Jump to content

treblkickd

Members
  • Posts

    100
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by treblkickd

  1. On 10/29/2020 at 2:50 PM, robardin said:

    Yet the Fused must have come first, before the Heralds formed the Oathpact, as you point out that the main point of it was to be able to hold back the Fused on Braize in between Desolations. And as evidenced by the False Desolation, it's not like the "parsh" didn't continue to resist and to fight without them; they were simply without immortal leaders with many lifetimes of experience, and without their power of Surges and Thunderclasts, until such time as one of the Heralds "broke" and "their gods" were able to return to them.

    Agreed on all points, though I am still trying to get a clear understanding in my head of how the Fused came to be, and also how the Fused came to control surge (and also why they only seem to have access to nine of the ten surges).

    Two potentially related pieces of information that seem to complicate things are:

    1) the Fused did not initially have access to the Surges according to the Stormfather (Oathbringer Ch 38), and specifically on this topic the Stormfather says, "...even before the Fused learned to command the surges...", which make it sounds like their surge-related abilities are learned skills that they picked up on their own (???)

    2) it is still not clear what "voidbinding" actually is - does it refer generally to using voidlight to power surges, or is it a a specific mechanism for gaining access to surges (which could be powered by voidlight or stormlight)? I guess the other side of that question would be, "technically speaking, what is surgebinding?" Is it a mechanism (bonding with a spren) to gain access to surges, or is it the use of a specific source (stormlight) to use surges. For example, Renarin has some weird abilities, but how are we supposed to characterize them? Does he both voidbind and surgebind? He seems, so far, to exclusively use stormlight, so if he's doing any voidbinding then that would seem to imply that voidbinding can be powered with stormlight or voidlight (this makes sense to me in that different forms of investiture can power different systems, sometimes via "hacks" along the lines of Vasher substituting stormlight for breaths). The other pieces that must fit in here somewhere are the Regals, which seem to me to be the most likely cases of "pure" voidbinding (i.e., you become one by binding a voidspren in your gemheart). This would make the Regals the natural counterpart of the Knights Radiant, but it all feels very nebulous based on the available information.

    I'll also note that re: the Unmade, I just noticed that there is in fact a WoB that directly relates the Unmade to the "Great Spren", indicating that the analogs to the Unmade are indeed spren like the Stormfather and the Nightwatcher:

     

    Quote

     

    Brandon Sanderson (paraphrased)

    1) The Nightwatcher and Stormfather are parallel entities such that Nighwatcher:Cultivation :: Stormfather:Honor.

    2) There is sort of a parallel for Odium, but the parallel is the various Unmade instead of a single entity.

    3) They are parallel in that they are all Splinters.

    4) The Unmade are voluntary Splinters, because Odium ("like almost all of the other Shards") voluntarily Splintered part of it's power.

    5) The Stormfather is different from the others because it's a Sliver.

    JordanCon 2016 (April 23, 2016)

     

     

     

  2. Great thread - I've been looking for a discussion about the Fused and their powers! There are a few things about the fused that really puzzle me, and I'm kind of amazed at how little we actually know about them and their abilities. Based on the things that we do know I've started to wonder if the Fused are more like analogs to the Heralds than the Radiants. Specifically, consider the following:

     

    1) The Fused seem to be fixed in number - Odium made them at some point in the past and we have no evidence (that I'm aware of, at least) of their ranks increasing over time.

    2) Vasher basically tells us point blank in RoW that in "realmatic" terms the Fused are the same thing (cognitive shadows) as the Heralds.

    3) We now know that the fundamental purpose of the Oathpact is to use the Heralds to bind the Fused on Braize. There is no evidence that I'm aware of that directly pits the Heralds' existence against the Unmade (rather it seems that the Unmade are spren-like forces that never leave Roshar).

    4) There's a natural tendency to compare the Unmade to the Heralds, but many (most) of the Unmade are force-of-nature-like spren, and doesn't that make them more similar to the "great spren" associated with the Bondsmiths?

     

    Now, there are obviously no clear equivalents to the Honor blades among the Fused, but that could just reflect Odium's preference to divest less of himself into his minions. In any event, I'm super excited to learn more about the Fused and where they came from.

