• Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bnaya

  1. Minor spoiler, just about the timeline and expectations
  2. that was Rushur Kris, the artist and master artifabrian. When had he arrived? Who had invited him. RoW prologue. Its probably him.
  3. A couple things I have noticed when reading the transcripted prologue- 1. "The Stormfather could lie? "Restares," Gavilar whispered. "Is he...?" Yᴇs. Hᴇ's ᴀ Hᴇʀᴀʟᴅ. Gavilar felt cold, as if he were standing in the highstorm, ice seeping through his skin and seeking his heart. Those eyes... "What are you," Gavilar whispered, hoarse. Tʜᴇ ʙɪɢɢᴇsᴛ ғᴏᴏʟ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴇᴍ ᴀʟʟ, the Stormfather said, ᴀɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʜᴀs ᴍɪsᴄᴀʟᴄᴜʟᴀᴛᴇᴅ. Gᴏᴏᴅʙʏᴇ, Gᴀᴠɪʟᴀʀ. I ʜᴀᴠᴇ sᴇᴇɴ ᴀ ɢʟɪᴍᴘsᴇ ᴏғ ᴡʜᴀᴛ ɪs ᴄᴏᴍɪɴɢ, ᴀɴᴅ I ᴡɪʟʟ ɴᴏᴛ ᴘʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ ɪᴛ." I think it imply that the stormfaker is one of the heralds, probably Ishar. 2. "No, no, no," Restares said, uncharacteristically firm. "That's not how you were supposed to do this. I wanted the honor of men to return; I wanted us to explore what made those Radiants so grand, before things went wrong." He ran his hand through his thinning hair. "Before I... I made them go wrong." It sound like Kelek was responsible for the recreance. 3. "Aɴᴅ ᴛʜᴇɴ sʜᴇ ғᴇʟʟ. Sʜᴇ ᴡᴀs ᴛᴏᴏ sᴍᴀʟʟ ᴀ ʙᴇɪɴɢ, ɴᴏᴛ sᴛʀᴏɴɢ ᴇɴᴏᴜɢʜ ᴛᴏ ᴜᴘʜᴏʟᴅ ᴀɴ ᴇɴᴛɪʀᴇ ᴘᴇᴏᴘʟᴇ. Iᴛ ᴀʟʟ ᴄᴀᴍᴇ ᴄʀᴀsʜɪɴɢ ᴅᴏᴡɴ. Aɴᴅ sᴏ, sᴏᴍᴇ ʙʀᴀᴠᴇ ᴍᴇɴ ᴀɴᴅ ᴡᴏᴍᴇɴ, Rᴀᴅɪᴀɴᴛs, ᴅɪᴅ sᴏᴍᴇᴛʜɪɴɢ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ʜᴀᴅ ᴛᴏ ʙᴇ ᴅᴏɴᴇ: ᴛʀᴀᴘᴘɪɴɢ Mɪsʜʀᴀᴍ ɪɴ ᴀ ɢᴇᴍsᴛᴏɴᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴘʀᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ ʜᴇʀ ғʀᴏᴍ ᴅᴇsᴛʀᴏʏɪɴɢ ᴀʟʟ ᴏғ Rᴏsʜᴀʀ. Tʜᴇ sɪᴅᴇ ᴇғғᴇᴄᴛ ᴏғ ᴛʜᴀᴛ ᴇᴠᴇɴᴛ ᴄʀᴇᴀᴛᴇᴅ ᴛʜᴇ ᴘᴀʀsʜᴍᴇɴ" the words of the stormfaker. If we believe him, mishram fail not because of the radiants. She fail on her own and was about to cause damage to all roshar so the radiants trap her. Maybe its implying she is the spren of roshar like someone suggested. Also: "Ba-Ado-Mishram. Granter of forms. Their other god. The one who could rival him. The one we betrayed." restares words. I think it curios, and implying she could rival odium! And why Kelek think about it as a betrayal?
  4. Yes, but he is scared of social relationships, and he is doing all day things he dont want to. You're right he is brave in other things like confronting nightmares, but I mean social backbone.
