+Slowswift Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Astronomy is the definitely the best, in my opinion. There's just something about it that's so storming interesting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlion Blight Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 I know it's a long shot but does anyone here know a lot about the reductive TCA cycle? Biochemistry, huh? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clanky Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Biochemistry, huh? Yep, I'm majoring in Biochemistry. I've got a Metabolism assignment and midterm that I need to know this for. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KidWayne Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 I never learned how tp use Laplace Transforms.. hated them with my guts... I do like some stats and calc though My bane was the last third of Calculus 2 where you had to do series. I just didn't see the patterns the way some others seemed to have the ability to see. I maintain that the capability to express patterns as equations requires a level of abstract thought that should be regarded as a talent; I'm honestly not sure if mastery of that skill can be taught. I mean sure, if you made me do hours of these kinds of problems for several weeks, I could probably develop a basic competency; however, like musical talent, I don't think practice session grinding will ever produce a more-than-mediocre equation writer or musician. Also arcs drove me nuts. I could NOT grasp (still can't really) how an arc can be the same length as a line connecting two points. I remember getting so stuck on this that couldn't pay attention past that point to hear the rest of the lecture. It just contradicted the maxim of "the shortest distance between two points is a straight line." Any of you math geniuses able to offer a better explanation (of how an arc connecting two points can be the same length as a straight line connecting those same points) than, "Well, arcs can be the same length. That's just the way it is."? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasimir Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 If I never have to see the word 'Hamiltonian' again for the next month or so... I told my prof flatly, as I was going through the manuscript, "Look, I've checked everything except your Hamiltonians, okay? I can check your basic DEs, I can spend two hours going through German articles to see who on earth Claisen's co-discoverer of the Claisen rearrangement was, I can check everything else, but please don't ask me to check your Hamiltonians because I'm not trained and I have no idea even if there's a misprint." My prof said, very calmly, at the end of all that: "I never even expected you to check the mathematics. I know that's not your job." ...Sigh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kipper Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Cool! Is there a reason biology is not one of the tags? Are you one of the people that doesn't consider it a "real" science? All science is applied math or stamp collecting...It's awesome that everyone here seems to know a lot more calc than I do! Maybe there's a few tutors should I need one. I'm taking "Calculus w/Analytic Trigonometry and Geometry," which most of you would consider to be quite basic, from what I'm reading. Formal definition of limits, differentiation, curve sketching, optimization, related rates, etc. I just started learning integration in class today. So far it really hasn't been that hard, just time-consuming. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creccio Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 All science is applied math or stamp collecting... It's awesome that everyone here seems to know a lot more calc than I do! Maybe there's a few tutors should I need one. I'm taking "Calculus w/Analytic Trigonometry and Geometry," which most of you would consider to be quite basic, from what I'm reading. Formal definition of limits, differentiation, curve sketching, optimization, related rates, etc. I just started learning integration in class today. So far it really hasn't been that hard, just time-consuming. If you need help shoot me a PM 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haelbarde Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 I was bored in class so I decided to try to derive the cubic formula I worked out the general/algebraic form for the solution of the determinant of a 3x3 matrix once. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creccio Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 I worked out the general/algebraic form for the solution of the determinant of a 3x3 matrix once. Just once... right? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haelbarde Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Well sure. I wasn't going to rewrite out all the algebra to demonstrate it again (It's not quite as simple as the ad-bc form of a 2x2 determinant). And the thing itself was a bit big. So pro-tip: Just memorize the process of solving determinants of 3x3's. It's quicker, and then works for larger determinants. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creccio Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 How far into math are you Hael? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haelbarde Posted November 10, 2015 Report Share Posted November 10, 2015 Just about finished level 2 physics at university (I did '2nd year' over 2 years). So the maths that I've done has been the pre/co-requisites for the physics, primarily. Though my minor will be mathematics. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silverblade5 Posted November 11, 2015 Author Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 For those who care, tell me if this looks right for the cubic formula: ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 x=y-b/3a y^3+(c/a-b^2/3a^3)y+(2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a)=0 c/a-b^2/3a^2=p 2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a=q y^3+py+q=0 y=z-p/3z z^3-p^3/27z^3+q=0 (z^3)^2+qz^3-p^3/27 z=(-q/2+-(q^2/4+p^3/27)^1/2)^1/3 z simplified=((-108q+-12(12p^3+27q^2)^1/2)^1/3)/6 y=((2p^2(-108q+-12(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)^1/3)+((4(2p^3+27q^2+-3q(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2))^1/3(9q+-(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)))/12p^2 Still haven't managed to simplify when replacing p and q with a b c and d 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clanky Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 All science is applied math or stamp collecting... I used to be one of the people who considered Bio to not really be a science. But once I started doing my more advanced bio courses such as biotechnology and toxicology I have changed my opinion. