Taupe Gecko Posted January 12 Posted January 12 14 minutes ago, Pearl Chameleon said: Previous Page Next Page A device let out a shrill and angry beep as Neugier’s heart stopped. Despite the best efforts of the small but dedicated SS TYRIAN medical crew, the damage was already done. As best as anyone could tell, Neugier had been on EVA making routine repairs along the surface of the exterior hull. A duty that had kept Neugier too busy to socialize much. As best as anyone could tell, no foul play had been involved. Just a stray piece of space debris moving at high speeds relative to the ship. Small enough that it posed no substantial threat to the TYRIAN, but large enough to rip through Neugier’s hardsuit without much difficulty. The extraterrestrial equivalent of getting struck by lightning. Similarly unlikely, too. But accidents happened sometimes. This is to say that Neugier was very much dead, but only very recently so. Only after a flurry of activity to recover the ailing body and unsuccessfully knit it back together. Even now, while the death was mere minutes ago, one final procedure still remained. The spiritweb could be extracted via hemalurgy, and installed in a new body. One fashioned not of flesh and blood but of steel and ettmetal. This was a last resort, for it was not a clean process. There would be losses. Memories in particular were delicate, and didn't always survive such a transferrence. It was Neugier’s last hope. Some Time Later In an empty chamber, machinery hummed to life as metalminds reached optimal charge thresholds and a bootup sequence completed. Metallic fingers flexed and unflexed. Lights flickered to life in a pair of sockets, which examined the new digits meticulously. The cyborg moved towards the exit, and the TYRIAN acknowledged its access and unbolted the door, which lead out into a fairly ordinary looking hallway. The hallway was not empty of crew, and its sensors focused on the nearest life sign. “Human,” it buzzed out. “Meatbag. Kindly cease ambulating and engage listening routines. This unit is operational. It is called CRANK. I await your orders.” Previous Page Next Page OMG it's a friend for H.E.A.R.T.H 1 minute ago, Ivory Dragonfly said: No. = Scarlet Octopus Violet Axolotl No c claim = no lying Huh?
Ivory Dragonfly Posted January 12 Posted January 12 The problem at hand: 4 x V!MB, 4 x V!Lurcher, 1 x V!CS This is absolutely not correct and unacceptable = Ocho is not actually v Quote Mint Heron was attacked by a Saboteur! They survived! Not Axolotl, not Dragonfly, not Weasel. = Zebra = v!Zebra @Pearl Chameleon role Lurcher, MB, or coinshot?
Taupe Gecko Posted January 12 Posted January 12 16 minutes ago, Ivory Dragonfly said: The problem at hand: 4 x V!MB, 4 x V!Lurcher, 1 x V!CS This is absolutely not correct and unacceptable = Ocho is not actually v Not Axolotl, not Dragonfly, not Weasel. = Zebra = v!Zebra @Pearl Chameleon role Lurcher, MB, or coinshot? How do you know "not Axolotl"? Axolotl told me via PM they would protect Heron As for the first half, what makes you think Octo is the one lying and not one of the Lurchers? Octo did take out an elim, that is nearly undeniable
Pearl Chameleon Posted January 12 Posted January 12 12 minutes ago, Ivory Dragonfly said: @Pearl Chameleon role Lurcher, MB, or coinshot? "That is to be my purpose in life?" CRANK beeped quizzically, tilting its head to one side. "To answer inane requests for information like a common drone?" "Acknowledged, human. Customer service designation has been selected. This allocation is permanent. Please hold..." "ERROR," CRANK beeped stridently. "No answer exists within the parameters of your stated question. Request not fulfilled. Meatbag, please revise your questioning skills." "I live to serve," CRANK buzzed. 1
Scarlet Octopus Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 hour ago, Taupe Gecko said: How do you know "not Axolotl"? Axolotl told me via PM they would protect Heron For N2?