  5. Good theory! Always like something fresh, and its just fun to make theories! As to your theory on the ideals. My understanding as of now of the oaths, is that they are MADE by honor and cultivation. Honor for the binding, the part of them that is law, and Cultivation for the progress- you achieve them one after another, as you grow as a person and align to these ideals. Surgebinding at whole is of honor and cultivation, the vitality of them from cultivation and then Honor made them into laws of nature. So if I'm right, Odium isn't connected to surgebinding and Oaths, his is the infamous Voidbinding. The Fused are probably using corrupted surgebinidng, and are still a mystery, how they work and why Odium didn't give them voidbinding. Go ahead, and post your theories as they come! Don't be intimidated by anyone. (My english isn't good either [I've learned english mostly from Sanderson books] so I hope I'm understandable)
  6. Oh! Lol if you think about that, its definitely seem like cenn is the protagonist of the story on first read. Brandon's choice to introduce Kaladin through the eyes of another is very curious. As the book go on, it's become clear what's going on. It's just so fun to read your comments @Amira! You're great. And go ahead, the book is definitely worth it. I read this book 4 times I think and it's a great exprience every time
  7. Sp#4 -I'm super interested at the cosmere story as a whole. So if I need to pick only one, I will pick this, even if the story itself is less entertaining. Sp#3- Yumi and Painter are great. Love stories about talented guys without a backbone. Sp#1- the story itself won't win sp#2, but the aethers are just so interesting! Sp#2- realy great story, love the exploration, but in the light of the other secret projects, this is my last.
  8. Imo, the sentence is about the people who come to the inn, who learned that Design specific body isn't real. Not the people of the cosmere who learned something about cognitive entities.. what made you to think it is connected to ishar experiments?
  9. "It was, instead, about gloves" I know its not the wittiest phrase, but its manage to make me smile broadly even before i read the explanation. Its remind me of Mat Cauthon "boots" from brando's Wot(maybe towers of midnight?) And i love it!
  10. @KaladinWorldsinger Thanks!
  11. So, its pretty much confirmed in chapter 1 of sp1 to be a cup...
  12. Oh, of course the aethers are moons! Like aristotle fifth type of substance
  13. Wait, he read them already? Where can i watch that?
  14. You called that decent draft!? It's fantastic! I think the introduction is really marvelous and the chapters are amazing, the introduction is more to my liking, because I don't like reading a summary along my book, just introduction before. But it's amazing nonetheless.
  15. Sorry to interrupt, but don't Dominion is of the elantrians and Devotion of the derethi? ”merciful domi" etc. Edit:turn out my assumption was wrong: BrandonColevander Are [Jaddeth] & [Domi] the Shards Dominion & Devotion? Peter Ahlstrom Domi is more Devotion and Jaddeth is more Dominion. But there is some mixing. The shard holders were Aona and Skai. General Twitter 2015 (Feb. 19, 2015)
  16. Sorry for the resurrection of that thread:) I agree with @robardin that he was under Unmade's influence. And I think we should read Unmade's influence in most cases like Turnings in WoT, when those strong enough can resist it (like Logain) and those not strong enough (like almost all others) should be considered under compulsive influence and be judged in accordance to it. In Stormlight, we cannot judge the Alethi and Vedens because the influence of the Thrill (there are some leeway in that statement because it seems that they can choose sometimes, and it seems Sadeas can choose). And cannot judge the people of Kholinar who succumb to Ashertmarn. We CAN judge Amaram and his soldiers, and Aesudan because they chose to be the nasty people they were even before the Thrill and the Voidspren took them. And in Amaram and Aesudan case I even think thay WERE strong enough to resist but chose otherwise. In Moash situation I don't think he was even influenced by unmade, he just chose to be free of his conscience. And if Kaladin was turning to Odium side, I think we could blame him too, because it's a matter of choice for him. The same for Dalinar the Latter. I think that early Dalinar don't have the power to resist. That is questionable, because it seems that he judge himself on his actions then. That's according to what I remember of the books. I could be wrong obviously. Apoint to Lin Davar credit, shallan thought about him in WoR chapter 45: "Shallan could remember a time when she’d rarely, if ever, seen him angry." So it was all after the incidence with shallan's mother. Can be just him reacting wring and not an unmade, guess we'll learn more as we learn about shallan's past.
  17. From chapter 45, when shallan see a parrot (chicken) that speaks: "Shallan jumped back. The word was mangled by the creature’s inhuman voice, but it was recognizable. “A Voidbringer!” she hissed, safehand to her chest. “An animal that speaks! You’ll bring the eyes of the Unmade upon us.” The merchant laughed. “These things live all over Shinovar, young lady. If their speech drew the Unmade, the entire country would be cursed!” Dear shallan, it seems that the unmade eyes were already upon you, and shinovar entire country...
