Malim

I hope it works out, and I wish nothing but the best for you.

I am definitely not a teenager anymore, so if you will forgive an oldster, I will give you the same advice I give my teenage daughters: 

13 hours ago, Chinkoln said:

So one way or another, just be yourself. Unless they are a total jerk, they will be fine texting with you no matter what

This.  Chinkoln said it perfectly.  Anybody worth your time will respect you for who you are.  If they don't, they're not worthy of your crush.  The teenage years are tough.  We all either are in them, or went through them.  It is hard to figure out the line between being "clingy" and being social.  The secret is that I guarantee your crush has the same difficulty.

If you are yourself, and he responds with interest, then text, and text as often as you want.  If he doesn't, then take it as a sign that he's not for you.  It's hard, but being true to yourself is the best way, not only for younger people, but for old fogies like me.

Good luck

Shallan is secretly a brunette.  This overarching lie attracted Testament, who not only felt an attraction to the untruth, but was also Shadesmar's best stylist.  The truth spoken addressed the danger that the dyes and chemicals used could make Shallan's hair fall out.  She broke that truth when in a fit of rage, she started wearing a wig.

Spoilered for size.

There are in fact female Inquisitors that we have seen on screen, it just wasn't very noticeable.  Of course this is after TLR had gone beyond.

Quote

Chaos (paraphrased)

Does being female alter the spiritual overlays on a person, so that a Hemalurgically imbued spike would need to be placed differently than in a male body?

Brandon Sanderson (paraphrased)

No. In fact, there are female inquisitors in the huge fight when Vin goes blasting through them, but he felt like bringing that out would have been distracting.

Ancient 17S Q&A (May 1, 2010)

Any Nahel bond: Navi with benefits.

My headcanon is that it's the point where the Spiritual Realm touches the Cognitive.  In Mistborn, it seems to be the point that souls are drawn towards, and in Shadesmar it draws light and shadows towards it.

No real evidence for this, but it's my crackpot theory.

Ok.  I told you in the previous thread that I would explain why I hate Moash as a person after you read RoW, so here goes.  Much of this has been touched on by other posters, but at the risk of repeating, I owe you an explanation.

I don't hate Moash for killing Elhokar or Teft, or Phendorana for that matter.  All of them were valid military targets at the time of their demise.  While I personally hate that these things happened, (Phendorana hit me especially hard for some reason, even more than Teft) I can't hate Moash on a visceral level for them.  It is war.  In war you may be called upon to kill or maim people you respect.  (Not going to judge the larger morality of war here, but as long as war is a fact, the above is too.)  I don't care about "kicking" Gavinor, as frankly I didn't read it that way, but more as moving him out of the way.

I hate Moash because of his thought process.  Forget Elhokar.  He had relatively valid, if misguided, personal reasons for doing so.  He tried to talk Kaladin into killing himself, not because he wanted to "save him," but because he didn't want someone alive who could prove him wrong.  This is borne out by his actions in Urithiru.  When Kaladin almost went to Odium, Moash could have killed him to save him.  He didn't, instead he tried to make it happen.  He killed Teft simply to prove to himself that he could do so without regret.  When he did, he felt vindicated.

Yes, you can say that he was under Odium's influence, but the kicker is the vision he had in Hearthstone when Renarin used Lightweaving on him to show him his "perfect" self.  When confronted with this, Moash didn't show remorse, or sadness, or regret.  Instead his first act was to yell out that "No, you said you would take my pain!"  

Compare that to Lin Davar, who was also under Odium's thumb, but in a few moments of clarity did show some remorse and sorrow.  (I'm thinking of the flashback scene in WoR where he talks to Shallan about how he is sorry that things have become the way they are.  The carnival scene with Hoid I think?)

Yes, I know that Moash is an addict in many ways, and that this sickness does color his thoughts.  But I also have a lot of personal experience with addiction (that I won't go into here) and in my experience, even the worst addicts have fleeting moments of regret and remorse.  Moash doesn't.  His only regret is that he still has the capability to feel, and even that is fleeting and something he thinks he has conquered by killing Teft.  He says as much.

Now maybe he is still in the first stages of addiction, where the whole point, at least in my experience, is to rid yourself of feeling, but it has been a year.  He either is stuck in the first stage, which I doubt, or he is choosing to be who he is.  It is that choice that I hate.  It is that choice that I can not forgive.  That is why I hate Moash on a personal level.

