Jump to content

Ripheus23

Members
  • Posts

    1141
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Ripheus23 last won the day on November 21 2018

Ripheus23 had the most liked content!

5 Followers

About Ripheus23

  • Birthday 07/15/1986

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.facebook.com/DareToTakeTheTest/

Profile Information

  • Member Title
    Aonspren
  • Location
    Wherever I ought to be
  • Interests
    Interesting things.

Ripheus23's Achievements

988

Reputation

Single Status Update

See all updates by Ripheus23

  1. I had to change my physics idea significantly due to considerations regarding infinitary logic. The idea is that the laws of physics are infinite conjunctions under an ℒ(κ,λ)-structure that shifts over time, with major cosmological processes constituted by those shifts. For example, at t = 0, let the infinitary logic of a given universe be ℒ(0,0). Over the interval t(0 to 1), the structure shifts to ℒ(ω,ω), which corresponds to the initial expansion, the Big Bang. Further major shifts in expansion dynamics result from further increases in ℒ(κ,λ), so that the accelerated expansion, for instance, is a consequence of these dynamics.

    The model has two grounds: an empirical observation and a major prediction. The first involves the idea that perception of a standard continuum results from existing in a dimensionality that succeeds the cardinality of that continuum, much like "complete" perception of a two-dimensional structure results from existence in three dimensions. Assuming that the cardinality of a continuum is aleph-1, then we assume that ℒ(κ,λ) here has aleph-2 for κ (which is the variable for time's dimensionality in the system), such that we perceive time as continuous (of cardinality aleph-1).

    The prediction the theory makes is that at some point in the future, there will be another major shift. The equation I assigned to the shifts picks out aleph-4 as the value for κ resulting from the next shift. Consequently, empirical consciousness should change accordingly, then. So if we survive to that day, we could receive predictive evidence for the model from specifics of cognitive changes at that time.

×
×
  • Create New...