Jump to content

Experience

Members
  • Posts

    4378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by Experience

  1. Sounds good. Quick question. I couldn't find it in the rules so on a lynch vote tie, is it random or are both killed.
  2. So I've been making a game I would like to GM, but I really haven't played this for that long and I don't know if everything is balanced. I would just post it into this thread, but it's a blackout game, so I'm not sure what to do.
  3. Also, I'm guessing the thread is going to be next to silent now, so please speak. To stay silent only helps the eliminators.
  4. I went back and reviewed last cycle and I don't know Ironfires play style well enough to know if they were just trying to speak reason. For now I'm going to vote for Elandera, partly because of what Zillah said, but also because TGK voted on them. This might have been done to cast suspicion off of Elandera.
  5. Well, I'm voting on Ironfire because they seemed like they were defending TGK. Good job DeTess.
  6. Ironfire, I do agree with you but this is the best lead we have so I think that we might as well take it.
  7. Well, I can honestly say I didn't see that coming. Interesting. I'm going to think on this for a little longer and maybe as some questions in PM's, but I'll see what happens.
  8. So, here are my thoughts on some people as of now. DeTess, GodKing: I'm pretty sure they are town because of PM's. Also they are some of the biggest contributors and I think that if they die then the thread will practically go silent. Ironfire, Elandera: Slight elim feel. I probably would have voted on Ironfire earlier partially due to inactivity, but they are new so I hesitate. Elandera was the last person to vote on Rath. @Elandera, is there a reason that you did this? Everyone else: I'm not really sure about everyone else. People just haven't talked enough in thread for me to figure out much. Those of you who are barely talking in thread are just helping the eliminators by not giving us better information to lynch someone off of.
  9. I think I'm going to keep my vote on Shane
  10. I'm still on the edge wether to change my vote to someone else. I could go either way, but I don't really understand the reasoning so far as to why or why not to vote someone who was inactive.
  11. Yes I agree with Godking. Hopefully @shanerockes can answer before the end of the cycle
  12. This is day 3. And yes the eliminators might do this, but the town is also trying to find people to Lynch. Also those that are voting are the ones talking, at least for the most part so we don't want to get rid of that.
  13. Sart appears to be the only one on right now who has not talked this cycle, but for all I know they could be typing something up right now.
  14. So I just went back and read through past cycles. Shanerocks has only posted once, and they said they didn't have much to say so my votes on them for now.
  15. I honestly just included everyone other then DeTess because they have talked much more then everyone else.
  16. It's sort of hard to have a reason to Lynch someone when they barely talk and I don't really know their playing style. Yes I was the second to vote on StrikerEZ, but I have only followed someone's vote once. And it doesn't make it easier to find the maf when more then half of the players don't/barely talk at all and don't vote. It would be helpful if everyone could talk more so we could have a better reason to Lynch on someone. @Elandera @Ironfire @Zillah @Kynedath @The_God_King @shanerockes @Rathmaskal @Sart @Straw @STINK
  17. Right now Striker because they haven't said anything. @StrikerEZ
  18. Also, @Zillah I think that it is better to vote on someone then not because it is probably the only way to kill a maf.
  19. Mostly because I want people to talk more. And a slight feeling(but I don't know I can trust those). @Ironfire, what do you have to say?
×
×
  • Create New...