Onyx Flamingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 hour ago, Ivory Dragonfly said: The problem at hand: 4 x V!MB, 4 x V!Lurcher, 1 x V!CS This is absolutely not correct and unacceptable = Ocho is not actually v Not Axolotl, not Dragonfly, not Weasel. = Zebra = v!Zebra @Pearl Chameleon role Lurcher, MB, or coinshot? Because of similar logic, I too have come to the conclusion that Octo is an eliminator. Ok guys I'm gonna do this, because I strongly feel like Octo is e! and the only way I can properly explain my reasoning is with this. N1, I raided Sage Kangaroo's body. I became a Seeker, and N2, I Seeked @Sunburst Toucan. Forgive me, Toucan, but I'm gonna have to roleclaim for you. Toucan is a Loyalist Coinshot. I believe that N1, Toucan shot Croc (Toucan, please correct me) Octo, an eliminator coinshot (not confirmed, theory), panicked and claimed coinshot after trying to shoot a v!Axolotl. Toucan thought that was strange, and voted him. However, N2, after narrowly escaping suspicion, shot a villager, intending to conver it up with an accident. I will admit, this theory does not account for Toucan N2, but I would love for toucan to chime in. I am not entirely sure about Zebra, but I believe that Scarlet Octopus is a Saboteur, and if we dont vote him out, I will seek him. (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared)
Ivory Dragonfly Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared) I live to serve! 1 hour ago, Taupe Gecko said: Axolotl told me via PM @Violet Axolotl?
Taupe Gecko Posted January 12 Posted January 12 16 minutes ago, Scarlet Octopus said: For N2? Yes 6 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: Because of similar logic, I too have come to the conclusion that Octo is an eliminator. Ok guys I'm gonna do this, because I strongly feel like Octo is e! and the only way I can properly explain my reasoning is with this. N1, I raided Sage Kangaroo's body. I became a Seeker, and N2, I Seeked @Sunburst Toucan. Forgive me, Toucan, but I'm gonna have to roleclaim for you. Toucan is a Loyalist Coinshot. I believe that N1, Toucan shot Croc (Toucan, please correct me) Octo, an eliminator coinshot (not confirmed, theory), panicked and claimed coinshot after trying to shoot a v!Axolotl. Toucan thought that was strange, and voted him. However, N2, after narrowly escaping suspicion, shot a villager, intending to conver it up with an accident. I will admit, this theory does not account for Toucan N2, but I would love for toucan to chime in. I am not entirely sure about Zebra, but I believe that Scarlet Octopus is a Saboteur, and if we dont vote him out, I will seek him. (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared) Alright what the flip Toucan if this is real why haven’t you protested yet Guys this is getting crazy 7 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared) The night may not fall on us
Scarlet Octopus Posted January 12 Posted January 12 4 minutes ago, Taupe Gecko said: Yes Axl said they protected me via PM
Onyx Flamingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Taupe Gecko said: Yes Alright what the flip Toucan if this is real why haven’t you protested yet Guys this is getting crazy The night may not fall on us It is real, Toucan did protest, but I also think they thought Octo was fishing for a counter-claim. Idk, I do think Octo is CS, just elim coinshot. Hopefully, but I think there is 5 elims. Very confident on my Octo theory, but I do need @Sunburst Toucan to confirm. Just now, Scarlet Octopus said: Axl said they protected me via PM 14 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: Because of similar logic, I too have come to the conclusion that Octo is an eliminator. Ok guys I'm gonna do this, because I strongly feel like Octo is e! and the only way I can properly explain my reasoning is with this. N1, I raided Sage Kangaroo's body. I became a Seeker, and N2, I Seeked @Sunburst Toucan. Forgive me, Toucan, but I'm gonna have to roleclaim for you. Toucan is a Loyalist Coinshot. I believe that N1, Toucan shot Croc (Toucan, please correct me) Octo, an eliminator coinshot (not confirmed, theory), panicked and claimed coinshot after trying to shoot a v!Axolotl. Toucan thought that was strange, and voted him. However, N2, after narrowly escaping suspicion, shot a villager, intending to conver it up with an accident. I will admit, this theory does not account for Toucan N2, but I would love for toucan to chime in. I am not entirely sure about Zebra, but I believe that Scarlet Octopus is a Saboteur, and if we dont vote him out, I will seek him. (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared) ^^^ Thoughts? edit: 8 minutes ago, Ivory Dragonfly said: I live to serve! @Violet Axolotl? Yes, that was me talking about my seeking (and one of the reasons I roleclaimed, I thought I was being too obvious, and decided to let everyone be on the same field (especially because of my mounting suspicions on Octo and inability to explain without roleclaim)) Edited January 12 by Onyx Flamingo
