Shatter He/Him Posted May 18 Posted May 18 (edited) Hey y'all. No idea if there was a space discussion. I decided to make one :3 I'll hand out a few questions to kickstart the discussion. How did you first get into astronomy or space science, and what’s your favourite topic in space science right now, and why? For me personally, I had a placemat which had the solar system on it. One thing led to another, and I'm a very big space nerd now. My fave topic rn is star formation and the formation of solar systems. Edited May 18 by Shatter 1
CoderDrag0n8 He/They Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 hour ago, Shatter said: Hey y'all. No idea if there was a space discussion. I decided to make one :3 I'll hand out a few questions to kickstart the discussion. How did you first get into astronomy or space science, and what’s your favourite topic in space science right now, and why? For me personally, I had a placemat which had the solar system on it. One thing led to another, and I'm a very big space nerd now. My fave topic rn is star formation and the formation of solar systems. Honestly I have no idea how I got into this. But I do love space. Space is prob my fav part, hands down.
Shatter He/Him Posted May 19 Author Posted May 19 1 hour ago, CoderDrag0n8 said: Honestly I have no idea how I got into this. But I do love space. Space is prob my fav part, hands down. nahhhh. space is your fave part? Inconceivable! lol I'm a big nerd about space. oo I should mention @Through The Living Glass
CoderDrag0n8 He/They Posted May 19 Posted May 19 5 minutes ago, Shatter said: nahhhh. space is your fave part? Inconceivable! lol I'm a big nerd about space. oo I should mention @Through The Living Glass Mmm I don't think Glass has been on recently. You can check her profile, I think someone posted abt it.
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 52 minutes ago, CoderDrag0n8 said: Mmm I don't think Glass has been on recently. You can check her profile, I think someone posted abt it. Mmm I think she was on 3 hours ago 4 hours ago, Shatter said: Hey y'all. No idea if there was a space discussion. I decided to make one :3 I'll hand out a few questions to kickstart the discussion. How did you first get into astronomy or space science, and what’s your favourite topic in space science right now, and why? For me personally, I had a placemat which had the solar system on it. One thing led to another, and I'm a very big space nerd now. My fave topic rn is star formation and the formation of solar systems. My family has connections with NASA and stuff, and I recently took an astronomy class. Space is cool
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 7 hours ago, Shatter said: Hey y'all. No idea if there was a space discussion. I decided to make one :3 I'll hand out a few questions to kickstart the discussion. How did you first get into astronomy or space science, and what’s your favourite topic in space science right now, and why? For me personally, I had a placemat which had the solar system on it. One thing led to another, and I'm a very big space nerd now. My fave topic rn is star formation and the formation of solar systems. How I got into space... Well, I don't remember exactly, but I learnt the names of the planets when I was 6, so I guess it started with that My favourite part of space currently is cosmology: the history and future of the larger universe
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 (edited) Let's jumpstart this discussion (That's a joke, I actually hate the Pluto should be a planet argument) Edited May 19 by Through the Living Hopper
Shatter He/Him Posted May 19 Author Posted May 19 12 hours ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Mmm I think she was on 3 hours ago My family has connections with NASA and stuff, and I recently took an astronomy class. Space is cool same. I have a cousin who was in training to be an astronaut. 2 hours ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Let's jumpstart this discussion (That's a joke, I actually hate the Pluto should be a planet argument) agreed. Pluto is not a planet. 8 hours ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: How I got into space... Well, I don't remember exactly, but I learnt the names of the planets when I was 6, so I guess it started with that My favourite part of space currently is cosmology: the history and future of the larger universe cosmology do be interesting
Pathfinder Posted May 19 Posted May 19 I mentioned this in another thread, but I found what parsecs actually are very interesting. The Startalk episode explains it far better than I will, but I will try to sum it up. Basically choose an object in front of you (tv, painting, couch, etc). Pick a hand (right or left, doesn’t matter), raise it up in front of you with your thumb up. Close one eye (right or left), and position the thumb so it covers the view of the object. Then close the opened eye, and open the closed eye. The perspective of where the thumb is shifts. If you measure the distance between your eyes, and measure the shift in perspective of the object when compared to your thumb, you can calculate the angles, and then determine how far you are from the object. That is how they calculated how far stars were from earth. Now this only works to a certain distance, and there are better tools now, but I found that was really cool.
Shatter He/Him Posted May 19 Author Posted May 19 29 minutes ago, Pathfinder said: I mentioned this in another thread, but I found what parsecs actually are very interesting. The Startalk episode explains it far better than I will, but I will try to sum it up. Basically choose an object in front of you (tv, painting, couch, etc). Pick a hand (right or left, doesn’t matter), raise it up in front of you with your thumb up. Close one eye (right or left), and position the thumb so it covers the view of the object. Then close the opened eye, and open the closed eye. The perspective of where the thumb is shifts. If you measure the distance between your eyes, and measure the shift in perspective of the object when compared to your thumb, you can calculate the angles, and then determine how far you are from the object. That is how they calculated how far stars were from earth. Now this only works to a certain distance, and there are better tools now, but I found that was really cool. parallax? (a parsec is a measurement of distance) Yeah. I believe the satellite Gaia used this technique to calculate the distance of over 1 billion astronomical objects. really cool stuff there. we got to measure stars up to 30,000 ly away from us. Here's a map Gaia made. absolutely insane. 1
Pathfinder Posted May 19 Posted May 19 8 minutes ago, Shatter said: parallax? (a parsec is a measurement of distance) Yeah. I believe the satellite Gaia used this technique to calculate the distance of over 1 billion astronomical objects. really cool stuff there. we got to measure stars up to 30,000 ly away from us. Here's a map Gaia made. absolutely insane. Yep, I was explaining the process that would get the measurement. Star Wars sadly messed up the general understanding of it to be how fast a distance was traveled (made the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs). When 12 parsecs would be the distance measured period.
