Jump to content

Math and science


Silverblade5

Recommended Posts

I never learned how tp use Laplace Transforms.. hated them with my guts...

 

I do like some stats and calc though :)

My bane was the last third of Calculus 2 where you had to do series. I just didn't see the patterns the way some others seemed to have the ability to see. I maintain that the capability to express patterns as equations requires a level of abstract thought that should be regarded as a talent; I'm honestly not sure if mastery of that skill can be taught. I mean sure, if you made me do hours of these kinds of problems for several weeks, I could probably develop a basic competency; however, like musical talent, I don't think practice session grinding will ever produce a more-than-mediocre equation writer or musician.

Also arcs drove me nuts. I could NOT grasp (still can't really) how an arc can be the same length as a line connecting two points. I remember getting so stuck on this that couldn't pay attention past that point to hear the rest of the lecture. It just contradicted the maxim of "the shortest distance between two points is a straight line."

Any of you math geniuses able to offer a better explanation (of how an arc connecting two points can be the same length as a straight line connecting those same points) than, "Well, arcs can be the same length. That's just the way it is."?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I never have to see the word 'Hamiltonian' again for the next month or so...
 
I told my prof flatly, as I was going through the manuscript, "Look, I've checked everything except your Hamiltonians, okay? I can check your basic DEs, I can spend two hours going through German articles to see who on earth Claisen's co-discoverer of the Claisen rearrangement was, I can check everything else, but please don't ask me to check your Hamiltonians because I'm not trained and I have no idea even if there's a misprint."
 
My prof said, very calmly, at the end of all that: "I never even expected you to check the mathematics. I know that's not your job."
 
...Sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool!

Is there a reason biology is not one of the tags? Are you one of the people that doesn't consider it a "real" science? :huh:

All science is applied math or stamp collecting...

It's awesome that everyone here seems to know a lot more calc than I do! Maybe there's a few tutors should I need one. I'm taking "Calculus w/Analytic Trigonometry and Geometry," which most of you would consider to be quite basic, from what I'm reading. Formal definition of limits, differentiation, curve sketching, optimization, related rates, etc. I just started learning integration in class today.

So far it really hasn't been that hard, just time-consuming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All science is applied math or stamp collecting...

It's awesome that everyone here seems to know a lot more calc than I do! Maybe there's a few tutors should I need one. I'm taking "Calculus w/Analytic Trigonometry and Geometry," which most of you would consider to be quite basic, from what I'm reading. Formal definition of limits, differentiation, curve sketching, optimization, related rates, etc. I just started learning integration in class today.

So far it really hasn't been that hard, just time-consuming.

 

If you need help shoot me a PM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well sure. I wasn't going to rewrite out all the algebra to demonstrate it again (It's not quite as simple as the ad-bc form of a 2x2 determinant). And the thing itself was a bit big. So pro-tip: Just memorize the process of solving determinants of 3x3's. It's quicker, and then works for larger determinants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who care, tell me if this looks right for the cubic formula:

 

ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0

x=y-b/3a

y^3+(c/a-b^2/3a^3)y+(2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a)=0

c/a-b^2/3a^2=p

2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a=q

y^3+py+q=0

y=z-p/3z

z^3-p^3/27z^3+q=0

(z^3)^2+qz^3-p^3/27

z=(-q/2+-(q^2/4+p^3/27)^1/2)^1/3

z simplified=((-108q+-12(12p^3+27q^2)^1/2)^1/3)/6

y=((2p^2(-108q+-12(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)^1/3)+((4(2p^3+27q^2+-3q(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2))^1/3(9q+-(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)))/12p^2

 

Still haven't managed to simplify when replacing p and q with a b c and d :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All science is applied math or stamp collecting...

 

 

I used to be one of the people who considered Bio to not really be a science. But once I started doing my more advanced bio courses such as biotechnology and toxicology I have changed my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who care, tell me if this looks right for the cubic formula:

 

ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0

x=y-b/3a

y^3+(c/a-b^2/3a^3)y+(2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a)=0

c/a-b^2/3a^2=p

2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a=q

y^3+py+q=0

y=z-p/3z

z^3-p^3/27z^3+q=0

(z^3)^2+qz^3-p^3/27

z=(-q/2+-(q^2/4+p^3/27)^1/2)^1/3

z simplified=((-108q+-12(12p^3+27q^2)^1/2)^1/3)/6

y=((2p^2(-108q+-12(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)^1/3)+((4(2p^3+27q^2+-3q(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2))^1/3(9q+-(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)))/12p^2

 

Still haven't managed to simplify when replacing p and q with a b c and d :P

 

That looks nasty, it must be true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to be one of the people who considered Bio to not really be a science. But once I started doing my more advanced bio courses such as biotechnology and toxicology I have changed my opinion.

Oh, bio is definitely science. Don't disagree with you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those who care, tell me if this looks right for the cubic formula:

 

ax^3+bx^2+cx+d=0

x=y-b/3a

y^3+(c/a-b^2/3a^3)y+(2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a)=0

c/a-b^2/3a^2=p

2b^3/27a^3-bc/3a^3+d/a=q

y^3+py+q=0

y=z-p/3z

z^3-p^3/27z^3+q=0

(z^3)^2+qz^3-p^3/27

z=(-q/2+-(q^2/4+p^3/27)^1/2)^1/3

z simplified=((-108q+-12(12p^3+27q^2)^1/2)^1/3)/6

y=((2p^2(-108q+-12(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)^1/3)+((4(2p^3+27q^2+-3q(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2))^1/3(9q+-(12p^3+81q^2)^1/2)))/12p^2

 

Still haven't managed to simplify when replacing p and q with a b c and d :P

 

There was a methodology for this kind of stuff, but I kinda forgot about it  :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I figured I'd elaborate on my earlier post. I love science. Astronomy is my favorite, psychology is really interesting, and I'd probably take physics if there wasn't so much darn math. You see, math isn't exactly my forte, which could cause... problems were I to ever seriously consider a scientific career. Probably why it's just a hobby. :P

Also, mechanical engineering and architecture. Also involve math and science. Also awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My bane was the last third of Calculus 2 where you had to do series. I just didn't see the patterns the way some others seemed to have the ability to see. I maintain that the capability to express patterns as equations requires a level of abstract thought that should be regarded as a talent; I'm honestly not sure if mastery of that skill can be taught. I mean sure, if you made me do hours of these kinds of problems for several weeks, I could probably develop a basic competency; however, like musical talent, I don't think practice session grinding will ever produce a more-than-mediocre equation writer or musician.

Also arcs drove me nuts. I could NOT grasp (still can't really) how an arc can be the same length as a line connecting two points. I remember getting so stuck on this that couldn't pay attention past that point to hear the rest of the lecture. It just contradicted the maxim of "the shortest distance between two points is a straight line."

Any of you math geniuses able to offer a better explanation (of how an arc connecting two points can be the same length as a straight line connecting those same points) than, "Well, arcs can be the same length. That's just the way it is."?

Calculus 2 is the hardest math - especially with the stuff about Series thrown in there. It's like they couldn't find a good spot for it and there's not enough for a whole class on just Series, so they threw it in with Calculus 2. Once you get past that though, math gets much easier (granted, I haven't gone past differential equations).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we just did the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus today, which was cool. Also, for clarification, because my teacher isn't particularly good at explaining things: An antiderivative is the same thing as an indefinite integral, right? Why?

Edited by Elbereth
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...