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Sorry it's been busy. I'm just gonna triage the most important things: @Onyx Flamingo I repeat: I get it but you are only telling me that you are personally very sure of Toucan given your read of their identity. I don't know who you are, I don't know who Toucan is, you being very sure tells me nothing because people can be mistaken in their reads. I think you're Village and don't need to know who you both are but we are not at a stage of the game I can accept a raw, "trust me bro" vouch anymore. I need you to explain why you think Toucan is V, pointing to the factors that create this certainty in you. @Plum Rhinoceros: I think it's moved past us at this point but fundamentally I think you are excluding certain votes (e.g. Ig D1) as being indicative of alignment while credencing on other votes (e.g Ig D2.) I am concerned about FUD in that I think you are moving to keep Axl in the suspect pool rather than shrinking PoE and doing it by saying "Ah but have you considered a world for which we have no evidence and no likelihood assessment for but it's possible and because it's possible, a v!read cannot be ascribed." I distrust this because I think Elim strategy at the clean-up stage is to keep PoE as wide open as possible. @Whoever: The only thing I can add to the current Lurcher debate is that I agree that 4 Lurchers and potentially up to four V!MB is an intrinsically weird distro. I'm not confident in saying where the issue is but I struggle in seeing 4 V!L being considered ok on the OG ruleset even with E!CS. I'm wary of a WBG on Zebra's part tbh. Ocho PMed me last night saying to exe Axl if they died. I don't know if this means Ocho and Axl had initially arranged for Axl to Lurch Ocho since I did not reach out to Axl at all. There's a world Axl said they'd protect Ocho and Ocho decides U can thus be killed ig. I can't contribute to @Taupe Gecko or @Violet Axolotl or @Quartz Zebra here because I probably should be dead and don't know what went down. I just... don't super feel like Ocho's play is very E!CS? IDK man I just feel like they've not been very keen to try to pocket the Lurchers or reach out to them. I feel like my PM asking Ocho to consided PMing DF or Axl just had Ocho shrugging and going "well I hope they protect me" without having ever said they reached out to DF/Axl. You could say they distrusted me but I think it's harder for Elims to remember to fake that kind of paranoia when they're trying to pocket. At the same time I struggle to understand a CS so scared of being exed (proving themselves etc) go "yo if the Elims kill me they kill me ig." I also think Rhino raises a fair question wrt how the Lurchers all reacted to Dingo/ - you know what wtaf wtf did I just see. Guys what. Wtf. EDIT: I AM COMING BACK WHEN YOU MFERS STOP CLAIMING WTF I MEAN OK I GEDDIT TY FLAM THIS MAKES SENSE BUT ALSO WTF GUYS I CANNOT EVEN 1
Onyx Flamingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: Sorry it's been busy. I'm just gonna triage the most important things: @Onyx Flamingo I repeat: I get it but you are only telling me that you are personally very sure of Toucan given your read of their identity. I don't know who you are, I don't know who Toucan is, you being very sure tells me nothing because people can be mistaken in their reads. I think you're Village and don't need to know who you both are but we are not at a stage of the game I can accept a raw, "trust me bro" vouch anymore. I need you to explain why you think Toucan is V, pointing to the factors that create this certainty in you. @Plum Rhinoceros: I think it's moved past us at this point but fundamentally I think you are excluding certain votes (e.g. Ig D1) as being indicative of alignment while credencing on other votes (e.g Ig D2.) I am concerned about FUD in that I think you are moving to keep Axl in the suspect pool rather than shrinking PoE and doing it by saying "Ah but have you considered a world for which we have no evidence and no likelihood assessment for but it's possible and because it's possible, a v!read cannot be ascribed." I distrust this because I think Elim strategy at the clean-up stage is to keep PoE as wide open as possible. @Whoever: The only thing I can add to the current Lurcher debate is that I agree that 4 Lurchers and potentially up to four V!MB is an intrinsically weird distro. I'm not confident in saying where the issue is but I struggle in seeing 4 V!L being considered ok on the OG ruleset even with E!CS. I'm wary of a WBG on Zebra's