Jump to content

Hellscythe

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    389

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Hellscythe

  1. Hellscythe
    Alright so I ranted about the new episode in a comment section on Youtube and I thought I'd copy paste it over here to see if anyone has any opinions on my opinions. Opinionception. My thoughts on Star Wars Episode 7
  2. Hellscythe
    If you'll have me I'd like to sign up as the village's Spooky Scary Ghostie. Wait so the soother Negates one vote which means it doesn't change it to another player? It just completely nullifies a vote? Or is it changed to another player, because in the next sentence you talk about change. But then in the Rioter you Italicize the word change. I'm getting mixed signals :l Soother: Their ability to dampen emotions puts them and the Rioter in a very special position. During any time during the day round (up until the round ends), they can negate one person's vote. The change will be anonymous, but since I will be posting voting results at the end of each day, those that are observant should be able to tell whose votes were changed. Rioter: The Rioter works in a similar fashion as the Soother, except once during the day round they can change one person's vote. Using this power does nullify their own vote though. They are still capable of voting, but their vote will not be counted. The change itself will be anonymous, but since I will be posting voting results at the end of each day, those that are observant should be able to tell whose votes were changed.
  3. Hellscythe
    So we can talk about it openly here? Or do we need the spoiler tags? I thought the purpose of this thread was so we didn't have to do that.
  4. Hellscythe
    Despite being poisoned, possibly twice... the poisoned food tasted delicious. Thanks Cook.
  5. Hellscythe
    1) I already apologized for responding to Mail's taunts from yesterday. It was my bad. I'm gonna taunt the Diagrammists all day though. 2) Yes. I have no other solid suspicions (other than you now like I said before) so the best choice is to kill an inactive. If towards the end of the game it's 10 vs. 5 with the innocents having 10 and 5 of those 10 people are inactive because nobody wanted to lynch an inactive and the Diagrammists have no reason to kill the inactives I've already lost the game and that's not something I want to live to see. 3) Like I said to Advantos, I had planned on Role Claiming today regardless of what Stink said, Stink just hastened the claim. Adavantos did the exact same thing last game. You weren't here so I'm not blaming you for not understanding. But essentially he thought Creccio was innocent but put the killing vote on him anyways because his role "wasn't good enough for the town" as all he could do was Role block. Also It's not like I could just NOT respond to Stink's claim that I was an Explorer/Elsecaller. Obviously my role is better if it isn't known, but it's better than being lynched/attacked for not role claiming when your role has already been stated by someone else. I've already said my piece on Scholars. Obviously it's too late to not be lynched but this is something real to defend against I suppose. Also no. Mail's vote is still on me. Now it's not.
  6. Hellscythe
    The fact that your top 3 suspicions just happen to be everyone up for the lynch is no surprise to me. Diagrammists do find it hard to find their own suspicions. I understand though. I've been there and it's not easy. But I mean hey, fake it till you make it gl. It's especially not surprising since I'm considering the fact that either both of them are innocent or both of them are evil. But not in between. But with you suspicious of them I'm leaning towards innocent. Agreed. Idk what this whole "fictional scenario" thing is you're talking about but I agree. Except for the point finger thing. I didn't do any of that. I actually did the opposite and tried to rally everyone against voting for PK and Venture. Tony was blatant. Still is. I called him out on it. But that's for a later cycle. I wish I hadn't responded at all instead of replying to Mail's obvious taunts. My fault, I thought he was actually trying to bring up valid points. Now that I look back on it, it was glaringly obvious he was trying to get me to respond to rack up more votes. That piled on with people just voting for me because I was responding angrily to Mail just made me more angry. (Which I only see now) (When I was reading the thread yesterday it wasn't as obvious how mad I was sorry for that) (I thought people were legitimately voting for me with no reasoning) Perpetual cycles of emotion are somethings I like to avoid.
