Jump to content

Szeth Pancakes

Members
  • Posts

    2371
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    18

Everything posted by Szeth Pancakes

  1. wOW that’s a lot of votes. Thanks for the summary, Drake The problem with this game is that I legitimately have no hard suspicions. I think I missed somewhere why everyone is voting out TUO, and no one else is raising any red flags. Except maybe Tani for being kinda abrasive, but I mean… it’s Tani. Y’know.
  2. I am alive! I have the time to read through the thread, but not the enthusiasm. If someone could do a quick thread summary, that would be nice, but I could just suck it up and read it.
  3. I feel you Ok… in that situation, I’d probably try to start a train, but your reasoning does seem village-y, or at least not elim-y. * On another note, I am not reading Mat village anymore. I did tell him before this game started about his tendency towards abrasiveness when he is an elim. My best guess for an elim team right now would be Striker/Elandera/Mat/+2 - with the +2 possibly including Archer.
  4. I feel like the more inactive I am, the more people are suspicious of me I feel like Striker, Elandera, and Mat are only voting within themselves, with one notable exception. I’m still very suspicious of Striker based on his actions D1, and I just feel like my suspicions are getting stronger. This post especially reads very strangely to me. The statement about not wanting to have one Worker Leader the entire game feels like it goes against the village wincon. Can you (Striker) tell me a reason why having multiple different WL’s during the game is actually helpful? And “Oh, I just don’t want to feel like one person is hogging it” doesn’t count. Plus, I don’t see the reasoning for voting Elandera. Is it just because they support your suspicions of me? The bottom paragraph is ok, but I could see a Mat/Striker e/e situation here.
  5. Well hello everyone. Apologies about the no-vote yesterday - for some reason, I thought I had already voted.
  6. Something very strange was going on with Earl. He remembered being raised by his parents, but not their names. He remembered joining the Hyrule Castle guard, but he didn’t know why. He remembered that Keila was his friend, but had no recollection of any times they’d spent together. And there were strange little bugs following him wherever he went. He knew that this was bad, but not why it was bad. They were just bugs, right? So, he decided to investigate.
  7. It’s just, with so little else to go on, we should be looking at the people who are trying to get themselves Elected, and think about not voting for them. Instead, we should vote for people who have been saying less about their own Election, who are naturally more likely to be village. I know it’s a stretch, but it’s D1, and we need to shrink the pool of potential Elections somehow. I love autocorrect
  8. Ok - let’s see. If you mention voting for yourself, even if you’re explicitly saying not to, it makes people more likely to vote for you. It’s kind of like how mentioning upvotes in your post is more likely to get you upvoted. Mentioning voting reminds people that you can be voted for, and are more likely to make that connection when choosing somebody to vote for. Does that make sense? Sorry about the grammatical incoherence of my first explanation. On another note, rEADS! These are all very soft - a “mild” here would be a “very mild” later in the game. When doing VC’s, do not, I repeat, do not open the spoiler box.
  9. This feels like an elim move because drawing attention to the fact that this can happen, making people associate it with them. It’s like the thing where people who mention upvotes in their post are naturally going to get more upvotes than people who don’t. Maybe I’m overthinking things, but this feels like a viable elim strategy. Also, I really think upvotes are interesting, don’t you?
  10. I just wanted to say something, and that’s the only thing I could think of.
  11. Yes, plus the fact that he tried to coerce us out of it. That would be a risky play if he was an elim. Plus, it’s D1 and we need to start somewhere. I also should note that Archer seems kinda off to me right now - there’s less logical analysis coming out of him and more fluff. While I have only played one game with non-village Archer, this happened then too. I find this odd. Why would you want to RNG something if you could go off of reads instead? That’s almost as bad as RNG, but it’s not quite there. * Now that I think about it, Striker self-voting seems like an elim ploy to me. Mentioning voting on yourself is more likely to get people to think about voting on you. Now I’m not so sure about my Striker vote.
  12. I am alive! It’s unfortunate that Kas had to die too, but I guess that was to be expected. I have a feeling this is going to be a close game
  13. Well hello everyone! StrikerEZ This is almost definitely going to change, but I think I should get the ball rolling on this. Striker’s past two posts have seemed very village to me, and since we want to Elevate (or whatever it’s called) as many villagers as possible, well, yeah! Your village-iest read should probably go in red, and your second-village-iest read should go in purple. Unless I’m missing something. brb, I’m gonna go read the rules again Edit: Elected, not Elevated. I was close.
  14. Um… what did I miss? … I KNEW IT REEEEEEEEEEEEE IT WAS ILLWEI *does tiktok dance* … Ok, now that we have that out of the way, 3 new pages. In 3 hours. Lol Anyway, yeah. I don’t think I have anything else to say on this. Now, I have to go get a storming haircut. bye
  15. I honestly wasn’t thinking clearly. I had like 30 seconds to do something in the thread, and I was extra tired at the time. Edit: @Dannex please tell us :<
  16. You seemed more… abrasive the past few games I played with you.
  17. Hmmmmmmmmmmm… but do we know you’re village? jk, you seem very vil this time.
×
×
  • Create New...