Honorless

Odium page, regarding Gavilar's assassination

6 posts in this topic

"On the day of a treaty between them and the Alethi, Odium used one of his voidspren to lead them to buy an assassin, Szeth, who was used when Eshonai found out that the Alethi king"

Ulim worked with Venli in secret, I do not recall any mention of him working with Eshonai or having a part in Gavilar's assassination

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that part is conjecture.  They think Ulim lead the five to Szeth.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a reference to hearing a voice that lead them to get Szeth. That's what that is referred to. 

Quote

Klade’s slave was an assassin. Klade claimed that a voice —speaking to the rhythms—had led him to the man, who had confessed his skills when pressed. Venli had apparently been with Klade, though Eshonai hadn’t seen her sister since earlier in the day.

You can change it so it's less explicitly referring to a Voidspren if you wish. I think there is an implication there.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, Chaos said:

There's a reference to hearing a voice that lead them to get Szeth. That's what that is referred to.

Quote

Klade’s slave was an assassin. Klade claimed that a voice —speaking to the rhythms—had led him to the man, who had confessed his skills when pressed. Venli had apparently been with Klade, though Eshonai hadn’t seen her sister since earlier in the day.

You can change it so it's less explicitly referring to a Voidspren if you wish. I think there is an implication there.

Thanks! Made a few minor edits on the page.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Chaos said:

You can change it so it's less explicitly referring to a Voidspren if you wish. I think there is an implication there.

It could also have been Odium himself, an Unmade, Nale or his spren.  We don't actually know.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Honorless Unless there is confirmation that it was Ulim in these cases, we aren't able to state it as explicitly as you've stated. I've reverted your edits for now, you're welcome to re-add with other wording, we just can't state this as fact currently unless it's been confirmed in book or wob. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.