     

  3. Firstly, I think it's highly misleading to exclude Dalinar's flashbacks for the purpose of comparing relative dominance of the narrative. The flashbacks were just as much a part of his arc in OB as his present-time PoVs.

    That said, I think that it's a very good thing that Shallan was a prominent character in this book. Of the "main three" protagonists thusfar, I find Shallan to be the most interesting and well-written by a pretty wide margin. While Brandon generally struggles with "show, don't tell" character development, I think his writing of Shallan demonstrates some of the best signs of how much he's improved over the years. 

    Maybe I'm in the minority here, but across all three Stormlight books so far, I've struggled the most getting into Dalinar's chapters, and I'm a little relieved that his flashback book is done and out of the way. It's going to get really interesting moving forward as we next have two books with flashbacks devoted to characters outside of the "main three". 

  4. After reading through this thread and thinking on it a bit more, I had a new thought. As we've progressed through the Cosmere we've recognized more and more world-hoppers appearing in Sanderson's books, with most of these still being at the "easter egg" level of importance. How awesome would it be for Shallan to become a world-hopper, appearing in future non-SA Cosmere books? She'd be an entertaining addition to all kinds of scenes, and her connections to world-hoppers on Roshar, plus her lightweaving ability, make it pretty easy to imagine her as one who eventually traverses the Cosmere. She's also the kind of character that would pretty easy to identifying off of dialogue, alone, even if she were to always be lightweaving-up new costumes.

  5. I think Shallan is the best character that Brandon has ever written, by a wide margin.

    The Stormlight Archive (and to some degree, most Cosmere novels) feature a ton of characters with serious psychological and emotional issues. In all cases it's pretty clear what Sanderson is going for (e.g., Kaladin is manic-depressive, Jasnah relies on strict behavioral crutches to handle emotional trauma, Renarin is Renarin) but I've found the execution many of these characters' personalities to be wooden at times (Kaladin being the worst offender, I think). Shallan, on the other hand, is a joy to read. I think my favorite piece from Oathbringer might be this bit of Shallan PoV from Chapter 30:

    Quote

    She didn’t attack like the prim, excitable girl who had been trained by cautious Vorin society. She attacked like the frenzied child who had murdered her mother. The cornered woman who had stabbed Tyn through the chest. She drew upon the part of her that hated the way everyone assumed she was so nice, so sweet. The part of her that hated being described as diverting or clever.

     

  6. 2 hours ago, A Dopey Spren said:

    Now, Nightblood is a pretty badass sword, with his sense of humour and intent to eradicate evil in whichever fashionable way possible. 

     

    Love this thread, but here are you maybe referring more to the comic relief elements that Nightblood brings? I've never gotten the impression that Nightblood possesses anything close to a sense of humor (along with other subtle/nuanced "human" qualities). This is a big part of what makes Nightblood such a frightening entity, it doesn't seem to know how to behave like anything other than something between an over-eager puppy and a single minded child.

  7. 10 hours ago, Sprendiferous said:

    There really is a lot to like about Jasnah, she's brilliant, an obvious feminist figure, badass, eminently competent. However she really sucks at people. She's been misjudging people and treating them poorly since her first appearance. She's not cruel, or malicious; she's simply incredibly pragmatic and doesn't consider people's feelings (including her own) to be particularly important compared to what must be done

    Herein lies the crux of Jasnah's character and what I believe to be the core tenet of the Elsecallers. An aspiration towards pure logic and pragmatism. Does this make her a little distasteful at times? Yes. Does is also make her the single most dangerous person on Roshar? Probably. 

    I see where you're coming from with this opinion of Jasnah's character, but I think that her appearance of cold logic/reason are quite clearly revealed to be a defensive veneer that she puts up. Two scenes in particular in Oathbringer make it clear that Jasnah is just as compassionate and vulnerable as any other character in the book: the first is her spanreed/IRC chat session with her scholar friends, and the second is when she tracks down Renarin during the battle at Thaylen City. The thing about Jasnah is that she does not, in fact, just do "what must be done". She explicitly does the opposite with Renarin. 

