Blaze1616 he/him Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Hey, I need a little help with the annotaion reference template. I've got a few things that are cited in the warbreaker annotations, but some of them are in the part 2 or part 3 of the given chapter. I know the annotation ref works like this: {{annotation ref|wb|chapter=X}} but that will always link to Part 1. How do I link to part 2 or 3? I've tried: {{annotation ref|wb|chapter=X|part=2}} {{annotation ref|wb|part=2|chapter=X}} {{annotation ref|wb|2|chapter=X}} {{annotation ref|wb|chapter=X|2}} None of those have worked. Thanks for the help.
Meg Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 Here it is: {{annotation ref|wb|chapter=2-2}} --> Annotation for Warbreaker Chapter 2-2 {{annotation ref|wb|chapter=15-2|text=Warbreaker Chapter Fifteen Part 2}} --> Annotation for Warbreaker Chapter Fifteen Part 2 3
Meg Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 (edited) You're welcome. I didn't know, too, but I wanted to know. It took time but I figured out how it works. edit: typo Edited February 20, 2015 by Meg
Blaze1616 he/him Posted February 20, 2015 Author Posted February 20, 2015 You're welcome. I didn't know, too, but I wanted to know. It took time but I figured out how it works. edit: typo Out of curiosity, do you just try a bajillion different combinations until it works, or is there an actual way to look it up?
Meg Posted February 20, 2015 Posted February 20, 2015 (edited) In such cases the first thing is to try (and err ). Since I get bored if that doesn't work I would look for similarities or if I'm able to see kind of a scheme. This is how Meg works . Thus I'm sorry, I can't provide you with how exactly I did this. Edit and PS: Your post showed how it doesn't work so I hadn't to include those possibilities. And what made it quite more fascinating was the fact that I haven't done something on the wiki for a long time and some of the wiki-commands are replaced (so that making trouble). Edited February 20, 2015 by Meg
Joe ST he/him Posted February 21, 2015 Posted February 21, 2015 Ahhh, I'm sorry for not making this more obvious. I'm glad you've both figured it out but I should probably write it in the documentation more obviously huh? 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now