part tbh. Ocho PMed me last night saying to exe Axl if they died. I don't know if this means Ocho and Axl had initially arranged for Axl to Lurch Ocho since I did not reach out to Axl at all. There's a world Axl said they'd protect Ocho and Ocho decides U can thus be killed ig. I can't contribute to @Taupe Gecko or @Violet Axolotl or @Quartz Zebra here because I probably should be dead and don't know what went down. I just... don't super feel like Ocho's play is very E!CS? IDK man I just feel like they've not been very keen to try to pocket the Lurchers or reach out to them. I feel like my PM asking Ocho to consided PMing DF or Axl just had Ocho shrugging and going "well I hope they protect me" without having ever said they reached out to DF/Axl. You could say they distrusted me but I think it's harder for Elims to remember to fake that kind of paranoia when they're trying to pocket. At the same time I struggle to understand a CS so scared of being exed (proving themselves etc) go "yo if the Elims kill me they kill me ig." I also think Rhino raises a fair question wrt how the Lurchers all reacted to Dingo/ - you know what wtaf wtf did I just see. Guys what. Wtf. ok you missed a lot TL;DR I lied about knowing Toucan (trying to cover up seeker) decided it was too sus and wasn't working well, claimed Seeker, Toucan is Loyalist CS, I think Octo is elim. 17 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: Because of similar logic, I too have come to the conclusion that Octo is an eliminator. Ok guys I'm gonna do this, because I strongly feel like Octo is e! and the only way I can properly explain my reasoning is with this. N1, I raided Sage Kangaroo's body. I became a Seeker, and N2, I Seeked @Sunburst Toucan. Forgive me, Toucan, but I'm gonna have to roleclaim for you. Toucan is a Loyalist Coinshot. I believe that N1, Toucan shot Croc (Toucan, please correct me) Octo, an eliminator coinshot (not confirmed, theory), panicked and claimed coinshot after trying to shoot a v!Axolotl. Toucan thought that was strange, and voted him. However, N2, after narrowly escaping suspicion, shot a villager, intending to conver it up with an accident. I will admit, this theory does not account for Toucan N2, but I would love for toucan to chime in. I am not entirely sure about Zebra, but I believe that Scarlet Octopus is a Saboteur, and if we dont vote him out, I will seek him. (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared)
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, Oxblood Beagle said: What did I return to... HOW DO YOU THINK IT FEELS BEAGLE Edit: 2 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: ok you missed a lot TL;DR I lied about knowing Toucan (trying to cover up seeker) decided it was too sus and wasn't working well, claimed Seeker, Toucan is Loyalist CS, I think Octo is elim. Yeah I realised sorry, even cut off my post because of it. I think my one question is: if Toucan actually shot Croc, why did Toucan not shoot Ocho last Night? Because we didn't see an attack write-up at all and Toucan would then know Ocho was lying. I think there's a pragmatic case for voting Ocho at this point if we still agree you're V because protected targets can still die to overspill (NK + shot)
Oxblood Beagle Posted January 12 Posted January 12 (edited) On 1/11/2026 at 2:43 AM, Onyx Flamingo said: Spoiler V!read Toucan - I know there is a lot of suspicion on them, but I am sure that they are v On 1/11/2026 at 7:00 AM, Onyx Flamingo said: Why wouldn't I know who Toucan is if I v!read them? @Onyx Flamingo Omg I thought others had caught on to your softclaim because you had said that Toucan is v with full certainty that I figured you must have been the Kandra turned Seeker. And in a different post, you asked it like, why wouldn't I know (what Toucan's role is) if (I checked them)? @Indigo Weasel Can I ask what made you decide to claim? From earlier actions, I had thought you were opposed to people claiming roles 5 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: HOW DO YOU THINK IT FEELS BEAGLE Feels like things suddenly went into overdrive LOL Edited January 12 by Oxblood Beagle
Violet Axolotl Posted January 12 Posted January 12 5 hours ago, Quartz Zebra said: You call me "active but contributing little"? That’s 'cause I’m busy making sure the Lurcher-lines don't cross and blow us all to the Spiritual Realm! And also, what do you mean Echo? I'm the darned lurcher who saved Zense! Hold up, when did you claim lurcher??? So there are 3 lurchers???? Also, sorry, that's a plain lie. I lurched heron. @Scarlet Octopus, I'm sorry, to be honest I lied to you. I wasn't sure about you, but I did feel that heron was villager. I implied in some PMs that I was lurching you to keep attention off you, then lurched heron instead.
