Ripheus23

I realized, if you take, "Do X," and go to, "Why do X?" you can then define a specific do-X operator recursively (in erotetic logical space) as, "Ask why." This operator can then preface itself to infinity, as aleph-zero:

Why ask "why ask 'why ask ... why ask 'why do X?'"

X itself can take the value of the formula of supererogation, which at infinity is at aleph-zero magnitude. I think, though, inputting supererogation-X into the function takes the first infinity to the power of the second, so it gives a specific higher cardinality. It is easier to represent, in this case, starting with beth-zero and succeeding by transcension alone to beth-one, because beth-one is the Continuum even if it is not equal to aleph-one. So at any rate, the why-transet ++ the supererogation-transet = a deontic transet whose degree is beth-one, i.e. is a continuous transet. This fact is specified in the autoset, which is a unique transcendental number. I.e. it is one out of all the uncountably infinite numbers encoded into the Continuum, that is used to map to the beth-one why-set, and it is not the result of any selection function but free will (within the deontic transet in general).

This might not seem helpfully clear, but it should play a role in the explanation of romantic ideality, from the apex-staircase and the heart-operator relation (which is transfinally arithmetical, it turns out), alongside the nexus-heart and so on. (I've even identified "void numbers" that are negative counterparts of ghost numbers...) At least, that's the goal.