Jump to content

MiToRo94

Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MiToRo94

  1. I’m about 6 hours away, on my drive from SoCal! Just stopped in Vegas, but who needs that kind of excitement when I’m so close to a Sanderson event!?
  2. For anyone else who has a VIP ticket; did you see a place to submit your shirt size? Or are they just going to have a lot of all sizes and we get one when we get there? Can’t wait to see you all on Tuesday! I’m going to be hanging out all day
  3. I have my ticket! And I already posted on reddit, but I might as well give it a shot here; if anyone happens to live around southern CA, or anywhere along the route from there to the event, and would like to carpool, please let me know!
  4. I agree I support this rule I also agree with this. It is very obvious when someone is trying to bend the rules beyond their intent just because they can, and that doesn't move the game along or really make for a fun time for others. New Rule Proposal: The Settlers of Disputes: If a dispute comes up about any aspect of the game, the dispute can be settled by a vote. The dispute will be decided by whichever side gets 3 votes first (any player can place one vote, but if there are multiple people directly involved in either side of the dispute, all those directly involved will only be able to count as one vote per side. This way we prevent a group of 3 players from joining together to jointly benefit from a dispute that they can settle immediately on their own.) EDIT: It should be noted that my profile picture now depicts my dog and snake, which complies with Rule 15 in that it will show up in each of my posts. This also acts as an example of a reasonable loophole around a rule, without blatantly disregarding the intent and bending the rules to an unreasonable extent.
  5. I support this removal I support this rule. New Rule Proposal: Don't Leave the Eggs to Spoil: At the end of each 24 hour period - to be established at midnight EDT for consistency - if none of the players have earned any Eggs (defined as a net positive gain of Eggs for any one player) during those 24 hours (not including Eggs earned from this rule as of the previous 24 hour period), then all players immediately earn 1000 points. Rule 15:
  6. UNO! Violation of Rule 15, and UNO! Violation of Rule 12. You lose 20 Eggs. Also, I do not support this amendment. New Rule Proposal: MiToRo wins! If this rule is put into effect, MiToRo immediately gains 1 million Eggs and wins. Rule 15:
  7. Just because you do not receive any consequences for violating a rule doesn't mean that your violation goes into effect as a real rule, since rule 21 only says that the poster in violation will not lose the 10 Eggs otherwise lost if it has been 15 minutes. Rules only go into effect with a majority vote (of which you can't vote more than once on a rule as per the new literal rules), and your rule did not get a literal majority vote. Now it is true that you won't lose 10 Eggs for attempting to break that rule, since it hasn't been 15 minutes, but nowhere does it say your rule violation goes into effect. Rule 15 is the dog in the quoted content.
  8. UNO! Violation of Rule 15, you lose 10 Eggs UNO! Violation of Rule 15, you lose 10 Eggs Rule 15:
  9. I support this. New Rule Proposal: The Last Will and Testament: If any player wishes to leave the game, they may do so freely. In doing so, they may select another current player to receive all of the retiring player's Eggs (only a positive number of Eggs may be given), or choose to allow the Eggs to expire without going to anyone else. Rule 15:
  10. I do not support this rule. New Rule Proposal: Discarded Proposal: If any proposal has been left unapproved after a total of 24 hours, and during that time a number of players equal to the number necessary for approving it with a majority vote have been active, that proposal will immediately be dismissed and have to be re-submitted without any votes. Rule 15:
  11. New Rule Proposals: The Discord of Disputes: In order to prevent this thread from being over-cluttered with meta-discussion (i.e. discussion about the game in a meta sense, not about the player, MetaTerminal), we should have a Discord channel for all meta-discussion. This channel should be completely exempt from all rules in order to allow for unrestricted discussion and quick resolutions to any disputes. If the players would like separate channels for other discussion (e.g. off-topic, new rule ideas without actually submitting them, commenting on particularly dramatic happenings within the game without cluttering up this thread, etc...) that will be allowed. This Discord channel would also be an good place to have easy access to a pinned list of all currently active rules and proposals. The President of Discord: In the event that we have a Discord channel and we have an elected president as per rule 31, the President will be in charge of keeping the Discord up to date. Rule 15:
  12. If that is the case, then my edit to correct my mistake to Eggs was also made before the UNO post was made calling me out, so I would not have lost any Eggs. Rule 15:
  13. There is no rule that states that you can gain Eggs back after editing a post to make it comply with the rules, and since your post was called out without your edit, you lost those 10 Eggs as soon as I called UNO, and adding the emote with an Edit does not bring those Eggs back. Rule 15:
  14. I support both of these. I do not support this. New Rule Proposal: Maybe A Rule So We Can Actually Start Earning Eggs?: At any time, any group of players (at least 2) may compete in any game available to them (whether online or in person, as long as it can be verified). Examples include, but are not limited to, a game of chess, a pokemon battle, a footrace around the world, etc... Upon completion of the game, the winner gains a number of Eggs equal to 100 x the number of other players (i.e. the winner gains 100 Eggs if the game was only between two players), and the losers lose 100 Eggs each, unless a different amount was specified in a challenge post to initiate the game. In the case of a tie, the following occurs: if all players tie for the win, no Eggs are gained or lost; if some but not all participating players tie for the win, each winner gains a number of Eggs equal to 100 x the number of losers / the number of winners, and each loser still loses 100 Eggs. Rule 15:
  15. I do not support either of these rules. Also, Rule 15 Infraction. Rule 15:
  16. I support this. New Rule Proposals: Fair Start: Any new player who starts the game after this point will begin with a number of Eggs equal to the player with the next lowest amount of Eggs - this could still be 0. Duel of Awww: Any player may challenge another player to a Duel of Awww, along with a bet amount. The challenger may bet any number of Eggs up to the current total Eggs held by the lesser of the two players; if one or both players has 0 Eggs, the bet is automatically set to 10 Eggs. The Duel of Awww begins once the challenged player accepts the duel in a new post. The public (all other players not participating in the duel) votes on which of the two duelers has the better animal picture - as per rule 15 - based on any arbitrary qualifications they would like. The animal pictures used for the duel will be the ones posted in the challenge post and the acceptance post, and must have both been a picture taken/drawn/created by the respective dueler. Once a majority vote has been reached, the winner gains the bet amount in Eggs and the loser loses the same amount, unless the loser has fewer Eggs - in the case of starting with 0 points - then the loser goes to 0 total Eggs while the winner gains 10 Eggs. The Paradox of Retroactive Rulings: Rules will never retroactively apply to posts made prior to the rule being voted into effect - unless directly stated otherwise in the rule. This applies to Eggs given or taken for certain kinds of posts, as well as rule infractions that would lead to any sort of punishment. EDITING IN RULE 15:
  17. I support these. I do not support these I would like to propose the following new rules: Participation Eggs: Once per 24 hour period, if a player makes a post and votes on all current proposals as well as submits at least one new proposal, that player gains 25 Eggs. Non-Participation Eggs: In any 24 hour period, if any player makes more than one post that does not include votes on all current proposals, that player loses 25 Eggs per post after their first without necessary votes. As per Rule 15:
  18. I would also like to propose the following rules: Reputation Points: For each reputation awarded to a post, that poster gains 10 points. Everyone Is A Winner: Any time a proposal - new rule, amendment, removal, or any other rule adjustment - gains unanimous support, the proposer gains 10 points, while the first 2 supporters (after the original proposer) gain 5 points. Unanimous support here means that all players vote in favor of the rule until the rule goes into effect; once the rule would go into effect, future voters who vote against it will not affect the points given by this rule.
  19. I support this I do not support this I support this I support this I support this I support this I do not support this I do not support this I support this I do not support this I do not support this I support this I support this I do not support this I do not support this I support this I do not support this I would like to propose an Amendment to The Act of Dog Inclusion: To change the name of the rule from The Act of Dog Inclusion to The Act of Animal Inclusion, and to allow depictions of any animal to fulfill its requirements, so long as the poster genuinely appreciates the animal being posted - whether that is in cuteness, silliness, or any other positive feeling. I would like to propose the following rules: The Negative Rule: Any player can have negative points if they have lost more points than they currently have, but a player cannot have more negative points than the total amount of points needed to win. MiToRo's Rule of Punishment: Any post that breaks a rule that has been in effect for longer than 15 minutes - to give time for those who have simply not refreshed their page - shall cause that poster to lose 10 points. MiToRo's Rule of Forgiveness: Whenever a player has negative points, that player may post an apology - no shorter than 3 full sentences, and unique to each other player - to other players in order to regain 1 point per apology.
  20. Oh we can come up with a better team name than "Team 4!" At least change the "Team" to bridge @Xavier Iriarte @luckat @Nohadon @Shqueeves, are you all on Discord?
×
×
  • Create New...