Xaladin Posted June 6, 2016 Report Share Posted June 6, 2016 The question is simple. How are Mark's crosses: crossing lines of forbiddance inside the small circles (which appear all over the novel) made? As soon as you draw one, you won't be able to cross it while drawing the other! Do you have to do it "ambidextrously" like Prof. Fitch? Or is it really 4 lines of forbiddance that meet in the middle? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jondesu Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 I thought it was stated you don't actually draw those, they're just included to help you see where the bind points should be. jW 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xaladin Posted June 7, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 I do not think so. See the Sumsion Defense. Here is a link. http://rithmatist.wikia.com/wiki/Rithmatic_Defenses?file=SumsionDefense.jpg Also compare Basic Easton with Advanced Easton. It looks a lot to me like the crosses that look like plus signs are indeed drawn. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jondesu Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 Hmm, you're right. Not sure exactly how that'd be done then, at least without adding either hassle or instability. jW 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaptainRyan Posted June 7, 2016 Report Share Posted June 7, 2016 It could be three LoFs, right? Draw the vertical one first and then do the left and right horizontal ones?1: | 2: --| 3: --|-- 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xaladin Posted June 8, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 8, 2016 (edited) That is one of the many almost satisfactory explanations I came up with. Probably the only explanation that will satisfy me would have to come from a WoB (or a sequel ) Edited June 8, 2016 by Xaladin 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shardlet Posted July 8, 2016 Report Share Posted July 8, 2016 I asked Brandon a series of questions about rithmatics. In a nutshell, this is the best answer I have to your question. Rithmatics was originally conceptualized as a cosmere magic system. This means that it is pretty close (but not bounded by and not completely consistent with) to the rules and features of cosmere magics. Specifically, Brandon said that intent is a key facet of rithmatics. This is pretty clear in some regards from reading the book (i.e., lines of revocation and the silencing line do not work if you draw them without intending to produce their rithmatic function). I asked Nrandon specifically about timing of effect in regards to lines of forbiddence and he said the timing of the effect generation depends upon the intent of the rithmatist drawing the line. My take away from this is that a rithmatist drawing a Mark's Cross would not intend for the lines of forbiddence to 'activate' until the second line had been completed. Thus, the first line would not produce an effect until the second line was drawn. 13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.