xinoehp512 Posted October 12, 2019 Report Share Posted October 12, 2019 On 10/10/2019 at 9:12 PM, AonEne said: The majority changed to four with more players. Oh, that's what that means. I see. I vote yes, I suppose, which means it passes. But since it wasn't in effect when my earlier motion was raised, I'll make it again. I move that rules 1, 2, and 3 be declared as constant. I also move that a rule of inactivity be declared: players that have not posted on the Nomic thread within a period of 72 hours will be labeled 'inactive', and will only count halfway toward the total number of players for the purposes of determining a majority. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick Posted October 12, 2019 Report Share Posted October 12, 2019 2 hours ago, xinoehp512 said: Oh, that's what that means. I see. I vote yes, I suppose, which means it passes. But since it wasn't in effect when my earlier motion was raised, I'll make it again. I move that rules 1, 2, and 3 be declared as constant. I also move that a rule of inactivity be declared: players that have not posted on the Nomic thread within a period of 72 hours will be labeled 'inactive', and will only count halfway toward the total number of players for the purposes of determining a majority. I support all of this, as well as motioning that rules 4,5,6, constants rule should be constant 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatherTiempo Posted October 12, 2019 Report Share Posted October 12, 2019 I also support the above mentioned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xinoehp512 Posted October 14, 2019 Report Share Posted October 14, 2019 I vote yes for rules 5&6 to be constant. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brightness Warrior Posted October 14, 2019 Report Share Posted October 14, 2019 On 10/12/2019 at 2:00 PM, xinoehp512 said: I also move that a rule of inactivity be declared: players that have not posted on the Nomic thread within a period of 72 hours will be labeled 'inactive', and will only count halfway toward the total number of players for the purposes of determining a majority. I move for an amendment upon this rule, that the period of inactivity be extended to 5 days at least. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatherTiempo Posted October 21, 2019 Report Share Posted October 21, 2019 I would say that the rule of inactivity should remain three days, as it does not create permanent inactivity, and it only holds for the voting for said rules at those times of inactivity. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick Posted November 2, 2019 Report Share Posted November 2, 2019 rules 1,2,3,5, and 6 are now Constant 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatherTiempo Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 High Lord Squonky, that's me, motions that: Rule no. 7 THe first person to 1,000 points wins. Rule no. 8 If Rule no. 7 is passed, then composing a limerick that mentions some aspect of The Longest Thread, The Shortest Thread, CBST, Alleyverse, or The Last Post Wins gives you three points. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 I vote yes on both 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatherTiempo Posted November 15, 2019 Report Share Posted November 15, 2019 Hmmm what rhymes with withergeist? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xinoehp512 Posted November 17, 2019 Report Share Posted November 17, 2019 On 11/2/2019 at 1:52 AM, The Last Post said: rules 1,2,3,5, and 6 are now Constant Wait, didn't we only get three votes? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick Posted November 17, 2019 Report Share Posted November 17, 2019 2 hours ago, xinoehp512 said: Wait, didn't we only get three votes? like a month passed, they went inactive as players 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FatherTiempo Posted November 19, 2019 Report Share Posted November 19, 2019 (edited) Does anyone know the list of current players? Edited November 19, 2019 by FatherTiempo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AonEne Posted November 19, 2019 Report Share Posted November 19, 2019 I think that would be you, Stick, and Xino. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick Posted November 19, 2019 Report Share Posted November 19, 2019 Yep 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danex Posted July 12, 2020 Report Share Posted July 12, 2020 Hey, this looks fun! I propose that we bring this back and/or start a new thread and new game with nothing but the 3 original rules. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theTruthshaper Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 I'm in. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gears Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 Nomic! I love that game. If people are amenable to resurrecting it, I'll play. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xinoehp512 Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 I shall as well. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gears Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 In the future, to keep the game alive, we should divide the game into "Dynasties" [or rounds]. After a person wins, all added rules [but a scant few that are too beloved to repeal] are eliminated, and the game begins anew with the standard rules. Dynasty the first will begin when all players respond in the affirmative to the following [official] ruleset. New rules shall be made starting at index 301. https://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/nomic.htm#initial set 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xinoehp512 Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 I respond in the affirmative, and suggest a new thread be made. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gears Posted July 14, 2020 Report Share Posted July 14, 2020 1 minute ago, xinoehp512 said: I respond in the affirmative, and suggest a new thread be made. Affirmative. I shall create one posthaste. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channelknight Fadran Posted July 29, 2020 Report Share Posted July 29, 2020 I saw "democratic" and then I saw "wandering merchant." How do I become a democratic wandering merchant? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Doomstick Posted July 29, 2020 Report Share Posted July 29, 2020 Just now, Channelknight Fadran said: I saw "democratic" and then I saw "wandering merchant." How do I become a democratic wandering merchant? Sorry, but you can’t, as the new thread Has no wandering merchant rule 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Channelknight Fadran Posted July 29, 2020 Report Share Posted July 29, 2020 8 minutes ago, The Last Post said: Sorry, but you can’t, as the new thread Has no wandering merchant rule In that case, I propose a new law: To let me be a wandering merchant! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.