Jump to content

Ripheus23

Members
  • Posts

    1318
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Ripheus23 last won the day on November 21 2018

Ripheus23 had the most liked content!

5 Followers

About Ripheus23

  • Birthday 07/15/1986

Profile Information

  • Member Title
    Aonspren
  • Location
    Wherever I ought to be
  • Interests
    Interesting things.

Ripheus23's Achievements

1.1k

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by Ripheus23

  1. OK, so the reason the first Ripheus book is supposed to be called The Axioms of Paradise is because the entire series is supposed to encode an elaborate moral theory, or theory of moral information, into itself. One of the keys to the system is the concept of the final offenses, which are the three ultimate forms of sin. Together, they are the Form of Evil itself because one of them is implicated in all wrongdoing simpliciter and the others, despite being fundamentally inspired by the one, are equivalent in demerit.

    So, this maximal evil cannot be perfectly committed by anyone, because rationalistic moral psychology rules it out. It is possible to map "consciously" and "unconsciously" to any junction of the three offenses, so there are 26 ways to consciously or subconsciously commit them at the same time. 9 of these would involve consciously committing the fundamental sin consciously, which is metaphysically impossible otherwise speaking, in conjunction with either the others consciously or unconsciously. So, there are only 17 arrangements that can actually obtain.

    Now in the story, the Form of Evil is a given entity or object, a real presence. It is, after all, what Apollyon destroys and then transcreates at the apex of the finale. Before this endgame, though, the Form of Evil tries to break itself into pieces that cannot be simultaneously destroyed, implanting its essence in 26 people who it resurrects from the dead: the Broken Ones. These are not wicked people, to be sure. They are infected but not controlled.

    The rules of the game, here, are that unless one of the 9 has been killed, none of the 17 can die. Until one of 9 dies, the advent of the Final Power will be greatly delayed. If any of the 9 die, then any of the 17 can be killed, but until one of them is, the advent of the Final Power will be forestalled. So, some of the quasi-protagonists will unfortunately end up accidentally hastening the apocalypse by killing some of the Broken Ones; or these beings will be inspired to kill themselves, or whatever. Maybe one is killed by others and one commits suicide. IDK but anyway, this situation is a counterpoint to Intuition's plot (Intuition being the Shard-like name for one of the Septatheon) to halt the Final Power, which is one of the highest-level arc questions of the series and the only question with two arc-answers (the problem of Intuition and the problem of the Broken Ones; all the other kinds of crisis are faced only once).

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. Ripheus23

      Ripheus23

      Now, there's a paradox, though, as I discussed in the thread "An incoherent problem?" since Apollyon is evil, so it seems as if destroying the Form of Evil would result in Apollyon self-destructing. So maybe I should refer to the Form of Evil as the Form of Sin and have the three void-Forms (Sin, Destruction, and Nothingness) as the "meta"-Form of Evil. IDK but I have to figure it out if I want to motivate myself to keep developing this story so much, I suppose...

    3. Ripheus23

      Ripheus23

      Hmm...

      • The Form of Demons
      • The Form of Darkness
      • The Form of the Void [Oblivion/Nothingness]
      • The Form of Corruption
      • The Form of Damnation
      • The Form of Retribution
      • The Form of Sin
      • The Form of Fire/Flame
      • The Form of Shadow
      • The Form of Murder
      • The Form of Death/the Dead
      • The Form of Annihilation
      • The Form of Immolation
      • The Form of Offense
      • The Form of Desecration
      • The Form of Desolation

      Hmm, I still like "the Form of Evil" for some reason. But ultimate evil is Apollyon + the void + the demon-Form, so IDK. Unless Apollyon really doesn't have free will? But then Apollyon can't use the Final Power, so... Argh...

      • The Sinfire
      • The Shadow-fire
      • The Form-sin
      • The demon-Form
      • The Sin-trinity
      • The Sin-ark [probably different context-reference]
      • The Sin-light
      • The Void-sin
      • Shadowmurder/Murder-shadow
      • "The Ark of Reckoning"
      • The Broken Form
      • The Sin-covenant
      • The Sin-halo
      • The Sin-worker
      • The Sin-god
      • The God-demon
      • The Sin-shadow
      • The sin-plenum
      • The Darkness-god
      • The Darkening
      • The Ark of Darkness?
      • ::: The Truth-light
      • The Form of Glory
    4. Ripheus23

      Ripheus23

      Again, the paradox is partly that Forms are supposed to be changing, but an abstract descriptor in itself shouldn't be given to change... So there would have to be an intermediary condition in which the Forms manifested in a different way than normally-physically... Kant calls such concepts "schema of the understanding," so the transdestruction of the Form of Evil would be the destruction of the schema of evil. But I want a more poetic word...

      The alternative would be to represent the Forms as abstract descriptors that depend on the power of the Game, the Joke, and the Test, somehow? This would depend on the metaphysics of transcreation in general, I suppose.

×
×
  • Create New...