Basically, I don't hate the addiction, if that is what it is.  I don't hate the history or feelings that led to that addiction.  I don't even hate the actions other than on a character or narrative driven level.  I hate the choices.  I hate the reasons.  I hate the continued doubling down even when (magically induced or not) absolute clarity is given to Moash.  I hate Moash because he could be better.  He could be redeemed.  I hate Moash simply because he never will be redeemed, and not because it would be impossible, but because he never will take the first step.  Not because of addiction, or force, or confusion, but because even in his moments of clarity, he doesn't want to.  That shows his true character, and to me that is unforgivable.

On 7/4/2021 at 1:42 PM, mathiau said:

 I think there was also an half-Maia half-elf somewhere that might work

Did Melian and Thingol have any children?  That would work.

Sorry for the continued hijack of the topic.  I second the question about a dedicated Legendarium thread.

When you're out with friends and order a Goldschlagger even though you hate it just in case you can burn the flakes...

There is something else I wonder.  In the contract between Odium and Taravangian, it was essentially being enforced by Cultivation, even though she wasn't a party to it.  How?  As Rayse said, violating the contract would leave him open to an attack from her, and it is heavily implied that she would not pass up the opportunity.  That seems to be moot now since Cultivation basically placed Taravangian into Odium, or at least started the events that led to that happening.  She seems quite content with the current state of affairs.

From Harmony's letter, it seems that no other Shard either wants to, or currently can, attack Odium.  There is no enforcer.  I think that if Taravangian wanted to break that agreement, he could probably do so with immunity, at least in the short term.  The only question in my mind is why he would want to.  It costs him nothing to keep it, and as an individual, he has no reason that I can see to break it.

17 hours ago, Honorless said:

Oh wow, sounds like Odium might not have been able to manifest himself directly on Roshar yet but he was paying attention to certain events.

I wonder... does a tiny bit of Connection form between the observer and the observed? It sounds very plausible to me that it does. Because that might be one explanation of how the spren can feel him.

Didn't we see this same thing with Dalinar?  When he was practicing with his powers on his soldiers, didn't he see a connection line between himself and the foot soldier he was practicing on?  This could be the link between commander and subordinate, but could it also be the link between observer and the one being observed? 

There is a principle in science that by observing something, you inherently change it.  (Can't remember the name of the principle offhand.)  We have seen something similar with observed Flame Spren in the Interludes.  As pieces of a Shard, it could be that both Syl and Pattern are picking up on that Connection.

Have we seen any other instances of this Connection at play in Dalinar's POV? 

I honestly dont know how to reply to this given where you are in the series.  At the end of OB, I was exactly where the OP is.  I didn't like Moash's actions, but I did feel that they were justified in a very real sense.  I felt sympathy for his actions and feelings.  I  felt that his logic was fairly rational, if misguided.  In any sense, he was no worse than Dalinar or Szeth.

Then RoW.  I don't even want to say why my opinion changed, because I want  @Jash to go into it clean, but please ping me when you have read it, because I would love to go in depth with you as to my reasons.

Accept that you were hurt, but don't accept that you deserved it.

-Wit to Shallan (paraphrased)

*edit*  And I see that Realmatic Shadow beat me to it.

Not sure if this is new or not, but all three issues of the graphic novel just popped up on my Kindle Unlimited feed as free downloads if you are a member.  I'm pretty sure they were just added to that service as before I'd only seen in the regular Kindle Store.  Just thought I'd throw that out there for anyone who hasn't read them yet.

Honestly, I wonder if this line of thought had something to do with the Recreance.  We know that there was heavy fighting at the time, and it is quite conceivable that the idea of a complete genocide had been floated by some of the more Machiavellian orders.

Maybe the strike at BAM was a middle ground option, and when, or if, it didn't come off quite as planned, the genocide option gained more ground.  I can see a scenario that has Honor raving about the destruction Surges can cause, coupled with a plan to use those Surges to go full on Nazi Germani being a breaking point for many of the orders.  After all, it is one thing to armchair talk about killing everyone who might oppose you, regardless of the morality of such an option, and another to actually implement that plan.

I think this is an interesting theory.  It would also fit in with what Syl said about Honorspren hunting other spren in the Cognitive Realm.  Axies could be doing the same thing, but more of the Rosharan equivalent of a photo safari, rather than a hunt.

To take this farther, it makes me wonder about the Natans.  They are human, but they have blue skin.  Could they also have Spren blood at some point in their past?  Maybe the Siah Aimians were the Spren that became physical, and the Natans are the result of pairings between these physical Spren and humans.  Do we know if their shadows point the wrong way as well?