    We don't currently know a whole lot about Jasnah's backstory, but there have been clear hints that she suffered some sort of severe trauma. I would guess that the public face that Jasnah wears in her current state is very much the result of coping with trauma, possibly abuse. 

    To your argument that her character is the core tenet of the Elsecallers, i.e. aspiring toward pure logic and pragmatism, I just had a new thought about how to interpret the various "core tenets" or archetypal Radiant personalities. It may actually make more sense if these archetypal personality traits of the various orders of KR are really more about the coping mechanisms that broken people use to manage their trauma. Shallan, for example, handles her trauma with lies and self-deception. Jasnah handles it by imposing upon herself a strict logical code of thought. Lift copes by aggressively empathizing with the downtrodden and disadvantaged and pushing back against opportunities to live a life of luxury and privilege. Kaladin is haunted by the friends and companions he's lost, and he copes by finding new groups/friends to fight for and try to help survive. I'm literally just thinking of these as I type them now, but I think it makes much more sense to think about the archetypal Radiant traits/tropes as differences in coping mechanisms rather than fundamental differences in character.

  8. 6 hours ago, RShara said:

    I love that she's so intelligent and confident and unapologetic for it.  Can't wait to read her viewpoint novel.  So many intelligent people are embarrassed, faux-humble, or apologetic for their intelligence, particularly when it's a woman.  It's refreshing to see someone who is proud of her intelligence while recognizing her faults without being embarrassed about them.

    Could not agree with this more. Jasnah is a kind of strong female protagonist that very rarely appears in fantasy.

    I also loved the Thaylen City battle where she is revealed to be an absolute BAMF.

  9. On 11/19/2017 at 7:12 AM, Nasicus said:

    I feel like I'm a bad person.

    Why? Because when the street boy died it was the first time since the first book that I was happy with a Shallan chapter.

    I just don't like her or didn't (well probably still don't). Everything no matter what she wanted to do alwas succeeded, no matter how stupid, how new the experience (stabbing herself through the hand, arrow in the head, etc etc etc). She could do anything. ANYTHING. Compared to other characters who always have fallbacks (for example: WHY GOD BRANDON WHY MUST KALADIN HAVE ANOTHER BREAKDOWN? HE DOESNT DESERVE IT!). For me it feels like this scene was the firs time she failed. Hopefully now she also gets herself together (well she probably will, thanks to Wit) and becomes a a more likeable character.... I don't know if I will ever grow back to liking her, as I once did somewhere i the first book.

    Do you guys like her???

    Apart from dead I'm really sad that Elhokar had to die...this will only bring Kaladin even MORE to desperation and grievance :( Though I guess he will be the first to swear the fourth ideal since in chapter 86 the record from a gem is: [...]Everyone says I will swear the Fourth Ideal soon, and in so doing, earn my armor. I simply don't think that I can. Am I not supposed to want to help people?[..]. I guess Kaladin will soon be in this "state" because he cannot (could not) decide which people to help.

    Personally I think Shallan might be the best, most fully realized character that Brandon has ever created. It took me a while to warm up to her, but by the end of WoR I think she had cemented herself as SA's strongest character. I feel Kaladin has trended in the opposite direction, in that he feels more and more one dimensional as I read more of the SA. 

  10. On 11/14/2017 at 3:52 PM, Kered said:

    I don't think we could've asked for a better introduction to Odium. Many of us had the notion that while he may not be incoherently angry, he would at least appear to sometimes have sudden mood shifts. 

    Nope. 

     

    Just a kind old man, lulling Dalinar out of his preconceived notions and sounding rational, then BOOM. Eternal hate fire. Then he basically says "Ops, my b D-man, accidentally let the tiger off the leash". 

     

    Odium is going to be the villain we all hoped for. Cool, calm, collected and absolutely to the core, evil.   


     

    I just want to say that I love this summary of the Odium meeting. Is it too early to say that Odium is the true Chris Brown of Shards?