Shatter He/Him Posted May 19 Author Posted May 19 5 minutes ago, Pathfinder said: Yep, I was explaining the process that would get the measurement. Star Wars sadly messed up the general understanding of it to be how fast a distance was traveled (made the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs). When 12 parsecs would be the distance measured period. ohhh. yeah. You use the parallax to measure distance. I prefer lightyears to parsecs.
Ink and Embers Any pronouns Posted May 19 Posted May 19 17 hours ago, Shatter said: Hey y'all. No idea if there was a space discussion. I decided to make one :3 I'll hand out a few questions to kickstart the discussion. How did you first get into astronomy or space science, and what’s your favourite topic in space science right now, and why? For me personally, I had a placemat which had the solar system on it. One thing led to another, and I'm a very big space nerd now. My fave topic rn is star formation and the formation of solar systems. I used to have a poster of the solar system when I was younger, then I hyperfixated on it for a couple of years when I was 11ish, so while I don't know as much as I used to, I still find it very cool. My favourite topic is the potential existence of aliens
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 5 hours ago, Pathfinder said: Yep, I was explaining the process that would get the measurement. Star Wars sadly messed up the general understanding of it to be how fast a distance was traveled (made the Kessel run in less than 12 parsecs). When 12 parsecs would be the distance measured period. You can interpret Han Solo's comment as meaning he went closer to potential dangers so that the run was shorter.
Akimikoisthecutest Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Well it was actually 12.9 parsecs, but 12 sounds more impressive than 13...
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 8 hours ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Let's jumpstart this discussion (That's a joke, I actually hate the Pluto should be a planet argument) Yup, this argument annoys me greatly. Now, I'd like to build on what I said in the aliens thread: I think the planet definition should change, though not to include Pluto I think it should be: A certain mass threshold is cleared (something around 10^23 kg) It orbits a star This way, there can be no ambiguity on whether something has reached hydrostatic equilibrium, and what exactly counts as a 'nearly round' shape There can also be no debate around whether a planet's orbit is cleared; all planets except Mercury have Trojan asteroids in their orbits. And as a final perk, exoplanets actually count with this one
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 7 minutes ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: I think it should be: A certain mass threshold is cleared (something around 10^23 kg) It orbits a star This way, there can be no ambiguity on whether something has reached hydrostatic equilibrium, and what exactly counts as a 'nearly round' shape The problem is that changing scientific terms, even for good reason, causes huge issues with old instructional and old ways of thinking.
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 Just now, Through the Living Hopper said: The problem is that changing scientific terms, even for good reason, causes huge issues with old instructional and old ways of thinking. Well yes, but it happened when Pluto was demoted, and Ceres and some asteroids before that It can happen
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 minute ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: Well yes, but it happened when Pluto was demoted, and Ceres and some asteroids before that It can happen But that was a long time ago, and then there was no official definition for planet (as a result, you can argue that Pluto never actually was a planet).
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 minute ago, Through the Living Hopper said: But that was a long time ago, and then there was no official definition for planet (as a result, you can argue that Pluto never actually was a planet). True But I think it can work, eventually; the planets in our solar system aren't changing, it just makes things more consistent and adds exoplanets.
CoderDrag0n8 He/They Posted May 19 Posted May 19 1 hour ago, Through the Living Hopper said: But that was a long time ago, and then there was no official definition for planet (as a result, you can argue that Pluto never actually was a planet). Than what if we call them super planets? There is currently no official definition for a super planet.
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 20 Posted May 20 1 hour ago, CoderDrag0n8 said: Than what if we call them super planets? There is currently no official definition for a super planet. Because a short name is better than a long one
CoderDrag0n8 He/They Posted May 20 Posted May 20 9 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Because a short name is better than a long one Than a pla Plas are way better than planets by your definition, it is better. 1
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted May 20 Posted May 20 1 hour ago, CoderDrag0n8 said: Than a pla Plas are way better than planets by your definition, it is better. It was supposed to be a joke because there are no short names in astronomy other than "Sol" and "Luna." (And "Mars")
Pathfinder Posted May 20 Posted May 20 18 hours ago, Through the Living Hopper said: You can interpret Han Solo's comment as meaning he went closer to potential dangers so that the run was shorter. I mean sure? I don’t really care about Star Wars enough to interpret his intent versus what he said. Just for however long, the concept was misunderstood. I just thought how they went about calculating the distances to stars once upon a time very interesting because you can literally emulate it with your own eyes and a thumb. Retcons can retcon lol.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now