Jump to content

Ripheus23

Members
  • Posts

    1318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Ripheus23 last won the day on November 21 2018

Ripheus23 had the most liked content!

5 Followers

About Ripheus23

  • Birthday 07/15/1986

Profile Information

  • Member Title
    Aonspren
  • Location
    Wherever I ought to be
  • Interests
    Interesting things.

Ripheus23's Achievements

1.1k

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by Ripheus23

  1. Now, my theory goes off "space is never totally empty anywhere," but is this true of time? I was thinking it might be, but in the more exotic sense that there is never a period of time that is always empty. So, if an infinite linear tetrahelix is flowing horizontally while spinning, it will implicitly trace an infinite set of overlapping spheres (out perfectly from the linear horizon). So if all "space" was compacted in a possible cylinder at the edges of the tetrahelix, the flow of time could "fill up" all time over all intervals combined while leaving some regions temporarily(!) empty, timewise, so to say.

    But, the other idea I had was that the three logic functions that give rise to sigma-actuation, could be mapped to the front of the tetrahedron on the edge of a helix (even if there was an infinite helix, it might have an edge, as a ray, so to say), so that as it spun and moved horizontally, it would by this means compute the transequent order of modality, i.e. the +/- infinite sums, and the possibility/actually infinite sums (two for which direction is "read from"). And the quantity of sigma-actuation at each point would map to the angle of each of the infinite tetrahedra, so it would never repeat exactly, unless the entire system were folded into the fourth dimension of space and somehow transformed into a tetraplex or something (600-cell, otherwise to say!).

    [Note: using [] as possible and () as actual, and going from

    • () goes to []()
    • [] goes to ()[]
    • () goes to ()()
    • [] goes to [][]

    we could start with pure possibility, and get an infinite string of actuality bounded by pure possibility:

    1. []
    2. [][]
    3. []()[]
    4. []()()[]
    5. []()()()[]
    6. []()()()()[]
    7. []()() ... ()()[]

    So if we summed up this entire manifold, we could extract an infinite "amount" of ()-ity from []-ity, thus circumventing part of the problem of how there is something instead of nothing, so to say...

    But, at any rate, since the []/() alternations would be mapped to the different orientations of the tetrahelix, we can imagine an infinite succession of these alternations that is "not a rational fraction of the circle" traced by the spirals, as such, or whatever, so rather than following some preformed repeating sequence (just as in the synthesis of (7) above?), we would add in either []'s or ()'s, at whichever interval (from whichever intervals are available at each subsequent stage) was relevant(!).]

    NOW, though, I also had a weird and/or storyish idea, namely, let's say the Planck incident actually represents a "damaged" stage of reality, and the expansion of space is a recrystallization of a life-like manifold, i.e. what if the greater universe is "healing" and this is causing the continued, and accelerated, expansion of space? Granted, this depends on a complex para-metaphorical interpretation of the terms, to even be remotely possible: if the Planck incident resulted from a collision of particles in a pure time-verse, which left an objective vacuum in a (3-dimensional) time-space, and so the "essence of reality" (so to speak?) rushed in to fill the vacuum, like a liquid, and the strands of the liquid were these little "realitarian"(!) tetrahelix sigma-actuators...

    This would have to be relevant to one character in one story I came up with re: these quasi-physics lectures, to be sure...

    1. Ripheus23

      Ripheus23

      Anyway, let's have the tetrahedron at the edge of the tetrahelix ray, propelling itself through the time manifold by increasing the size of the tetrahelix (let's say, the edge-hedron undergoes Sierpinski action and the resultant net is strung out behind the pilot tetrahedron?). I.e. the pilot-hedron is displacing itself forward in time. Now, two time-waves collide. I have assumed that the "time-verse" contains particles of some sort, "kairons," and that in the time-verse, the statistics pertaining to the distribution of quantum numbers are randomized over the entire realm, so let's say every kairon has a speed, a direction, and a mass. So, when the waves collide, they convert their mass into spatial mass somehow, that is they have some index corresponding to what their mass yield is after collision. Now kairons aren't bound by general relativity so there could be ones traveling faster than 300,000 kilometers per second and equal in weight to 10-to-the-power-of-1500 solar masses, so we can assume the mass-energy-mass conversion of a collision incident involving kairons could encode enough spatially redistributed information to cover the 10^80-something protons we have, supposedly, for instance.

      Anyway, as per the rest of the theory so far, symmetry gives us equal matter and antimatter but the antileptons are deduced from a Planck-Kleinert structure with less actuation to its name than the common leptons (and vectrons, for that matter). So, all the quarks and antiquarks cancel out and eject their energy not just outward in space but in time itself. Most of the primordial antileptons are folded around the time-origin, raying "backwards" in time relative to the baryonic universe, because the past in this context is "less real" than the present (and the vectrinos/antileptons are "less real" overall, here, too), and is causally inaccessible versus the future (since the past is rendered necessary, in context, whereas the future is just what is to still be caused!). So, after an initial cancel-out, there is another rebound of the super-early universe that accomplishes relative baryogenesis by pushing the cancellative weight of the symmetry into an inaccessible state.

    2. Ripheus23

      Ripheus23

      How many particle correspondences do I have...

      Tetrahedra/simplexes: vectrons/leptons/vectrinos/antileptons

      Octahedra/rectified pentachoron/rectified hexateron: gluons/quarks/antiquarks

      Spheration: gravitons

      But there are also ways to virtually get:

      • Cube/tesseract/etc. particle sets (simple monadic tessellations)
      • Birectified hexatera: part of the vectron-gluon-X sequence (meaning: these = X in the sequence) in 5-dimensional satisfactory tessellation.
      • 4D- and 5D-particle sets corresponding to the kissing-number tessellations in 4D- and 5D-space.

      And probably some others, I think. So, we could make up a story where the total number of universes was read off the complete sets of particle crystals as such...

×
×
  • Create New...