  11. It seems that Kaladin's time among the Parsh-folk is a natural follow-up to his experiences with Rlain in WoR. Looking at the bigger picture, I think Kaladin's part 1 arc is another major step along the path to drawing non-traditional (at least relative to much of the "common wisdom" we've been presented with) battle lines in the larger Stormlight Archive story arc. I think we're going to see groups of Parsh-folk peeling off from the void-controlled ranks, and just as we're going to have some major human factions fighting against our protagonists.

  12. 4 minutes ago, Isaiah Zayth said:

    In terms of plot development, yes. In terms of taking away from the fact that Jasnah is back... I think it would be a little over the top. :P

    Great point. This is probably the most likely situation, but a guy can dream.

    I agree that Jasnah is the likely only new arrival, mainly because Adolin says "someone" just arrived at the tower, which is singular. It makes sense that Jasnah's family would be motivated to stick close to her now upon learning that she's alive.

  13. This a quick question following up on Khriss' intro to the Scadrian system in Arcanum Unbound. Specifically, she writes that Scadrial is one of two places in the Cosmere where humankind does not predate the arrival of shards. Do we know what the other places is? Is the second such place just Silverlight, or is there a second planet where humanity arrived with its shard(s)?

  14. 3 hours ago, Cowmanthethird said:

    I agree that it seems like a lot of characters are taking a darker path than in previous books, I wouldn't personally include Kaladin though (at least not yet). Unless he actually helps the parshmen attack some humans or something, I think he's doing the right thing by trying to help them.

    I agree completely; I wouldn't consider Kaladin's story so far to be dark at all, quite the opposite really. In happy contrast to the first two books, Kaladin has been relatively emotionally stable, and seems to be following a laudable moral compass with the Parsh-people (i.e., not making a blanket assumption that an entire race are the "bad guys" without being presented with any evidence to support that idea).

  15. 8 minutes ago, bo.montier said:

    IT seems more to me like Syl is saying that listeners cannot form nahel bonds, not that there is no spren bond. Trusting Syl's intuition about the spren is entirely different from thinking she is an absolute source of knowledge. She seems to see to the core of things and understand the essence, even if the details are off. 

     

    I agree that's what she's saying, but I think the consensus is that it is not true that Listeners cannot for nahel bonds, i.e., the preponderance of the evidence supports the idea that Listeners can form nahel bonds. On this topic there are a few relevant comments from Brandon:

    Q:  Is Eshonai going to be a Radiant?
    A:  In the past, parshmen/Parshendi were not allowed to become KR.  However, what I said might imply that that could change.  But no promises.

    and 

    Q:  Is it possible for a Parshendi to become a KR?
    A:  In the past, no. Let's say this, in-world everybody would tell you no.

    These two WoBs clearly and strongly imply (in one case, explicitly) that there is no fundamental barrier to Parshendi forming Nahel bonds, but rather that this is something that has never happened in the past. It's not clear who/what was doing the "allowing" in reference to "In the past, Parshendi were not allowed to become KR", but clearly it's a possibility that's on the table, which means that it absolutely is a thing that *can happen*. 

    As this relates to Syl as a source of knowledge, my point is that she is no more reliable that any other in-world character, which is to say that she can be misinformed, or believe a thing to be true based on faulty logic/reasoning. Such faulty reasoning would include the fallacy of assuming that something that has never happened before cannot happen. 

  16. 11 hours ago, Justin said:

    Didn't Syl specifically say that parshem cannot have a Nahel bond, when she and Kaladin where talking about the morality of killing a bunch or parshmen (either at the beginning of WoR or the end of Wok). He said something along the lines of "what if there was a parshman bonded to his own honorspren who saw me killing his companions" and Syl responds "Parshmen can't bond with spren".

    If Syl was not misinformed, this probably rules out any normal-spren and Eshoani Nahel bond. 

    The yellow spren did not seem corrupted, or hatefull and historically voidspren have been red and lightning bolty. I would rule that Syl might be wrong about what type of spren it was, but it seems like a mini peice of honor would be able to tell the difference between another little piece of Honor, and a little piece of Honor's sworn enemy.