  7. Hellscythe
    I was actually planning on it if I lived to the next day. Voting on you today would do nothing. Nothing was secret. I had been putting white text in almost every post. I expected everyone to read it. Purposefully. I don't believe your false intent and still think you're a Diagrammist giving an excuse as to why you could bandwagon. My best hope at this point is that once I'm scanned and the scholars find that I'm well exactly what I said I am they'll look back at you. Apparently nobody else likes the idea of attacking Honey Badger and Venture Mistborn only has one post so he might as well be just as inactive. I would respond to Feligon's accusations but they don't exist. I also find it odd that Mail would say he is take his vote off me publicly then not actually Green out my name.o
  8. Hellscythe
    I'll just move it down here I'll be honest Clanky I didn't see your second post asking me why I changed Wilson's wording. The reason behind it was to get to (like she said) The Point. That part of the quote had nothing to do with what I was trying to get across. Unless you really do believe she rerolled because there wasn't an Explorer on the evil team then I have no hope. I had nothing to do with the "rerolls" and didn't want people(phattemer) saying well.... Exactly what he said. A whole lot of flawed logic. I still don't understand it. I just wanna explore. *clicks heels* I just wanna explore. *clicks heels* I just wanna explore. *clicks heels* So yes Clanky, it was to make people avoid that part her message. Not necessarily to benefit me, and hope you would all forget that Wilson said something else that could potentially damnation me with evidence, but to stop the illogical thoughts from running around. If you think that's suspicious that's fine and a valid reason to vote. I just want a real reason. You have been the best at giving a reason for voting. Thank you for that.
  9. Hellscythe
    Sorry you probably didn't get my reply to that in the midst of all the sarcasm. "Wilson didn't stick with the first roll because there weren't enough Explorers on the Diagrammist team." There is absolutely no reason for Wilson to role distribute differently because there weren't enough Explorers on the Diagrammist team. If I do end up dying I left my Captain with all of my suspicions, role, alignment, and position. Do what you will with it. If I was an Elsecaller it'd be different because they have an ability that's really only useful to the Diagrammists, but I already essentially proved I'm not an Elsecaller by explaining why Wilson postponed the rule change. Edit: I'll be honest Clanky I didn't see your second post asking me why I changed Wilson's wording. The reason behind it was to get to (like she said) The point. That part of the quote had nothing to do with what I was trying to get across. Unless you really do believe she rerolled because there wasn't an Explorer on the evil team then I have no hope.
  10. Hellscythe
    I would "procure a solid defense" if someone would give me a valid reason as to why they think I should be lynched. All I've gotten is "Uhh well your role isn't useful enough" "Uhh well on a scale of a 100 you're like a 78. No reason. Just a 78 cause I said so" "Uhh well the evil team is more likely to have an Explorer because I say so" "Uhh well you can't defend yourself against these indefensible accusations" "Uhh well you're probably NOT the most likely candidate for a Cook even though you say you are therefore you must be bad" Also that was the most obvious Diagrammist bandwagon Tony Shark. If you're willing to look for something for me to defend myself against I'm all for it. But I have tried. It's not easy to find.
  11. Hellscythe
    Wow Ok Adavantos. Your role is useless to the town too! So take that. Although this should be expected as you have a habit of voting to lynch people because their roles "aren't useful enough to the village" (referring to you lynching Creccio when he was a Biochromancer because his role wasn't "useful enough") In the case that I do actually die I'm a GB ,Explorer , Regular, Town
  12. Hellscythe
    I agree with Paranoid King on Venture Mistborn. Can we get a new candidate up for the lynching? I don't like these three anymore. If PK were really a Diagrammist he'd do everything he could to get the person he just tried to kill, lynched not take his vote off them and give a reason as to why they're innocent. Especially since he's also in the running next to him for the lynch. As much as I would love the other candidates to be lynched instead of me the other two candidates seem unlikely to be evil all of a sudden and I don't really want to die plus I know I'm not evil. How about polking or Honey Badger? Who is with me! *raises fist of triumph* We still have 10ish hours to fix our votes! We can do this town!
  13. Hellscythe
    Thank you for the vote tally. I don't think my vote is doing any good on Starry Smite so I'll go with the three candidates. I'm obviously not going to vote for myself, and I've looked through the evidence on PK and it isn't damning enough to me. Venture however is on the same level of inactivity as Starry Smite and just as suspicious to me as PK. While I (as I said before) am not convinced that it was a WGG in any way because I would've protected him had I been a surgeon, it's entirely possible. It's just not MORE possible than anyone else JUST because it was Venture.