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creccio Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 For those who care, tell me if this looks right for the cubic formula: ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 x=y-b/3a y^3+(c/a-b^2/3a^3)y+(2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a)=0 c/a-b^2/3a^2=p 2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a=q y^3+py+q=0 y=z-p/3z z^3-p^3/27z^3+q=0 (z^3)^2+qz^3-p^3/27 z=(-q/2+-(q^2/4+p^3/27)^1/2)^1/3 z simplified=((-108q+-12(12p^3+27q^2)^1/2)^1/3)/6 y=((2p^2(-108q+-12(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)^1/3)+((4(2p^3+27q^2+-3q(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2))^1/3(9q+-(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)))/12p^2 Still haven't managed to simplify when replacing p and q with a b c and d That looks nasty, it must be true. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kipper Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 I used to be one of the people who considered Bio to not really be a science. But once I started doing my more advanced bio courses such as biotechnology and toxicology I have changed my opinion.Oh, bio is definitely science. Don't disagree with you. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haelbarde Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 Sometimes I wish the Shard supported LaTeX or Mathprint, or some such thing that rendered maths stuff nicely... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxal Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 For those who care, tell me if this looks right for the cubic formula: ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0 x=y-b/3a y^3+(c/a-b^2/3a^3)y+(2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a)=0 c/a-b^2/3a^2=p 2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a=q y^3+py+q=0 y=z-p/3z z^3-p^3/27z^3+q=0 (z^3)^2+qz^3-p^3/27 z=(-q/2+-(q^2/4+p^3/27)^1/2)^1/3 z simplified=((-108q+-12(12p^3+27q^2)^1/2)^1/3)/6 y=((2p^2(-108q+-12(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)^1/3)+((4(2p^3+27q^2+-3q(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2))^1/3(9q+-(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)))/12p^2 Still haven't managed to simplify when replacing p and q with a b c and d There was a methodology for this kind of stuff, but I kinda forgot about it 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clanky Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 Oh, bio is definitely science. Don't disagree with you. I was more worried that you seemed to have something against stamp collecting. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Slowswift Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 I figured I'd elaborate on my earlier post. I love science. Astronomy is my favorite, psychology is really interesting, and I'd probably take physics if there wasn't so much darn math. You see, math isn't exactly my forte, which could cause... problems were I to ever seriously consider a scientific career. Probably why it's just a hobby. Also, mechanical engineering and architecture. Also involve math and science. Also awesome. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navybrandt Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 My bane was the last third of Calculus 2 where you had to do series. I just didn't see the patterns the way some others seemed to have the ability to see. I maintain that the capability to express patterns as equations requires a level of abstract thought that should be regarded as a talent; I'm honestly not sure if mastery of that skill can be taught. I mean sure, if you made me do hours of these kinds of problems for several weeks, I could probably develop a basic competency; however, like musical talent, I don't think practice session grinding will ever produce a more-than-mediocre equation writer or musician. Also arcs drove me nuts. I could NOT grasp (still can't really) how an arc can be the same length as a line connecting two points. I remember getting so stuck on this that couldn't pay attention past that point to hear the rest of the lecture. It just contradicted the maxim of "the shortest distance between two points is a straight line." Any of you math geniuses able to offer a better explanation (of how an arc connecting two points can be the same length as a straight line connecting those same points) than, "Well, arcs can be the same length. That's just the way it is."? Calculus 2 is the hardest math - especially with the stuff about Series thrown in there. It's like they couldn't find a good spot for it and there's not enough for a whole class on just Series, so they threw it in with Calculus 2. Once you get past that though, math gets much easier (granted, I haven't gone past differential equations). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
navybrandt Posted November 11, 2015 Report Share Posted November 11, 2015 BTW, this is my favorite formula. Does anybody else know what it is? Keff = η • ε • p • f • Lf • Lth 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mashadar Mistborn Posted November 13, 2015 Report Share Posted November 13, 2015 You know that you're a science/math geek when you finish a chemistry test early, so you start doing antiderivatives while you wait. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elbereth Posted November 13, 2015 Report Share Posted November 13, 2015 (edited) So we just did the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus today, which was cool. Also, for clarification, because my teacher isn't particularly good at explaining things: An antiderivative is the same thing as an indefinite integral, right? Why? Edited November 13, 2015 by Elbereth 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orlion Blight Posted November 13, 2015 Report Share Posted November 13, 2015 So we just did the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus today, which was cool. Also, for clarification, because my teacher isn't particularly good at explaining things: An antiderivative is the same thing as an indefinite integral, right? Why? Why not? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.