This is a cool concept, but I think it has one big flaw.  Everytime we see conjoined gemstones, they are all conjoined together.  For example, the First Bridge uses a large number of conjoined gemstones in the fabrial housings to minimize stress on each individual gem.  To change the conjoinment, they have to be switched off and reconjoined to a different set.  We also see this in Kaladin's flight glove.  He has to switch the conjoinment everytime one of the pendulums reaches the bottom.

For a machine gun mechanism to work, you would need something that rapidly shifts the conjoinment to the next round of ammo.  It's possible, I suppose, but have we seen anything that works automatically like that?  Otherwise, it would be more of a shotgun effect, not a rapid fire.

I wonder if it has anything to do with the rules of engagement that seem to be in place between the Heavenly Ones and the Windrunners.  They seem to avoid anything that gives an unfair advantage in their fights i.e: only fighting one on one, not targeting the wounded or noncombatants, etc.  Since none of the Windrunners have Plate at the battle, and Nale is bound by oath to follow the rules of the Fused, maybe he feels bound not to use Shardplate until it is used against him.

It's a stretch, I know, and Skybreakers are not Windrunners, but I think that might be part of why he didn't summon it.

On 11/16/2020 at 10:42 AM, Trutharchivist said:

I don't know anything about the wingspan that should make flying possible, but I've heard of a book called Flight of Dragons that is about it's physical possibility. It's probably not really all that much scientific, but it's still interesting.

I hope this isn't considered a necro, but I have read Flight of Dragons (it actually was one of my favorite movies as a kid, and the book was one of the first fantasy novels I read.)  How it is explained there is that Dragons eat limestone which interacts with stomach acid to produce hydrogen which then helps with lift, and also is the source of their fire.  Interestingly, in this system, the more fire breathing they do, the less they are able to fly.

Yes there is some hand waving with the involved science, but it is a neat way to get around the wing size issue.  Interestingly, in the cartoon, Dragons have more rounded body shapes to account for the hydrogen fill, especially when they are getting ready for take off.

I'm agnostic in the fullest sense of the word.  The term basically comes from the Greek "gnosis" which means knowledge, prefix "a" meaning without.  In its purest form it simply means that this particular knowledge is truly beyond our understanding.

We are limited to a set point in space for a limited period of time.  We are finite.  "God" or "The Universe" or "The Multiverse" or whatever term you like, is by definition infinite, therefore there is much more beyond our capability of understanding than there is within it.  To say definitely that there is or is not a God, is therefore not something we can claim to know, at least in my opinion.

I choose to put my faith in observable and repeatable science.  Not necessarily as a sole provider of fact, but because it is the way than we as finite beings can bring more of the unknowable into our realm of understanding.  I fully accept that there are things that science can never explain, and that there are certain fields, for example, human interactions, desires, and expressions that are completely outside of science, but are just as valid.

All of that said, I believe strongly that people can have faith or not in whatever spirituality they choose, as long as it is not inherently harmful to others, and I will defend them for having it.  After all, I am agnostic, I am without knowledge.  No one, or anyone, may be more close to truth than I.

On 1/27/2021 at 8:45 PM, KSub said:

Excellent, so we agree!

I can't figure out what the fourth category would be though. Any thoughts?

 

Possibly Build?  It has some of the same connotations as create, but it would be creating something new from what already is there.  It also could tie into Change.  It could hint at a greater division of two:

Build and Change

Ruin and ? (Can't think of anything offhand)

Note, this level is much more meta as Change and Ruin are just as aligned.  Maybe the four as pieces of a whole share a larger Intent?

I quite like it, though I hope there is more.  Please continue if you feel like it.

I'm not sure that I would include Mercy in the Survive group as by some definitions it is considered merciful to end a life that is suffering.  Also (minor shard spoilers)

It could fit.  Take the Change command from the Dawnshard.  I can see at least four different broad intents behind this.

1:  Change Yourself.  This could be physical, mental, spiritual, or some combination.  Note an Intent to change yourself for the worse would still fit the command.  Maybe Honor?

2:  Change Others.  Same as above, but focused on a different individual than yourself.  Domination?

3:  Change the World.  Work to change the entire Shardworld into something else.  Interestingly, this could apply to Odium, as that Shard wants to remake Roshar into a new form.

4:  Change.  It's purest Intent.  Growth, aging, evolution.  Cultivation?

Just my two cents.  The Shards of course are complete guesses, and I know that there are others here who could make better ones.