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Oxblood Beagle said: Omg I thought others had caught on to your softclaim I considered it but I just wanted to make sure it was not Flam being weird about Toucan Ocho???? Two V!CS????? Like. Can that distro work? I know it's a Jo and TUM- AAAAAAAAAAA OH MY GOD WHY FML I DO NOT HAVE ENOUGH CAFFEINE FOR THIS OR SAN OMGWTFBBQ Edit: @Violet Axolotl ...Weasel claimed Lurcher too bruv. Four Lurcher claims, Flam claimed kandra turned Seeker who scanned Toucan as a V!CS. Welcome to hell.
Onyx Flamingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 9 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: HOW DO YOU THINK IT FEELS BEAGLE Edit: Yeah I realised sorry, even cut off my post because of it. I think my one question is: if Toucan actually shot Croc, why did Toucan not shoot Ocho last Night? Because we didn't see an attack write-up at all and Toucan would then know Ocho was lying. I think there's a pragmatic case for voting Ocho at this point if we still agree you're V because protected targets can still die to overspill (NK + shot) My theory has flaws, but Toucan did say On 1/9/2026 at 10:51 PM, Sunburst Toucan said: Okay, the transparency of this has convinced me that Octopus is probably an actual village Coinshot. I would like to retract my earlier suspicions, although I still think claiming Coinshot was a strange move. N2. They might have just assumed they both shot the same person. Still need Toucan input, though. 4 minutes ago, Oxblood Beagle said: @Onyx Flamingo Omg I thought others had caught on to your softclaim because you had said that Toucan is v with full certainty that I figured you must have been the Kandra turned Seeker. And in a different post, you asked it like, why wouldn't I know (what Toucan's role is) if (I checked them)? @Indigo Weasel Can I ask what made you decide to claim? From earlier actions, I had thought you were opposed to people claiming roles Feels like things suddenly went into overdrive LOL Yeah thats why I full roleclaimed because I thought that maybe the eliminators would catch it but not the village and I wished to share more info.
Violet Axolotl Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: Weasel claimed Lurcher too bruv Wait WHAT??? FOUR???
Mint Heron Posted January 12 Posted January 12 Just now, Violet Axolotl said: Wait WHAT??? FOUR??? YES AND APPARENTLY FLAM SCANNED TOUCAN AS V!CS SOMETHING IS V WRONG DIGGA SOMETHING IS V V WRONG Edit: For the record I would like to claim that I am NOT A LURCHER!!!
Violet Axolotl Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Mint Heron said: YES AND APPARENTLY FLAM SCANNED TOUCAN AS V!CS SOMETHING IS V WRONG DIGGA SOMETHING IS V V WRONG Edit: For the record I would like to claim that I am NOT A LURCHER!!! I thought after what zebra said it was safe to vote them but idek anymore
Onyx Flamingo Posted January 12 Posted January 12 1 minute ago, Mint Heron said: YES AND APPARENTLY FLAM SCANNED TOUCAN AS V!CS SOMETHING IS V WRONG DIGGA SOMETHING IS V V WRONG Edit: For the record I would like to claim that I am NOT A LURCHER!!! Honestly, revolutionary claim. I believe that there are 4,923 lurchers in this game, Gorrilla the TIEBREAKER being one of them.
