debatedly) more important than the end, however, it mostly feels fluffy or semanticsy to me, in a way that evokes "I'm a bad boi who doesn't want people to think I'm a bad boi" I think there was one or two more things but my attention span is slipping. Would rather do some shorter back and forth posts with players than any cases/essays or the like, tbh TL;DR ARCHER BAD ED1T: Slander! Lies and slander! TY -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
TYVM, Good Sir GM, Sir! Based on past experience, I expect the opposite, personally I was going to make a comment about me not being here, but then I learned how to read. Also what's your Raven case? Heck yeah brother! Hi Aeoryi! Glad to see you've stuck around! Sure. I want to kill Archer with fire. Mostly cuz of vibes. (and no I'm not a dustyboi) RE: 2nd-place-vote-gaining-power, in an ideal world (heh... get it... ideal!), the village is best off being proactive about it, but alas, reality is seldom ideal, so at best I expect us to collectively keep track and police our neighbours or w/e. I'm gonna have to force myself to RP aren't I? My brain has not been cooperating in the writing department lately, but as a firm advocate of RP-contribution-role-systems, it'd be a shame if I slipped through the cracks Everyone other than Archer and Kasimir is basically Null rn. BONUS: I am so not used to the site update lol. What do you mean the edit button is in a drop down menu on the top right of posts now? GAH! ALSO can I get a VC plz ED2T: Everyone feel free to ask me lots of specific questions about anything game related so I can get my brain on the right track o7 -
Mid-Range Game 66: Knights of Wind and Truth
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Whoops just queued a Valorant game without realizing I got tagged in be back in ~40 -
Mid-Range Game 65: Set on Infiltration
Amanuensis replied to Experience's topic in Sanderson Elimination
GG everyone -
Mid-Range Game 65: Set on Infiltration
Amanuensis replied to Experience's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I will be spectating eagerly Thankfully, you should have plenty of experienced players to help you out Welcome! -
Quick Fix Game 67: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Ash GG friends o7 cya in the aftermath- 683 replies
-
1
-
- and worse than ever
- joe game???
- (and 9 more)
-
Quick Fix Game 67: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Ashbringer Poppin' bottles in the ice, like a blizzard When we drink, we do it right, gettin' slizard Sippin' sizzurp in my ride (in my ride) like Three 6 Now I'm feelin' so fly like a G6- 683 replies
-
- and worse than ever
- joe game???
- (and 9 more)
-
Quick Fix Game 67: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Dang only red pieces here eh. Stick- 683 replies
-
- and worse than ever
- joe game???
- (and 9 more)
-
Quick Fix Game 67: Down the Rabbit-Hole
Amanuensis replied to Fifth Scholar's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Quick tell me who to vote lul- 683 replies
-
- and worse than ever
- joe game???
- (and 9 more)
