Posted February 3 Insert obligatory "bro what" here 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Just now, Shining Silhouette said: Insert obligatory "bro what" here TBH I did expect Drake was doing a gambit here to see who believed it and who didn't. So I'm not really mad 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 16 minutes ago, Amanuensis said: Steeldancer Walin Last VC: Current VC: Wouldn't mind if Sart was up for the running either, maybe if @Araris Valerian and @Channelknight Fadran are willing to vote there What are we expecting to change that would prevent a tie at rollover? Dannex had a role that gave them the net alignment of all voters involved in a tie, which I now have this cycle. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 19 minutes ago, Amanuensis said: Steeldancer Walin Last VC: Current VC: Wouldn't mind if Sart was up for the running either, maybe if @Araris Valerian and @Channelknight Fadran are willing to vote there Hm? Hello? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 2 hours ago, Amanuensis said: Out of curiosity, does the term Terminal Seeker have a history in SE like Goalkeeper? There's also LG74, where the Village complained I didn't give them a Seeker and I pointed to their Coinshot. New Tallybot votecount: Quote Vote Tally Walin (4): Amanuensis, Matrim's Dice, Shining Silhouette, |TJ| Steeldancer (4): Archer, Ashbringer, DrakeMarshall, The Wandering Wizard Shining Silhouette (2): Araris Valerian, Channelknight Fadran Araris Valerian (1): The Bookwyrm I manually added Fadran, but please let me know if Fadran missed anyone else! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Look at that. Already missing me in the vote counts. The only one who knows about your plot to incite a civil war, thus completing the necessary blood seal to finish the nationwide transmutation circle in order to create the world's largest philosopher's stone and attain God. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Is there any reason we want to see Sart’s alignment over Shining’s? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 1 minute ago, Channelknight Fadran said: Look at that. Already missing me in the vote counts. The only one who knows about your plot to incite a civil war, thus completing the necessary blood seal to finish the nationwide transmutation circle in order to create the world's largest philosopher's stone and attain God. Tallybot doesn't like you, man By the way, out of personal curiosity, what browser are you using? This doesn't change much as I can't fix Tallybot but I'm curious why you, Bookwyrm at one point, Tani, and Orlok have had posts with <font> tags and am wondering if we can reproduce the issue. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 (edited) 25 minutes ago, Orlok Tsubodai said: What are we expecting to change that would prevent a tie at rollover? Dannex had a role that gave them the net alignment of all voters involved in a tie, which I now have this cycle. We at least know of the Stab Voter role which adds an extra vote if you don't move your vote on a player from Rollovet to Rollover, so possible the elims have one of those. We haven't seen or heard of any other kind of vote manip, tho I wouldn't be surprised if one/more existed @dannnnnex are you willing to verify this? What does net alignment mean, exactly? Like, if the turn ended now and the current vote randed, you would know there were like, 2 elims and 6 villagers among the 8 voters? ED1T: 12 minutes ago, Araris Valerian said: Is there any reason we want to see Sart’s alignment over Shining’s? I assume you don't mean by executing But yes. If Sart were somehow a verified elim, we'd probably know the elims have no Goalkeepers and could work from there Edited February 3 by Amanuensis 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Wouldn't you like to know, weatherboy I'm using Google Chrome. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 (edited) when I took over for Stick, it was clearly mid-gambit, and I had no idea what to do or what stick wanted well, you know me my fight or flyte response is to gambit harder things got out of hand on the bright side, I accidentally did a reaction test! So let's all just agree to pretend that's what I planned all along Preliminary findings: people who specifically posted about being surprised and/or confused by the "Stick shot TKN" claim: Ashbringer (here and here) Shining (sort of) Aman (a lot, not gonna link every one) TJ (delayed) TKN Fadran (slightly different from the rest, "why did the elims kill Xino?" instead of "why did Stick kill TKN?") people who posted demonstrating awareness of and engagement with the "Stick shot TKN" thesis but didn't particularly express surprise or confusion: Wizard TJ (initial) Devotary Archer people who were reasonably online and active, but did not have anything to say about it: Araris Matrim Randby Xino, interestingly enough Happy hunting Edited February 3 by DrakeMarshall Archer self-reported >:P 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 To clarify, you shot Xino instead? Or did something else happen. Also ties Orlok what 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 7 minutes ago, DrakeMarshall said: people who posted demonstrating awareness of and engagement with the "Stick shot TKN" thesis but didn't particularly express surprise or confusion: Wizard So you haven't killed anyone? No one at all? 57 minutes ago, Orlok Tsubodai said: What are we expecting to change that would prevent a tie at rollover? Dannex had a role that gave them the net alignment of all voters involved in a tie, which I now have this cycle. And how do we not know this is a gambit/plan to control the outcome of the vote? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 I didn't shoot nobody, I'm a pacifist!! I have undertaken a strict hippocratic oath. I shall not rest until the current government is overthrown and a hippocracy is instituted instead. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Just now, DrakeMarshall said: I didn't shoot nobody, I'm a pacifist!! I have undertaken a strict hippocratic oath. I shall not rest until the current government is overthrown and a hippocracy is instituted instead. Was Stick responsible for the Tani and Xino kills, then? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Just now, Amanuensis said: Was Stick responsible for the Tani and Xino kills, then? Yes 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Welp, I don't have enough time today to do more than lightly skim the past few days of the thread. From what I remember of my last quick skim, I was asked who I Trolled. Well, I forgot to do it on N2, but I trolled Aman N1--and iirc he became immune to Trolling for the next cycle (which is in the role description of Trolls, and would have worked that way if he was Trolling himself), or something? I won't make any promises about reading and analyzing through the cycles I missed; I probably will post only this time during the cycle and get back online in about 10 hours from now, so after rollover. Welp. I looked through all my pings; sorry, @Amanuensis. I never Trolled Bookwyrm. I can Troll Wiz N3 or Bookwyrm this time, if you want. (Please tag or quote me in your reply in case I can't scroll through the thread) No votes on the incumbent or the unincumbents, as I haven't heard their platforms yet. GL to Steel in the finals of D3! ---------- Walin may have done something interesting. He also may have not. What, you were expecting me to pay attention and write it down for your own amusement? Oh, you were? Wait...oh, yeah, I said I would do that. My bad. Maybe next time. ---------- I award myself 0.1 XP 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 4 minutes ago, DrakeMarshall said: Yes That makes so much more sense, because Stick doesn't kill TKN for reading him how she did. You however were part of the massive Alv paranoia 3 minutes ago, Walin said: Welp. I looked through all my pings; sorry, @Amanuensis. I never Trolled Bookwyrm. I can Troll Wiz N3 or Bookwyrm this time, if you want. (Please tag or quote me in your reply in case I can't scroll through the thread) NO! PLEASE DON'T TROLL ME I LIKE MY PMS! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Alright then. If we're going for a mass clear tie via Orlok, I'd be partial for getting a third player up there. But there is a decent chance some things disrupt other things. And we'd need a bit more votes. 4 with 4 votes each would be great. I do have some reason to believe pulling that off will be tricky, though. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 (edited) 10 minutes ago, Walin said: I won't make any promises about reading and analyzing through the cycles I missed Don't worry, you know what's going on about as much as the rest of us On that note, I think I must have missed the part where somebody explained why we're switching to voting for Walin edited to add: 5 minutes ago, The Wandering Wizard said: That makes so much more sense, because Stick doesn't kill TKN for reading him how she did. You however were part of the massive Alv paranoia Alv paranoia? Edited February 3 by DrakeMarshall 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 1 hour ago, DrakeMarshall said: :joy: I uh, may not have been entirely frank I am, after all, Drake. Frank is clearly absent from this game. You could say that it’s possible for somebody to be Frank undercover but then that wouldn’t be frank so I rest my case. Nobody is frank. Anyway, the point is, Stick didn’t shoot TKN that might have been a very minor fib ...WHAT! 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 2 minutes ago, DrakeMarshall said: Don't worry, you know what's going on about as much as the rest of us On that note, I think I must have missed the part where somebody explained why we're switching to voting for Walin Think this is a part of it: 1 hour ago, Orlok Tsubodai said: What are we expecting to change that would prevent a tie at rollover? Dannex had a role that gave them the net alignment of all voters involved in a tie, which I now have this cycle. Although Shining and Aman switched before. Can't tell if that's Aman being Aman and having prescience or just PMs, or just pushing Walin. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Okay, I think that makes sense. I'm now really curious about the number of alignment obfuscating roles there are in this game, but it seems likely that we'll get some level of info from this. Shining, Sart. 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 2 minutes ago, The Known Novel said: ...WHAT! rumors that I killed you were greatly exaggerated 1 minute ago, Ashbringer said: Think this is a part of it: Although Shining and Aman switched before. Can't tell if that's Aman being Aman and having prescience or just PMs, or just pushing Walin. ok yes this explains why we're making a tie /kind of/ Orlok pushing for a tie feels amiss somehow but why Walin? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted February 3 Just now, DrakeMarshall said: but why Walin? Probably because he already had votes. What does 'net alignment' mean in this case? 0 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