  18. @Pathfinder I edited my post especially for you!
  19. The question to debate here is (IMHO of course) - do all things come from anywhere? If the answer is yes, you must make one exception that is the beginnings of all things. This is the greece's philosophers definition for god. And the logic behind that exception is - all the things that we know came from somewhere (pear from the tree, tree from the seed, etc), but we can't know the true nature of god, so he is the only one that can be an exception to that rule. (God is the wildcard, the ultimate stop to "rabbit holes". And now the point- jasna thinks that it is artificial solution, and therefore believe that either Allllll things need somewhere they come from and here you go to the rabbit hole because it is going to infinity or you can believe that not all things came from somewhere, just some of them, and some of them simply exist. It is not intuitive view, quite against it but the best she can believe in her opinion in conclusion of the Cosmologic argument. As for @Pathfinder I respect your respect for those who believe in god, but i think you don't need to be so sensitive (it's the right word? I mean one who dont want to insult other people). Theists can stand criticism (and if not it is a problem) and if you say your thoughts politely its okay in my opinion. Sorry about the language, I am not English speaker... Edit: just saw @Debarra reaction. So i want to clarify, i am theist myself, and study almost the whole day my religious beliefs, but i think we will gain more if we can debate things openly and don't worry too much about insulting. Of course we need to pay attention and don't insult and if it happened to apologize and do better but don't let it stop us from learning and debates.
  20. We got Evershore in the newsletter
  21. So, hebrew translations. I've read the books mostly in english because they are cheaper that way and it was wonderful way to work on my english. But I will wrote what I know. Shards: Preservation (english) | שימור [same meaning imo] Ruin (english)| הרס [same] Odium (english)| שנאה [=hatred] Honor (english)| כבוד [respect, honor] Cultivation (english)| טיפוח. [I guess it's fine, also mean taking shower or putting cream on the face..] Dominion | שררה. [More like ministry] Ambition | שאפתנות [exact translation] Knights radiants: Windrunners (english)| שועטי רוחות [wind = רוח. Gallop = שועט.] Skybreakers (english)| שוברי שחקים [break=שובר. In hebrew there are multiple words for sky. שחקים is a poetic one.] Dustbringers (english) | אבות אבק. [Dust fathers..] Edgedancers (english)| מרקדי קצוות. [It's edges, plural] Truthwatchers (english)| משגיחי אמת. [More like truth supervisers] Lightweavers (english)| אורגי אור. [Exact translation] Elsecallers (english)| קוראי האחרת. [The worst imo. More like "those who call to the other female". Cumbersome.] Willshapers (english)| מעצבי רצון. [Can be translated Will designers. But also work for shapers] Stonewards (english)| שומרי אבן. [Stone guardians/protectors] Bondsmith (english)| חרש כבלים. [For smith it's good translation. But it's more like "smith of ropes;-)" usually we don't use that word for abstract meaning.] Dawnshard (english)| רסיס שחר. Investiture| השקעה. [Like investment] I'll add more but I need to check in the books. All in all, hebrew is not a language for made-up fantasy names. The language has a seriousness to it and many of the names above sound ridiculous in hebrew imo. It gives them seriousness they do not intend to have, and in english they are much lighter. But maybe it's because I don't know english well enough. Good night! (Or maybe afternoon for you)
  22. Is anyone interested in hebrew translation?
  23. actually, you did it quite good! Sure I couldn't. But the things that matter is the sound of the letters in the word and not the actual letter. I wiil explain with examples. From the text of the book: "hell and hate must halt" (the t sound is what matter and not the e letter because we dont pronounce it ) Killed can confound" (k=c) So in your last phrase (demons demand desperate divine deeds) desperate is "t" and not "e" and divine is "n" and not "e". In second thought maybe I'm wrong. Because hell and hate aren't following the exact pattern (it should be hate and hell must halt and not the other way around) so maybe it's not part of the poetry pattern and so I don't have solid evidence that I'm right about the sound thing. Beg your pardon @ConfusedCow
  24. "It was as if … as if they were trying to hit where Ishar was, while he was able to move in anticipation of where they would be." (ch. 111) My point is, that's Spiritual Realm something, and not his skill.
  25. @LuckyJim perhaps you're right. But I think that tendency is justified even if its lead us to wrong assumptions and interpretations. Brandon write in a way that whenever I reread one of his books I discover more forshadowing. So perhaps its nothing this time, but many times its implying something.