Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I realised that there was no thread dedicated to this, so I decided to make one! Tau Day is coming up, after all.

For those of you who don't know, Tau is equal to 2π, and is an alternative circle constant. τ is good because if you use π, a full circle is 2π radians, but with τ, it's just one τ radians, which makes trig waaaaay easier.

So yes, I believe τ is objectively better than π, but I am also too used to π to swap now :P 

And also most calculators lack tau, and there's no song to help me memorise it, so...

Anyways, what do y'all think of tau?

Edited by KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren
SPaG
Posted
3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:

At this point, π has used enough that it's probably going to stay what we keep using.

Probably, but there's still a chance

3 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:

Plus e^(πi) + 1 = 0.

Oh yes, something I forgot to mention...

With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero

But with tau...

e^(τi) = 1

So yeah, another reason tau is better

Posted
1 minute ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said:

With π, Euler's Identity is kind of clunky because you need the +1 to make it a zero

But with tau...

e^(τi) = 1

So yeah, another reason tau is better

Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:

Except, 1 and 0 are two identities. 1 is the multiplicative, and 0 is the additive. Having only one of those two doesn't fully let us appreciate the beauty of the formula.

Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one

The one is just there to make it a nicer number

Posted
Just now, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said:

Yes, but e to the pi i doesn't equal 1, it equals negative one

The one is just there to make it a nicer number

Also to add another identity.

And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0).

Posted
2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:
3 minutes ago, KaladinsSenseOfHumourSpren said:

 

Also to add another identity.

 

Why are you adding the multiplicative identity ?

2 minutes ago, Through the Living Hopper said:

 

And that's a common way those formulas are written (to equal 0).

One works just as well

The extra +1 makes it not as good for π's

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...