  14. Hellscythe
    At least your reason for voting for me will have some logic behind it. I'm ok with being voted for so long as you have an actual reason. edit: Honestly with how much attention I brought to myself day one I'm surprised people are suspicious of me at all. This surprise is half due to the fact that I haven't been given a sound reason for being voted for.
  15. Hellscythe
    Thank you Kynedath.
  16. Hellscythe
    Yes. Wilson didn't stick with the first roll because there weren't enough Explorers on the Diagrammist team. That's exactly it. You're all genius'. You got me, I'm a Diagrammist. How did you know all along? Gee golly I've been outsmarted.
  17. Hellscythe
    *sigh*
  18. Hellscythe
    If you agree with me then vote for them and I'll join you I was planning on doing the same the the last cycle. But at this point it seems like I'm the only one who wants to attack the inactives at all. I understand why you all think Starry is a bad idea, but that doesn't change my vote until another inactive is voted on. There's no reason to change my vote. "added to that the fact that a Diagrammist EC/Explorer is likely" - This just makes me angry like is he serious?
  19. Hellscythe
    Yes? I just picked one and stuck with it? Why pick a different one? I didn't even know Starry was new nor does it necessarily matter. I didn't see any posts until Mail even mentioned they posted today. I agree other people who have a history of being active should be posting but focusing our attention on me and not on them isn't doing anything about the situation.
  20. Hellscythe
    Not really? I already answered "Why Starry?" edit: @Shallan There's a bandwagon because..... because I got attacked? Yeah that makes sense. Actually now that I'm rereading the votes there's been no reasoning behind any of the votes other than maybe Clanky for not liking the contribution crusade? Or maybe Clanky doesn't know why I singled out Starry? Which is probably valid because I don't know why I picked Starry either. There wasn't any methodical choosing amongst a group of people who haven't posted. "I don't see Hellscythe as a legitimate target for a cook" - Zas "My main suspicions now are Hellscythe and Bort, who'd be at about 75" - Mail
  21. Hellscythe
    When I was looking at the list of names Elbereth posted I chose Starry Smite. For no reason at all. It could've been any one of those people. I just chose Starry Smite. I don't see a problem with that though. They're all the same. Why do I have to have a reason why I singled out one of them? I can't vote for all of them or else I would. I'm the suspicious one for being attacked by the Cook now?! What has the world come to. Also PK like I said in my post I disagree that it's our best source of info. I would agree in a normal game, but like you already said it's going to take forever to get information that I'm not counting on to wait for only to be potentially false. Our best source of info in my opinion is to get people talking about who their suspicions are and catch someone slipping.
  22. Hellscythe
    I agree information is key in this game. Unfortunately due to the rules there is next to none. And anything we can gather with our scholars has the potential to be false. Before this cycle there wasn't even more than 2-5 people able to use PM's. And the way we're going to get any information is from calling out the people who aren't giving us any information whatsoever and sitting in the background watching us vote for each other safely from behind the non-posting wall of secrecy like Starry Smite who, by the way, I'm still voting for adamantly. I agree we need information. *cough* Restares/Theidakar *cough* I disagree on the way to obtain information. Edit: I wonder what happens if two Elsecallers use their ability on the same dead person.... Whose takes precedence?
  23. Hellscythe
    Unfortunately the gap begins and ends with the fact that Elsecallers have the possibility of still existing, Adavantos. With Elsecallers the Scholars are essentially useless in the fact that not only can WE not trust their reads on dead players, but even THEY can't trust their own findings! I'm not saying the Diagrammists should be underestimated every cycle or every game. I'm saying I was one step ahead of them last cycle even if I wasn't a surgeon. Which was only proven by the attack. Also since you insist here's a larger "sample size" for you Mail.
  24. Hellscythe
    I'm actually 1 for 2 in my games tyvm. Also you're not considering the fact that the Cook is Creccio, or Creccio-esque. i.e. Lost and has no idea who or what the Diagrammists are. If they had no better leads at the time the obvious choice was me due to "the fact that you drew so much attention to yourself" - Mail 2015
  25. Hellscythe
    Exactly. Nobody knew my role so therefore I COULD be a Knight Radiant on the Ghostbloods. And the potential for killing the enemy team's knight radiant would be almost too good to pass up. I actually had a greater chance than anyone else because nobody else had soft-claimed Ghostbloods yet. This post was posted at pi time. 3:14
×
×
  • Create New...