    I think it's becoming clear that we cannot consider Syl as an absolute source of knowledge. She knows and remembers some things, but even some of what she remembers could easily be incorrect if it was based on misinformation or misunderstanding. As an example, Syl states outright that Listeners cannot becoming surgebinders (WoR Chapter 44, in conversation w/ Kaladin), which lines up perfectly what what Brandon has implied is an in-world misconception (and one that I think we all are coming to agree is likely dead wrong).

    The Shin-like appearance of the yellow spren makes sense in the context of her being very old, as the Shin are likely the oldest human population on Roshar (based on their language having Dawnchant origins, which is only true of the Listener, Shin, and Horneater languages). 

  17. 8 hours ago, vividox said:

    The second novelette is from the POV of a character that hasn't had any viewpoints yet. From the second reddit update:

    "Each volume, then, has a complete trilogy's worth of arcs and climaxes for the primary characters (Kaladin, Shallan, Dalinar) while also having a self-contained flashback sequence, at least one secondary novelette about a character that hasn't had viewpoints so far, and a related short story collection."

    In re-reading, that actually kind of reads like the short story collection and the secondary novelette are related to one another. Since the short story collection appears to be about the Parshendi, could the secondary novelette be about Venli? Or maybe even a flashback to Klade?

    Oooo that's interesting. So I guess the "no-viewpoints-character so far" information argues for Moash as one of the novelette or short story arc (unless I'm forgetting a PoV from him?). If Moash is one then I wonder who would be the PoV for the related novelette/short story arc. Taravangian is really the only person that makes much sense to me, unless it's some other entirely new person related to the Diagram-ists.

    Mostly I find myself rooting for a decent amount of Jasnah PoV time in Oathbringer. That and a Jasnah+Kaladin cross-country trip ending in Kholinar.

  18. 9 minutes ago, KidWayne said:

    @treblkickd OK, just to play devil's advocate here, what if the revocation of personal freedom was a side effect instead of the intended result?

     

    Given the horrific nature of what was done to the parshmen, I would argue that the right thing to do in this scenario would be to try to find a way to reverse the enslavement. If you have complete power over an entire race of sentient people then I would argue that the "right" course of action is never to enslave them and call it a day. The bare minimum morally defensible choice would be enslavement followed by working to rehabilitate safely. It is obvious that wasn't the path that Roshar's human population took.

    Stepping back slightly, the early release chapters, thus far, have leaned heavily on the theme that it is dead wrong to attempt to draw distinct lines between "good vs evil" groups based on racial criteria in Roshar. It's not a terribly complex or controversial idea, but in the context of fantasy literature it does end up being a little subversive (Sanderson's not he first fantasy author to play around with this idea, of course). Just looking at the OB chapters released so far, it has already been made clear that the Parsh-people (-men/-endi/did we decide on a term?) are "people", just like the humans. It's also been made clear that the Parsh-* do not have a monopoly on being subject to corruption by Odium (see, e.g., the Thrill). I mean, we're getting flashback chapters every week that reveal that Dalinar was a horrible person, potentially sociopathic, and certainly a murderer. The fact that his actions were essentially considered "par for the course" in Alethkar is quite damning for the human population there (or at least those with authority).

    One of the things I find myself struggling with while reading Oathbringer, in fact, is that I don't see how I can consider Dalinar much of a true hero or protagonist; his best case scenario might be some sort of redemption story arc. In this vein, it's darkly amusing that Dalinar is attempting to take up a leadership role in working to unite Roshar peacefully, while he seems completely oblivious to the fact that his own history/actions should pretty much disqualify him from any sort of peacemaking/diplomatic leadership role. Sure, we get to see current Dalinar PoVs that indicate his sincerity, but when you sit back and think about it there's literally no reason for any in-world person, outside of perhaps a few people closest to him, to trust Dalinar "the blackthorn" Kholin as a leader of men. Personally, I would love for a part of Dalinar's story arc to be the realization that he needs to take a back seat to others in the attempt to unite Roshar. Perhaps the best thing that he can do is to work to re-found the Knights Radiant, seeking out, supporting and training potential Radiants, and give up any authority over nations and armies (we've already seen the first step toward this, actually, w/ Elhokar's proclamation). Anyway, sorry to wander pretty far afield from the topic at hand. 

×
×
  • Create New...