shanerockes

Man I tried so hard to read through the backlog but yall are aggressive in posting. I have no real reads on anyone (and was never good at it anyway) but I will try my best to give some insight into my suspicions when I start watching the current posts. 

Hi friends. I'm just checking in right now and I gotta go through a lot of backlog so I might have some read on some people and have a vote this cycle but we shall see.

I would really like to play this game but I don't feel like I'll have enough time to get knowledgeable on the rules so can I get a spec doc?

46 minutes ago, EXPERIENCE said:

@shanerockes what do you have to say?

Not a whole lot really. I think everyone is better at analysis than I am and I don't have a lot of time today since I'm working from home today but I will try my best to acknowledge this this cycle but we shall see. 

What a game y'all. Definitely the best game I've had, though I haven't had many, and was the most exciting to play. Definite shout out to my teammate Venture, Elandera, and Rathmaskal. Couldn't have done it without y'all. Shout out to Kidpen and TGK for being totally awesome in the subset doc and having wonderful ideas, even if we were on opposing sides. And finally, thank you to DeTess and Araris for running this wonderful game and having wonderful write-ups. Can't wait for the next one and hopefully many more from me. 

Sign me up as Shaney Boi. Seems like a lot of fun. 

23 minutes ago, Alvron said:

Do you know if it reveals EBIs if scanned?

As I said, it just gives me the roles and the subset. And I realized that the vote count is 1 for one on me and you so I'm gonna stick a vote onto you for self pres. You can stick one on me as well but if it becomes not tied, I'll take my vote on you Alv. Sorry :/

Edit: Meant to say take not keep. Has completely different interpretations. 

1 minute ago, Alvron said:

Do your scans show up those that are EBIs or does it just gives roles and subset information?

It just showed me roles. It comes as a little write-up and says what subset they are in, not what it does and what role they have, if any. 

1 minute ago, Elkanah said:

Right, but who are the other three people you scanned?

Zillah, Abstrucity, and Rath. Zillah came up as your other partner in crime now in the Involuntary Holidays subset and is a thug. Abstrucity came up as a thug in the PR subset and Rath came up as vanilla in the legal subset. 

4 hours ago, Elkanah said:

Your scans could solve the game for us and the best reason for you withhold right now is if it incriminates your team.

Well I didn't want to really reveal myself because of the fact that it is such a useful tool. I was talking with Kid as well last cycle and we both were very wary of giving up our subset. I told him I would since he was the suit and I am not very useful otherwise. But I haven't scanned Alv but I have scanned you and can say that you are a copper ferring in the Involuntary Holidays subset. And I have suspicions towards you because of your accusation onto me. Yeah it would have been useful but if we had given ourselves up, we would have been gone sooner and been less useful. 

Alright so after much thinking, I've finally put a pin down on who to vote for. It was a tough choice for me between Rath and Bard. It really was a more instinctive choice because it's really hard for me but I'm just not fully comfortable with how he claimed and it hasn't felt right since the claim. @Young Bard just so you are aware that I have a vote onto you.

2 minutes ago, Coda said:

I have the unfortunate tendancy of saying nothing when I agree with the statements of the thread or when the thread is dead

I know that feeling. That's also why I don't post as much and cuz of work as well. Coda

Well it's almost been half the cycle and only two posts so I will post a poke vote towards Coda just because they are the one of the only ones I see lurking while I'm at work and haven't said anything. I really don't have a real target otherwise and would like some insight. @Coda so you are notified. 

22 hours ago, Alvron said:

Of those playing, I believe that Xino, myself, Shanerocks, Kidpen and Bard were the only ones not to post anything. 

Yes I didn't post anything the really during the N2 because I got caught up with work(working 2 jobs can really put a tax on your sleep schedule). Now I have to try and catch up on these posts and tried to find someone to put a vote on. I can see there is a vote train for Elandera and a lot of evidence to prove them so but I'm gonna look at last cycle to really come to a full vote onto them. 

15 hours ago, Elandera said:

I agree with your assessment of Shane. I don't like the vote, and I really don't like that it actually led to Experience's death, but I also don't see it being a deliberate elim move

I didn't like the vote either. I really just put the vote out there to try and make the odds less for him and in the end, he voted for me at the end and then died. I feel really bad about it. Now about it being at the end of cycle, I worked at the time the cycle ended and when I submitted my vote so I didn't realize it was near the end of cycle. 

59 minutes ago, Alvron said:

  At moment there's five active votes, each on one person so you only have a 20% chance of lynching

Let's change those numbers and make them a little less. I am going to put a vote onto Experience because a lack of vote doesn't help anything and I know this from prior experience and that's why I am having a vote first cycle. Plus, I feel better if it's left to chance then to have one target. 

1 hour ago, Young Bard said:

Alright, hello, everyone.

This is good enough for me. I was getting really I'd have to keep a vote on you and have you not able to play. No one likes dying D1 so Bard

8 minutes ago, Butt Ad Venture said:

But I don’t think you can kill GMs in this game seeing as it’s not a Joe or Alv game

I mean it's possible but I don't think it would be the same. Also, hello fellow hoomans. This game is going to be so much fun. As my first post into this, I'm gonna put a poke onto Bard because I need to poke a person. 

I'm signing up for this because it sounds really exciting. I don't know if I'll have a character yet but we will see.

Hi yes hello I am back.

18 hours ago, Fifth Scholar said:

Mmm. Not a huge fan of this idea; it surrenders information to the Elims if they’re dispersed in the playerlist, allows them coordination if they’re clumped, is dependent on 100% activity and compliance, and doesn’t create much public discussion

While I was reading through yesterday, I thought this as well but couldn't say anything about it cuz work. That's really all the thoughts I had while I was reading and I don't have a real read on anyone. I might pop back in later if there is more to discuss or I get a better read on some people.

23 minutes ago, Sart said:

Speaking of inactivity, I saw Shanerockes lurking in the thread, but he didn't post anything. It's worth a poke vote.

Yes I am lurking but because I am at work. I will have some thoughts when I get off

Alright boys and girls. It is time for me to make a resurgence. I am signing up as Shaney Boi 

I will join this game. Seems like tons of fun and definitely want to go insane lol
 

Conclude

Just now, Devotary of Spontaneity said:

Did you protect Sart from conversion, or from an attack? I'm pretty sure a Lurcher can only do one or the other, so if you protected from an attack that confirms Sart's innocence.

I protected him from the kill. I didn't think there was going to be a conversion and even if I did, I would have more than likely used it on someone else.