KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) I realised that there was no thread dedicated to this, so I decided to make one! Tau Day is coming up, after all. For those of you who don't know, Tau is equal to 2π, and is an alternative circle constant. τ is good because if you use π, a full circle is 2π radians, but with τ, it's just one τ radians, which makes trig waaaaay easier. So yes, I believe τ is objectively better than π, but I am also too used to π to swap now And also most calculators lack tau, and there's no song to help me memorise it, so... Anyways, what do y'all think of tau? Edited 3 hours ago by KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren SPaG
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago (edited) At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using. Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0. Edited 3 hours ago by Through the Living Hopper
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using. Probably, but there's still a chance 3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0. Oh yes, something I forgot to mention... With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero But with tau... e^(τi) = 1 So yeah, another reason tau is better
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 1 minute ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero But with tau... e^(τi) = 1 So yeah, another reason tau is better Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula.
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula. Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one The one is just there to make it a nicer number
Through the Living Hopper He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago Just now, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one The one is just there to make it a nicer number Also to add another identity. And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0).
KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren He/Him Posted 3 hours ago Author Posted 3 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: 3 minutes ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said: Also to add another identity. Why are you adding the multiplicative identity ? 2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said: And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0). One works just as well The extra +1 makes it not as good for π's
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now