Hello everyone! I preapologize for any typos, I'm waiting this on my phone.
I just finished Hero of Ages. This is only my second fantasy series that I have finished but I really liked it. It's possible that I just missed something because I listened through the audiobooks so quickly, but I feel like there's some holes I am having trouble plugging related the Rashek and Ruin, and trying to make sense out of what the Lord Ruler did with the power of preservation and what he did near the end of the final empire.
If you are able to shed some light on my questions, without including information from later books at all, that would be most helpful. I'm sure later books will help color and flesh out things further, but I just want the Misborn Era 1 understanding of what I feel like I'm missing.
I'm sure I can find answers to all my questions if I searched hard enough, but searching while avoiding spoilers is completely impossible. So I humbly request the help of real people in this thread.
I'm confused by a handful of things. Rashek is ultimately a good man per Sazed, but in the limited time he held the power he created extremely evil things (inquisitors which require slaughtering mistings and koloss which require killing 4 men each to make. Why would he have made these at all?
It mentions he created the kondra as spies against Ruin... but he made inquisitors and koloss first. kondra were created last, and are still 1000 years old... So inquisitors and koloss were made immediately basically. But ruin didn't have control of him to do this or he wouldn't have made kondra how he did afterwards.
If he tried so hard to breed feruchemy out of the population so no one would ever be a feruchemist and mistborn to challenge his power, why would he essentially create/enable/spread hemalurgy allowing people to do exactly that, become feruchemist and mistborn (like Marsh is revealed to be in hero of ages). That doesn't make sense.
Rashek still seemed to believe he was keeping ruin from destroying the world up to his death "...what I do for you". But Rashek was doing some horrible stuff. He intentionally altered people to be highly reproductive slaves, he tortured and killed many people, he held public executions, etc.
Was he supposedly just trying to create the most stable society possible so that he would still be alive and in power when the power returned to the well so he could right the wrongs best he could with 1000 years of experience?
Sorry this isn't a concise question or two. I'm just trying to wrap my head around how the Lord Ruler and ruin interpolated in Mistborn era 1 since I must have missed something. The Lord Ruler is probably my favorite villian ever in fiction. The oppressive, heavy burden of dread and hopelessness he made me feel in book 1 was so awesome, and to find out the big reveal at the end made him super interesting to me as an arc. I just don't want to be ultimately soured on him as a character because I'm missing plot points I assume Sanderson answered in era 1 already.
I probably have like 15 more questions, but this is already too long and winding. Thanks in advance for any help or clarification. I did just purchase A way of Kings, but that's a 47 hour audiobook and I want to mentally wrap up Mistborn before starting it.
Thanks!
TLDR: I don't get how Rashek is a "good man" but did all sorts of bad things (like create inquisitors and a permanent slave race) when he held the power, especially since he knew of Ruin and was supposedly trying to prevent him from destroying stuff. Please advise, and refer to my above ramblings for more specific questions I have about this.
Question
Rome
*** Please no spoilers beyond Misborn Era 1 ***
Hello everyone! I preapologize for any typos, I'm waiting this on my phone.
I just finished Hero of Ages. This is only my second fantasy series that I have finished but I really liked it. It's possible that I just missed something because I listened through the audiobooks so quickly, but I feel like there's some holes I am having trouble plugging related the Rashek and Ruin, and trying to make sense out of what the Lord Ruler did with the power of preservation and what he did near the end of the final empire.
If you are able to shed some light on my questions, without including information from later books at all, that would be most helpful. I'm sure later books will help color and flesh out things further, but I just want the Misborn Era 1 understanding of what I feel like I'm missing.
I'm sure I can find answers to all my questions if I searched hard enough, but searching while avoiding spoilers is completely impossible. So I humbly request the help of real people in this thread.
I'm confused by a handful of things. Rashek is ultimately a good man per Sazed, but in the limited time he held the power he created extremely evil things (inquisitors which require slaughtering mistings and koloss which require killing 4 men each to make. Why would he have made these at all?
It mentions he created the kondra as spies against Ruin... but he made inquisitors and koloss first. kondra were created last, and are still 1000 years old... So inquisitors and koloss were made immediately basically. But ruin didn't have control of him to do this or he wouldn't have made kondra how he did afterwards.
If he tried so hard to breed feruchemy out of the population so no one would ever be a feruchemist and mistborn to challenge his power, why would he essentially create/enable/spread hemalurgy allowing people to do exactly that, become feruchemist and mistborn (like Marsh is revealed to be in hero of ages). That doesn't make sense.
Rashek still seemed to believe he was keeping ruin from destroying the world up to his death "...what I do for you". But Rashek was doing some horrible stuff. He intentionally altered people to be highly reproductive slaves, he tortured and killed many people, he held public executions, etc.
Was he supposedly just trying to create the most stable society possible so that he would still be alive and in power when the power returned to the well so he could right the wrongs best he could with 1000 years of experience?
Sorry this isn't a concise question or two. I'm just trying to wrap my head around how the Lord Ruler and ruin interpolated in Mistborn era 1 since I must have missed something. The Lord Ruler is probably my favorite villian ever in fiction. The oppressive, heavy burden of dread and hopelessness he made me feel in book 1 was so awesome, and to find out the big reveal at the end made him super interesting to me as an arc. I just don't want to be ultimately soured on him as a character because I'm missing plot points I assume Sanderson answered in era 1 already.
I probably have like 15 more questions, but this is already too long and winding. Thanks in advance for any help or clarification. I did just purchase A way of Kings, but that's a 47 hour audiobook and I want to mentally wrap up Mistborn before starting it.
Thanks!
TLDR: I don't get how Rashek is a "good man" but did all sorts of bad things (like create inquisitors and a permanent slave race) when he held the power, especially since he knew of Ruin and was supposedly trying to prevent him from destroying stuff. Please advise, and refer to my above ramblings for more specific questions I have about this.
*** Please no spoilers beyond Misborn Era 1 ***
Link to comment
Share on other sites
13 answers to this question
Recommended Posts