Ripheus23

Alternative:

At the three-dimensional stage, there are 24 matter particles and 16 force (gluon/vectron/vectrino) particles (and the graviton and Higgs fields are computed separately). The second tetrahedron, and hence the vectrinos and antileptons, is directly computed by both the Moretti and the tessellation parameters. However, a second pentachoron is not computed at the four-dimensional stage, for the sake of tessellation, but it is only added in due to the Moretti parameter, here (the "logical di-simplexes of dimension n"). Accordingly, the 4-dimensional level of reality is "less real" than the 3-dimensional one. At the next, five-dimensional, stage, the principle of enclosure is violated due to the geometric degeneracy of the deontic graph that would appear, here. So, the spheration of the degenerate enclosure (which regenerates it) cascades throughout the entire pentadimensional crystal of geodesic potential, bringing about the dynamical phenomenon of knotical-graphical correspondence.

But the information reduction/collapse at this stage, and the 4-dimensional one, both contribute to the reduction of the equilibrium model, i.e. by the time the universe has entered its post-inflatonic phase, the model seems to imply that most of the primary list of particles will be mapped from the 3-dimensional deontic crystal. [The 3-dimensional level of reality is the "most" real, then, due to a joint satisfaction of the parameters in question?]

The triangular tiling does not require multiple simplices at the origin, so the 2-dimensional level of reality would also be "less real" than the 3-dimensional one. So far, then, it seems that if all these descriptions fit together coherently, that the 3-dimensional level of reality is where the energy flux of kairogenesis would stabilize.