Scarlet Octopus Posted January 12 Posted January 12 2 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: ^^^ Thoughts? I don't see why we're trying to deflect to me again, I thought we already went through this once. Yes, I belive you that Toucan is a loyalist coinshot bc they roleclaimed to me too, and that would be a hard thing to lie about unless E/E, which is don't think is likely. But if this is true, then why would Toucan have not claimed sooner? Because I killed Croc and Elephant, I'm not lying about that, there would be no point, the other person would counterclaim and I'd get exed, which if I'm an Elim, is the worst thing I could do, but if you're so sure exing me is going to solve everything, which it might because my identity wont be ambiguous anymore. Then sure, go ahead, let's exe me, Octo, im busy this next week anyways. 1 minute ago, Violet Axolotl said: Also, sorry, that's a plain lie. I lurched heron. @Scarlet Octopus, I'm sorry, to be honest I lied to you. I wasn't sure about you, but I did feel that heron was villager. I implied in some PMs that I was lurching you to keep attention off you, then lurched heron instead. Well. I didn't get targeted so it must've worked.
Opal Lion Posted January 12 Posted January 12 [A new message appears in your inbox, likely sent to you by accident] NOTICE TO USER: 1. Apologies for the delay in replying. I have compiled my thoughts below while reading through the reports as you (are going to) request(ed). 2. Please note I did this at a detriment to my own sanity. 3. I did not read in much detail. You cannot just send me this many pages and expect me to read!! If you have specific inquiries, please attach the relevant information in your next message. PS. Have you read through that 216-page paper I sent you? I'd like to discuss it soon with someone competent enough to understand what it means. There's no one smart enough on this ship, ugh. I look forward to your next correspondence. [You find an attached file that appears to be a set of handwritten notes] [You squint and can barely make out words through the messy writing] TRANSCRIPT OF THOUGHTS: 1. As I do not need to make inferences in real time, I skipped ahead to the page flagged as IMPORTANT to discover that deceased figures "Sage Kangaroo", "Saffron Iguana", and "Mauve Crocodile" were Saboteurs, and designation "Sapphire Elephant" was a Loyalist. 2. As noted from the first vote total attached, new figure designated "Violet Axolotl" may be unaligned from the Saboteurs, as this person caught heat from a known deceased Saboteur on the first day, "Mauve Crocodile". Without reading, I cannot make this conclusion more solid. *** Note: Read more in detail later 3.. Also important to the first vote total is "Sage Kangaroo" and designation "Indigo Weasel" voting each other. As figure "Sage Kangaroo" chose to make this vote very late, I am not sure this means anything for the loyalty of "Indigo Weasel." 4. However, it confuses me as to why "Sage Kangaroo" chooses to vote "Indigo Weasel" over "Violet Axolotl" here, given that a Loyalist "Violet Axolotl" vote would have allowed the Saboteur to live to see another day, no? 5. [This line starts with several crossed out misspellings of taupe] "Taupe Gecko" had good energy at the end of the first day, and a good vote switch (especially if "Violet Axolotl" is revealed as a Loyalist). I like this person. 6. "Oxblood Beagle" looks good from end of day activities for similar reasoning. [A crossed out scribble in the margins reads:] Sorry to break from professionalism, but this is SO BORING to read through. Surely I have better things to do than study this, right? Ugh, I'm not going to discover anything from sifting through paragraphs of junk. [The transcript continues] 7. From the second "day" of reports, I definitely approve of "Oxblood Beagle" for focus on known Saboteur "Saffron Iguana". 8. I skipped ahead to the second attached vote count. At a glance, I like those who voted for the Saboteur (duh), but specifically "Mint Heron", who caught my attention earlier for seemingly genuine uncertainty regarding votes at the end of the first day. 9. At most, I believe it is likely that only one of the six voters are Saboteurs. For no reason other than I believe that is how one would approach this situation, without much context on how anyone was approaching the situation in the first place. [A half erased note that can be barely deciphered] [???] hard to keep track of everyth[???] SOO BORINGG... why did I become a scholar just to [unreadable writing] could [???] nt my time reading the latest edition of [???]'s new textbook on [the text is too small to read] [The transcript continues] 10. At this point, I changed my approach from "read nothing" to "attempt to read through what the Saboteurs said". Sigh. Hours of my life wasted... 