Mystfall

Anyway, another thing to note is that Striker’s vote was moved off of Hoid

I feel like it’s not. Assuming the coinshot is meta Elim that means they are going to snipe another pseudo Elim tonight, I feel like that’s very much a now problem

Only in the meta game, if you die in the pseudo game you can’t post or get PMs during its cycles

Okay. @|TJ| sorry, I was asleep. I didn’t have anything against Coder, if you look at the thread, I was trying to get us off of him. But an exe is better than no exe, so I had my vote on him. Also: I told you so everyone Time to react to this cycle now. Fallen dying just means they’re going after inactive people as to not share any information. So all we can really take from that is in the future be suspicious of any inactive person who isn’t dying(assuming the game lasts that long for it to come up)

VC: Myst (1): Araris Coder (4): Hoid, Coco, Myst, Mippo edit: lol ninja’d

Me, confusing?? Never Well, Coder has 3 votes, so he is going out unless we decide to change that

Currently we’re exeing Coder but we’re looking for other options

*the crackling of a campfire*

*mosquitoes*

I would be fine with that actually. I’m looking at the vote spreadsheet/psuedo d1 thread and I’m not liking how he kind of just echoes Striker His first two votes are just a repeat of strikers(striker did his first I checked)

Gimme a sec, I’ll go bug Fallen, can’t do much about anyone else though

I’m the only one using this reasoning though? That’s only a problem if other people do it as well. And right now I’d settle for everyone else to pop in and leave a vote, regardless of who or why

Thanks I’ll… consider it

I’m gonna get exed for that you know

lol fair, I just have some really fun things I want to do Coder Myst back to normal we go

From my pov it’s just a who you want to confirm as village, Coder or I?

Okay. After checking the rules and doing some stuff in my GM PM. I have decided that it is in my best interests to get voted out in the Meta-game. Also side effect of making yall not vote Coder. Why you ask? Because then I can do all sorts of super shady stuff in the pseudo game and it’ll be fun because I’ll be confirmed Village so you can’t vote me out for it. And then if I get NKed it confirms a Meta Elim coinshot or Elim. Coder Myst C’mon yall we’re 2/3 there already

So that we have an exe? We need at least 3 votes in order to exe someone. And exing someone is preferable to exing no one right now. As I said, if there is an alternative train to Coder I will join that instead. But since you are voting me instead of Coder, that means for now I have to jump in to make it viable. My reasons for not wanting to vote Coder are that I don’t want to exe the same person twice back to back this early. Considering you don’t seem to agree with that, my only other option is to attack the argument itself Unfortunately I can’t argue with “the best we have”. It’s either that or a shot in the dark(I’m sure Araris would be fine exeing me though) Edit: unironically, I think I might be fine with that

If I wanted to I could just ask Xino (if he replies, I’ve already asked him if he told anyone he was a coinshot, including in Elim doc, as that would narrow down the suspects and he hasn’t gotten back to me)

So: 1. Lying =/= elim 2. Elim =/= lying In this case I’d say yes, if he is lying then he is Elim, a NK kill is big enough for that. But, if your argument revolves around saying that “if he lied though, then he’s Elim” when you don’t know he lied… that’s not really a good argument. (Briefly going to my potential argument against striker) It depends on whether or not Hoid is Pseudo Elim. If Hoid tells me he is Psuedo Elim, I’m not going to exe Hoid because “If he’s Elim he has motivation to lie”

Fair enough edit: that said, that’s all Coder’s done too(unless he’s lying about not killing Xino)

My main problem with exing Coder is basically that we’ve already exed them in one game, doing both back to back d1 seems really mean. As I said, I would be fine exing him in a future cycle, just not these first two, I’d like to give him time to defend himself, and figure out what in the world is going on. I plan on doing the same thing to the people we exe Psuedo day 2, giving them till D3, and after that I figure they’ve had enough time and I’m fine with exing someone in the pseudo game and then again in the meta game right after. Id like to avoid it for now As for your actual argument, just one question, but other than that it’s convincing. I do not like the idea of exing him right after exing him in the pseudo game. Why Coder and not Xino? The only difference between the two is that Coder could’ve killed Xino and Xino couldn’t have killed Coder and their pseudo game alingments. I think that’s all I have for now. I do not like the idea of voting Coder. If there is another viable train that happens in the next 20 hours I will switch my vote. However: Coder

My Anti-Striker was dependent on something else I don’t want to exe him, but if that something is true. Then yes, I would.

I’m a Kings Wit, therefore, everyone must either be offended or dying laughing

You’d need quite a good case, I really don’t want to exe Coder or Xino right now. Not saying we shouldn’t but I’m personally going to wait till C3 ish before I look at them. In the case that both are Meta Elim there’s probably a 3rd we can find