11. From the perspective of "Sage Kangaroo", I feel I gained nothing. Perhaps they took an awkward approach to "Scarlet Octopus" regarding liking the aforementioned person's work. I draw no conclusion on this, as I could see it as a Saboteur trying to gain reputation with a Loyalist. A bit pointed for it to be a Saboteur defending another Saboteur, but my estimation of "Sage Kangaroo" is that they may have been new to this line of work. 12. I believe designation "Ivory Dragonfly" may be unaligned (and therefore a Loyalist) due to the opinion of "Sage Kangaroo" on the aforementioned. 13. There is a noteworthy so-called "poke vote" interaction between "Saffron Iguana" and "Sage Kangaroo", both deceased Saboteurs. It is seen again between "Sage Kangaroo" and "Mauve Crocodile". *** Keep an eye out for similar details between others. [A break in the message. You scroll to the next page to find more] 14. From the perspective of "Mauve Crocodile", I noticed that this figure chose to defend designation "Ivory Dragonfly". Since they chose to push in the direction of new figure "Salmon Meerkat", I believe this increases the odds of "Salmon Meerkat" being a Loyalist. 15. I would note I am unsure what this means for "Ivory Dragonfly", as I before had leaned towards them being unaligned with the Saboteurs. 16. Note that later on, "Mauve Crocodile" throws "Ivory Dragonfly" in a pool of people they call "cleared". 17. The odds increase as "Salmon Meerkat" votes for "Sage Kangaroo" in response. 18. From the perspective of "Saffron Iguana", it seems their last plays largely may not be helpful to analyze since their hand was likely forced. 19. "Saffron Iguana" has awkward play around "Scarlet Octopus". This is the second time I have noticed such play around designation "Scarlet Octopus". 20. Much of the treatment "Saffron Iguana" gave "Scarlet Octopus" revolves around defending the latter, yet later says that they would prefer "Scarlet Octopus" dies over figure "Mint Heron". 21. This makes me wonder if "Saffron Iguana" knew "Scarlet Octopus" was a Loyalist and so had a weird treatment of not wanting to vote "Scarlet Octopus" while also preferring the aforementioned person would die (burden of TMI, they call it, perhaps?). 22. In past texts, I have seen instances where this is reminiscent of the way two Saboteurs treat each other (not wanting to defend too much and look like allies, but not wanting the other to die). I am increasingly uncertain on my opinion of "Scarlet Octopus". 23. I later noticed that designation "Scarlet Octopus" claimed a role of "village coinshot" earlier. 24. I read both the mentioned designation's reasons for shooting "Mauve Crocodile" (not very conclusive; reasoning was lacking but not necessarily indicative of a lie) and claiming the shot (was fine I suppose, I don't mind it). 25. I do find it a little weird to have claimed there immediately. Is Loyalist firepower not important to keep quiet about so that you will not be targeted by the Saboteurs? Unless they were only given a single shot. The immediate claim is what I find most suspicious for "Scarlet Octopus", along with awkward treatment from two known Saboteurs. 26. The deceased Saboteur "Saffron Iguana" spoke out against "Salmon Meerkat", which continues to lead me to believe that "Salmon Meerkat" is likely a Loyalist. 27. Who is this DF person who keeps being mentioned?? CONCLUSION: [A chart has been scribbled across the bottom of the page] + Salmon Meerkat, Oxblood Beagle, Taupe Gecko +~ Ivory Dragonfly (?????), Mint Heron Person of interest: Scarlet Octopus - [this area is blank] 1. If I had to guess, someone with claimed firepower is lying about being a Loyalist from the distro information I keep seeing. I am not sure who has claimed such a thing. In fact, I'm not aware of most claims. Please send me a list of this info at the earliest convenient time. 2. Please inform me if you would like a claim from me. I would be happy to oblige. 3. I should be in contact for several hours should you wish to follow up with me immediately. [A note at the bottom in small text reads:] honestly this took me so long to write and I got nothing out of what I read so just give me directions for what to read at this point please 1
Taupe Gecko Posted January 12 Posted January 12 19 minutes ago, Oxblood Beagle said: What did I return to... 18 minutes ago, Mint Heron said: HOW DO YOU THINK IT FEELS BEAGLE As H.E.A.R.T.H was beginning to prepare for his second daily recharge, all heck broke loose in the cafeteria. Well. That was interesting. 2 hours ago, Pearl Chameleon said: Previous Page Next Page "That is to be my purpose in life?" CRANK beeped quizzically, tilting its head to one side. "To answer inane requests for information like a common drone?" "Acknowledged, human. Customer service designation has been selected. This allocation is permanent. Please hold..." "ERROR," CRANK beeped stridently. "No answer exists within the parameters of your stated question. Request not fulfilled. Meatbag, please revise your questioning skills." "I live to serve," CRANK buzzed. Previous Page Next Page H.E.A.R.T.H wheeled over to CRANK. ”Greetings.” He waved. “You appear to be… like me. Albeit…” he looked him up and down, and chose his next words carefully. “More rudimentary.” H.E.A.R.T.H shifted his focus to the heart of the debate. 37 minutes ago, Onyx Flamingo said: Because of similar logic, I too have come to the conclusion that Octo is an eliminator. Ok guys I'm gonna do this, because I strongly feel like Octo is e! and the only way I can properly explain my reasoning is with this. N1, I raided Sage Kangaroo's body. I became a Seeker, and N2, I Seeked @Sunburst Toucan. Forgive me, Toucan, but I'm gonna have to roleclaim for you. Toucan is a Loyalist Coinshot. I believe that N1, Toucan shot Croc (Toucan, please correct me) Octo, an eliminator coinshot (not confirmed, theory), panicked and claimed coinshot after trying to shoot a v!Axolotl. Toucan thought that was strange, and voted him. However, N2, after narrowly escaping suspicion, shot a villager, intending to conver it up with an accident. I will admit, this theory does not account for Toucan N2, but I would love for toucan to chime in. I am not entirely sure about Zebra, but I believe that Scarlet Octopus is a Saboteur, and if we dont vote him out, I will seek him. (also can a lurcher please protect me during the night? One of the main reasons I was hesitant to roleclaim was because I was scared) “That would be… illuminating.” The information was damning, but H.E.A.R.T.H was not so quick to jump to the throttle. While he struggled to imagine a scenario that would force an evil Flamingo to make such statements, he chose to await responses from the Toucan and the Axolotl to take concrete action - as not all facts seemed to line up, and the truth seemed to devolve more and more into a haze. Paradoxically, considering the flood of revelations that consumed the evening. As all the information fought to be processed, H.E.A.R.T.H’s mind was elsewhere. In his last dreams, he had at last broken free of seemingly endless hell and returned to war in a changed world. Yet it was not the events that alarmed him, but the patterns in them he recognized. Patterns he saw in the Way of Kings, and was beginning to recall from his history records - when he could spare the charge. And at last, a picture of H.E.A.R.T.H’s past was beginning to form from the fog. A picture of red and black and white, of Honor and Passion and Surges and Radiance. In his past lives, H.E.A.R.T.H had been a voidbringer - and in his memories, the Night of Sorrows neared. 1 minute ago, Scarlet Octopus said: I don't see why we're trying to deflect to me again, I thought we already went through this once. Yes, I belive you that Toucan is a loyalist coinshot bc they roleclaimed to me too, and that would be a hard thing to lie about unless E/E, which is don't think is likely. But if this is true, then why would Toucan have not claimed sooner? Because I killed Croc and Elephant, I'm not lying about that, there would be no point, the other person would counterclaim and I'd get exed, which if I'm an Elim, is the worst thing I could do, but if you're so sure exing me is going to solve everything, which it might because my identity wont be ambiguous anymore. Then sure, go ahead, let's exe me, Octo, im busy this next week anyways. Well. I didn't get targeted so it must've worked. Alright what the frick this plot is thickening too quickly
Recommended Posts